Nissan 370Z Forum  

My dyno numbers

But if we can just get the number from Mustang somehow, it'll be a lot more accurate than Dynojet. On the Dynojet it's like you are running in cyber space...wouldn't

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain > Tuning


Like Tree11Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2013, 05:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 75
Drives: 2010 370Z Roadster
Rep Power: 13
blumango is on a distinguished road
Default

But if we can just get the number from Mustang somehow, it'll be a lot more accurate than Dynojet. On the Dynojet it's like you are running in cyber space...wouldn't that affect the AFR readings too?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
In theory, that value should be about the same for both the G37 and Z, so assuming the value they entered was correct for the G, you should be in the ball park.

I'm just wondering where the public can find these values listed.

It should be public domain info but I can only find references to it and no actual tables with data

Anyway, notwithstanding the degree to which any given dyno reports "true" values, I find that you get less consistent results between load holding dynos vs. inertia dynos because different values may be entered between shops.

I say, find a place with a dynojet. Your numbers will be easier to compare and contrast as the key value of relevance (the weight of the drum the wheels accelerate) is fixed from unit to unit, and thus results are far more consistent (i.e., reliable). Then you just have to note SAE values vs uncorrected and or STD, as well as the gear you are in (4th is fine, although derived torque values tend to be a bit lower relative to 5th).

In other words, the values different individuals get from shop to shop on Mustang dynos are harder to compare than the values folks get from dynojets, and at the end of the day, THAT is how to most clearly conclude anything about how your VQ37 compares to others.

If you go, ask for the drf (actual data file) -- if you email it to me I can make comparison graphs of your output vs several others.
blumango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 03:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418
Jordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blumango View Post
But if we can just get the number from Mustang somehow, it'll be a lot more accurate than Dynojet. On the Dynojet it's like you are running in cyber space...wouldn't that affect the AFR readings too?
Accuracy is relative -- you'd really have to pull the motor out for a "true" value anyway.

What matters is consistency.

For an individual car, that means sticking with the same shop; across cars, that means the same values must be entered for the formulas used to estimate power and torque -- on dynojets, that value is fixed (known weight and diameter of drum) on load bearing dynos, that value may be quite different from shop to shop.

Load holding dynos are better for tuning, and perhaps for making comparisons for a single vehicle, but they make it much harder to evaluate the results for any one specific vehicle in relation to data gathered from other vehicles at different shops.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2013, 07:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 75
Drives: 2010 370Z Roadster
Rep Power: 13
blumango is on a distinguished road
Default

I meant accuracy on power you are making at the wheels. If given values are keyed in correctly on a Mustang, we should be getting a more "real-life" measurement of power rather than one that only includes the weight of the rollers in the algorithm. And what's most important is AFR....without load (Dynojet), wouldn't that be extremely different when you are actually driving on the road?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
Accuracy is relative -- you'd really have to pull the motor out for a "true" value anyway.

What matters is consistency.

For an individual car, that means sticking with the same shop; across cars, that means the same values must be entered for the formulas used to estimate power and torque -- on dynojets, that value is fixed (known weight and diameter of drum) on load bearing dynos, that value may be quite different from shop to shop.

Load holding dynos are better for tuning, and perhaps for making comparisons for a single vehicle, but they make it much harder to evaluate the results for any one specific vehicle in relation to data gathered from other vehicles at different shops.
blumango is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this good dyno numbers? tnoble123 Engine & Drivetrain 22 04-29-2013 11:16 PM
Do my dyno numbers seem a little low cubbies1031 Nissan 370Z General Discussions 2 07-31-2012 12:15 AM
My Dyno Numbers joshs09slvrZ Tuning 20 10-27-2011 07:39 AM
Dyno numbers for HKS Hi-Power Ti??? Footloose301 Intake/Exhaust 48 02-09-2011 10:46 AM
Dyno Numbers PR370z Intake/Exhaust 13 12-05-2010 09:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2