![]() |
Ok, so not really related to tuning, but couldnt find where to post(admins please move if necessary, sorry and thanks). Today i did a few baseline runs on my completely
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PR
Posts: 1,530
Drives: Zeta
Rep Power: 469 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Ok, so not really related to tuning, but couldnt find where to post(admins please move if necessary, sorry and thanks). Today i did a few baseline runs on my completely stock 2013 Z and here are the results:
270whp 220 tq I know these are just numbers, and while i feel good about whp, i guess i expected to see a bit higher tq number, what do you guys think? Runs were made on 4th in a mustang dyno. Humidity was high and Temp was about 92 degrees. I'll try and post the graph later on. Comments/opinios are welcome ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PR
Posts: 1,530
Drives: Zeta
Rep Power: 469 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,051
Drives: 2013 Silver 370z
Rep Power: 3389 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
13 370z- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PR
Posts: 1,530
Drives: Zeta
Rep Power: 469 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
4th is fine -- less wear and tear on the motor.
Those numbers are in line with expectations, and that particular dyno is calibrated to read close to a dynojet. EDIT: Correction; the whp figures are close (although on the lower side) but the wtq readings a very low relative to a dynojet.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. Last edited by Jordo!; 07-24-2013 at 12:12 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 75
Drives: 2010 370Z Roadster
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
Hi,
On the mustang dyno, there is a factor that says "HP@50 Miles/hr". May I ask what number is keyed in? Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 75
Drives: 2010 370Z Roadster
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
You should see it at the bottom of the main screen. Mustang has a list of cars with these figures which the Dyno operator must key in but unfortunately, Mustang stopped updating the list since 2007. Our cars are not listed and that can affect the Dyno figures....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PR
Posts: 1,530
Drives: Zeta
Rep Power: 469 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I'm just wondering where the public can find these values listed. It should be public domain info but I can only find references to it and no actual tables with data ![]() Anyway, notwithstanding the degree to which any given dyno reports "true" values, I find that you get less consistent results between load holding dynos vs. inertia dynos because different values may be entered between shops. I say, find a place with a dynojet. Your numbers will be easier to compare and contrast as the key value of relevance (the weight of the drum the wheels accelerate) is fixed from unit to unit, and thus results are far more consistent (i.e., reliable). Then you just have to note SAE values vs uncorrected and or STD, as well as the gear you are in (4th is fine, although derived torque values tend to be a bit lower relative to 5th). In other words, the values different individuals get from shop to shop on Mustang dynos are harder to compare than the values folks get from dynojets, and at the end of the day, THAT is how to most clearly conclude anything about how your VQ37 compares to others. If you go, ask for the drf (actual data file) -- if you email it to me I can make comparison graphs of your output vs several others.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this good dyno numbers? | tnoble123 | Engine & Drivetrain | 22 | 04-29-2013 11:16 PM |
Do my dyno numbers seem a little low | cubbies1031 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 2 | 07-31-2012 12:15 AM |
My Dyno Numbers | joshs09slvrZ | Tuning | 20 | 10-27-2011 07:39 AM |
Dyno numbers for HKS Hi-Power Ti??? | Footloose301 | Intake/Exhaust | 48 | 02-09-2011 10:46 AM |
Dyno Numbers | PR370z | Intake/Exhaust | 13 | 12-05-2010 09:56 AM |