does anybody know how to adjust the brake proportioning on the z? What would we have to buy because it's too front heavy for my tastes.
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-15-2009, 10:55 AM | #2 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 2,883
Drives: 370Z Sport
Rep Power: 976 |
Quote:
Wilwood Engineering - Proportioning Valves Personally, on an ABS/VDC equipped car I wouldn't suggest you mess with this. You may get into more trouble than you anticipate. Most of your braking force is up front because those are the wheels that do most of the stopping. As you brake, the rear gets lighter. Increasing the pressure to them will result in premature rear lock-up and potential loss of control. This would be a particular problem in the wet. Nissan carefully calculated the optimum bias when the system was engineered.. |
|
09-15-2009, 12:56 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. James, NY
Posts: 237
Drives: 350Z
Rep Power: 16 |
swap to pads with less co-efficient of friction and you'll alter the bias as well
an adjustable proportioning valve is absolutely what you don't want for the reasons pointed to above |
09-15-2009, 03:23 PM | #4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 653 |
The 370Z is supposed to electronically proportion as much brake bias to the rear as it can take under ABS active conditions. Under non-ABS conditions I would agree that the bias is too heavy towards the front, which causes the front brakes to overheat. Put stickier pads in the rear should help. I tried Hawk HP+ in the rear with stock front, but the balance was then too far rearwards.
|
09-15-2009, 06:23 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
Are we talking about adjustable bias here? Never heard it being called proportioning... Are you sure you're not mistaking this "Excessive front braking" with the front heavy nature of the car.... Last edited by RCZ; 09-15-2009 at 06:25 PM. |
|
09-16-2009, 04:12 AM | #7 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In the D
Posts: 3,732
Drives: v8 74 260z ;)
Rep Power: 7251 |
yeah i was actually thinking proportioning valve wise I can do the different pads front and rear and hope that covers it maybe ds2500 front ds3000 rear. If it is electronic i wonder if there will be a way to adjust it in the computer or if the abs/vdc stuff is in a separate system. It's too front heavy for me i don't like the understeer that results under hard braking. I would still set it forward but not as much.
|
09-12-2010, 06:47 AM | #12 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: californee way
Posts: 5,380
Drives: 370, Leaf
Rep Power: 30 |
You should be happy because most cars are even more front bias than the Z cars. The Z cars have the most aggressive rear pads wear rate compare to cars like Corvette, RX8, Mini, etc
|
09-12-2010, 07:03 AM | #13 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 653 |
He said hard braking understeer, turning under hard braking is most definitely bad form and not trail braking. I trail brake on track and the car doesn't understeer, in fact the car rotates. Way to bring up a dead thread for your first post
__________________
Hotchkis ARB | Stillen CAI | Art Pipes | Berk CBE | Stillen AP Racing Brakes | AE Performance Oil Cooler | BC Racing ER Coilovers | Doran Control Arms |
Bookmarks |
|
|