07-29-2009, 10:52 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 699
Drives: 370Z-AT7 Tour+Sport
Rep Power: 375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chubbs
............For example, I cannot understand this phrase from the Nissan statement - "...The addition of an oil cooler would have raised the price of the car and potentially moved it out of the reach of some customers..."
That is blatantly rubbish - It would probably cost Nissan $300 max to have fitted an oil cooler to the cars. If they passed that cost onto customers in the basic price of the car nobody would have noticed....
|
I with you 100% on this point. When I read the "beyond the reach" posting I really got a chuckcle out of it. As you said "rubbish".
Quote:
Originally Posted by chubbs
............
There are too many examples on this forum of people getting oil overheating on the public highway for it not to be an issue.
|
Not necessarily with you on this point. The number of those overheating MIGHT be a bit over-exaggerated. Many of the complaints have not mentioned whether their reported temps are for PROLONGED perioids of time or just for a few minutes at a time while they sit in traffic but then temps reduce to within normal ranges once traffic starts moving again.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
11Likes
Threaded Mode
