07-17-2012, 03:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 186
Drives: '12 Z34 SR 6MT T/S/N
Rep Power: 13
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by phelan
Mmmm....distributed forces, I had forgotten about that. Good point. I would hope that the torque required for the fasteners would be on the assembly drawing though.
As an engineer, I would actually think if the rationale showed it's still good for use-as-is, the initial cost of material may be prohibitive, and they can provide the rationale and move on. I still don't agree, given the price I can't figure out how they couldn't just buy more metal and redo it, but just saying.
|
exactly, for that price there should be no compromises.
|
|
|