What wheels you looking at?

those CR2P's?

Oh I already ordered them, Work XSA 04C's...this color scheme

The cr2ps are beautiful but something about the hard edges on these that I liked a little more
https://i.imgur.com/Aa30u1x.jpg

wow, never seen those on a Z before. cool

we'll see how they look..cross them fingers! My Z is black as well, I photoshopped that brz black to make sure I liked the combo.

****, somebody must've had a bad day. I didn't know all of that would be necessary. I know somebody with 265s on the back, but no spacer. So, I was thinking with spacers, I could get the poke. And I said I wanted to make some suspension changes, but the car won't be tracked, nor will it have any excessive camber, so I saw no need for $1,500 coilovers or a total suspension overhaul. I didn't know that replacing any components would be necessary for what I asked. Now, thanks to your grumpy response, I do, so thanks, I guess.

te37 19x9.5 +22 front on 225/25 19 and 19x10.5 +22 rear on 285/35 19, im trying to get a flush tire to fender fitment with less possible camber(-1 or 0) while being slammed, would this work out

Your rear tires are my front tires. :rofl2:

Front wheel is a pretty common fitment. Rears are going to need 15mm or 20mm spacers to even out the "flushness". Where did you come up with the wacky tire sizes?

They’re local buy I was just tired of of wheels, I’m currently running 20x10.5 and 20x12.5 with 325 in the rear

your front tires are almost everyones rears, if not bigger!

Slammed & minimum negative camber may be tricky; as most use this to clear wheels... Sounds like you may want to lower/slam your suspension first, then preliminary set your camber/alignment with a non aggressive wheel/tire size & use spacers to push the wheels out to your desired look (without interference),,, -camber is used by many to clear aggressive stance wheel tire combo’s.
Generally on a 1”stagger wheel set, the rears are usually 10-15mm more aggressive than the fronts.
Seeing that you’re using 9.5/10.5 combo...may want to start with factory NISMO wheels first (9.5+40/10.5+23)

Here’s a pic of mine; when the F/R camber was@ -1.0* the outside rim lips of these +38 10/12’s would be equivalent to a 9.5+32/10.5+19
Stock ride height; but gives you something to go by if slammed down with your desired camber.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...b28b36f0aa.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Iv gone through all the stickied wheel fitment threads and Im starting to see a trend. A lot of members talk about "you will have to run extensive camber with those specs and drop" and they arent even super aggressive. When I see and read people having -2 to around -3.5, that doesnt seem anywhere near "extensive camber" Why do a lot of members on here act like it is? I had -3 on my G35 and it hardly looked aggressive or extensive/ too much. I also go 15k miles out of my rears.

am I missing something?


https://i.imgur.com/CktdYGX.jpg

all your missing is some old school thinking

only been in the car community since 2006. I know plenty of people that PREFER stock or close to ZERO camber but they had no other reason aside from "thats what I like" or "I dont want my tires to wear out quicker". Some people treat conservative camber like its hellaflush or dumped.

Maybe you're right though, even though Im 33, I dont really understand that perspective.

Though I do understand camber and its purpose