Originally Posted by AlexRaymond19 Any update on VVEL tuning? Originally Posted by johncy2000 Any update on VVEL tuning? Originally Posted by NitrousZ34 Any update on VVEL tuning? I just recently
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-05-2013, 06:00 AM | #316 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Guam
Posts: 451
Drives: Toretto around
Rep Power: 14 |
I just recently got an etune from Uprev and Randy says they do not offer it yet and he said that the VVEL is tuned good from the factory that after some runs they were unable to get any gains with a bolt on Z.
So far only one I've seen is John@Z1 offer this and has seen some gains from it.
__________________
A special "Thank You" to the Fast Intentions Crew! "Fueled By Passion" |
04-05-2013, 06:47 AM | #317 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 771
Drives: 2010 Nissan 370z
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
__________________
2010 370Z Touring MT | Stillen | Motordyne | Momentum| Z1 | Fast Intentions | Advant Garde | RE11 | Swift | SPC | Quaife | Whiteline | Evo R | 322RWHP 259ft-lb Mustang |
|
04-05-2013, 07:36 PM | #318 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Mexico
Posts: 106
Drives: 370zM6tour12nosport
Rep Power: 13 |
I saw in UpRev's Facebook that pro tuners have the Beta version for VVEL tuning.
Hope someone in this forum that has had any experience with this would comment about it.
__________________
Stillen [gen3 CAI + headers + HFC + Exhaust + UD Pulley + lightweight flywheel] + Uprev e-tune+ PC680 Odyssey battery + oil cooler + MishimotoThermostat = 312whp + 252wtq @1,500mts or 5,000ft elevation |
04-05-2013, 07:44 PM | #319 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lawrenceville,Ga
Posts: 4,293
Drives: My foot up your azz
Rep Power: 30 |
The VVEL is really going to shine with the guys who have FI,you N/A guys aren't going to gain that much at all.
__________________
2013 ZL1 754 rwhp 747 rwtq |
04-05-2013, 11:19 PM | #320 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
How does changing the profile of the intake cam more dramatically affect the FI systems for the 370 than N/A? The TT guys maybe could tweak it to add duration and lift earlier and spool faster? Maybe? I dunno, you can't make it open any further or anything than it already does, that's why Uprev is saying they weren't able to get much out of it. They smoothed the curves a little on my car, but that's about it. It already goes to maximum (safe) lift and duration on the stock tune. |
|
04-06-2013, 02:36 PM | #322 (permalink) |
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 |
With Superchargers, there is a lot of blow through through the heads and makes it difficult to build pressure. Reducing the overlap and running a less aggressive profile will allow the SC's to get boost up quicker. Don't quote me, but I don't think turbo's have this same problem. It's also a big reason why long tubes weren't making the same power as a stock header because the heads and exhaust were too efficient. It made more power per lbs of boost, but not enough boost to make more power than the stock headers. I feel being able to control VVEL will be a big deal for supercharged cars. Maybe we can reduce overlap to increase pressure, and open it up progressively so it gets top end efficiency. Just a theory, but it sounds good lol.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction |
04-06-2013, 08:16 PM | #323 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418 |
Quote:
Essentially, as I understand it, you want just enough overlap for achieving peak torque -- wrong timing means you just lose boost, blown out before it has a chance to build peak pressure. With turbos I believe you want as little overlap as possible, as you want to get exhaust gasses flowing as much as possible. I'm more familiar with SC's, so someone correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. |
|
04-06-2013, 08:52 PM | #324 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 1,052
Drives: PearlWhite 370z 6MT
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Dont hang me for this, just sharing what i was told lol which actually made me re-think going TT. idk, |
|
04-06-2013, 09:16 PM | #325 (permalink) | |
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 |
Quote:
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction |
|
04-07-2013, 10:34 PM | #326 (permalink) | ||
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lawrenceville,Ga
Posts: 4,293
Drives: My foot up your azz
Rep Power: 30 |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2013 ZL1 754 rwhp 747 rwtq |
||
04-08-2013, 08:17 AM | #327 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
All of these comments about blow through would be perfectly valid if we were talking about a system that does anything to the exhaust cam.
Until the variable phasing on the exhaust side is tunable, I don't see how it's relevant. I don't see how holding the intake closed until the exhaust has closed would net you any real benefit since you'd be waiting until the piston was already on it's way back down before you open the valve. Surely any small gain you get from preventing blowthrough would be offset simply by there being far less time for gasses to enter the cylinder? I mean, testing and time will tell, of course. Maybe they can work some magic? |
04-08-2013, 03:58 PM | #328 (permalink) |
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 |
Reducing the duration will increase pressure because less air is being blown through. With boost pressure just being a measurement of resistance, being able to modify how far and long the intake valves open should effectively change how and when the superchargers are reaching peak efficiency. The problem is there is too much overlap. The combustion process is still happening as usual, it's just when both the intake and exhaust valves are open, it's open for too long and reduces pressure. Getting more pressure built up on the intake side should allow more air to be pressurized in the combustion chamber when the intakes do open. Sorry if I'm talking in circles, I'm just trying to hit all the angles.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction |
04-08-2013, 05:09 PM | #329 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
Retarding the intake opening would make for some serious drivability issues, if taken too far (read: far enough to make any difference). This is all in my estimation, so feel free to prove me wrong, GTM! |
|
04-08-2013, 05:57 PM | #330 (permalink) |
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 |
GTM hasn't talked about VVEL tuning with me, just the blow through effect. I have no idea if they tried tuning VVEL yet. I have no idea what the tables would look like for VVEL, but I imagine it can be tuned for all types of driving, NA, or FI. I wish there was more public info on the topic though.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VVEL Cracking? | antivirus6613 | Engine & Drivetrain | 165 | 12-15-2011 02:20 PM |
Found Possible Fix To VVEL | Nabi | Tuning | 35 | 10-23-2011 07:13 PM |
Vvel ???? | pokeyl | Tuning | 8 | 06-01-2011 04:33 PM |
VVEL Tuning | KEVTEX | Tuning | 20 | 10-09-2010 12:23 AM |
Vvel | destinyZ | Engine & Drivetrain | 13 | 09-19-2010 07:32 PM |