Originally Posted by Chuck33079 That's a laughing matter to you? Wow. **** happens, no one got hurt, guy got paid with-in 5 business days, I'm not legally involved in anything,
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-21-2013, 10:56 AM | #46 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
**** happens, no one got hurt, guy got paid with-in 5 business days, I'm not legally involved in anything, it's a screwed up situation , I just roll my eyes when people talk about it. People make it seem its like something its not.
I haven't talked about it too much because there is currently legal action going on between other partys*. That's all I care to say on the subject John |
11-21-2013, 10:58 AM | #47 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29539 |
Quote:
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent |
|
11-21-2013, 11:05 AM | #48 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Found some really good logs..
I have a stock car logged, then my final tune which shows actual ignition timing, and what the car would have ran is EcuTek wasnt on it Give me a min |
11-21-2013, 11:31 AM | #53 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Well, I was expecting a CSV, but this does show 30 degrees being commanded and logged, which is a touch more than I've ever seen my own ECU do under any condition. (At WOT above 6k RPM)
Curious how your much more linear timing curve affects low/mid range response, but you can definitely tell the Nissan code isn't at work there. Looks like you can definitely get 2-3 more degrees of timing with EcuTek than you can hope for with Uprev. |
11-21-2013, 11:33 AM | #54 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
What you can take away from this is how inconsistent the factory timing control is on these cars.
Nothing has changed mechanically on the car yet the factory ecu runs a different timing curve almost every time I pull the car. For those NA guys this might not be a big deal because it's not going to blow up your motor, but on forced induction guys that extra 2 degrees of timing the ecu *might* add could be a problem. With the EcuTek's RaceRom ignition control we are able to bypass the OEM timing logic which is in calculated burn time with real ignition maps that do what we want all while keeping Knock Control John |
11-21-2013, 11:34 AM | #55 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Just to be clear though, the parameter "Ignition Timing ()" is a MEASURED/OBSERVED reading, not a commanded reading, correct?
Just like I can log commanded AFR vs the actual observed AFR. |
11-21-2013, 11:36 AM | #56 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
Curious, this is on the dyno, yes? Dynojet? I've never logged on a Dynojet, only a Mustang and on the street, so the loads are a lot different. Just trying to reconcile what the stock ECU commanded there vs what mine commanded in the same conditions. |
|
11-21-2013, 11:38 AM | #57 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
EcuTek has some more advanced datalog parameters that can only be logged with one of their flashes. One of those parameters is Ignition Timing Calculated, which shows what the car would have ran if you were using OEM timing control. |
|
11-21-2013, 11:38 AM | #58 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
John |
|
11-21-2013, 11:41 AM | #59 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Wow interesting.
Never had my car (stock) do anything more than 27 degrees on the dyno, 24-26 was the norm. Now I can expect 28 regularly depending on coolant temp, which is a lot more stable with the huge radiator. Wonder if the G's huge front cooling surface area has anything to do with that. Anyway, thanks for all the info. |
11-21-2013, 11:44 AM | #60 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
So yes, this car ran a few more degrees of timing than the others.. That's the thing, these cars have a dynamic timing control, it can switch between 3-4 different timing maps that have all these crazy multipliers.. You change one table and the car switches to another set of tables.. which is why the timing is often not the the same. Different ECU versions have crazier timing control than others. John |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EcuTek ProECU Group Buy | Dynotronics1 | Tuning | 263 | 05-07-2014 09:32 PM |
EcuTek Tuning on the 370z now available! | R/T Tuning | R/T Tuning | 9 | 01-23-2014 10:20 AM |
My Initial Impressions of EcuTek/Dynotronics | tiger123 | Tuning | 29 | 12-05-2013 05:04 PM |
First impressions of EcuTek tune on nearly stock Z | JARblue | Tuning | 45 | 10-05-2013 03:20 PM |