![]() |
Well, for now I'll stick by my subjective impression (which was fairly strong) that UpRev and the tuners are right: maps with a solid column (or more) of 3800 values
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3595 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Well, for now I'll stick by my subjective impression (which was fairly strong) that UpRev and the tuners are right: maps with a solid column (or more) of 3800 values at the end do get on the throttle quicker at lower RPMs when you stomp the pedal all the way.
The MPH and RPM data via Cipher simply isn't good enough to infer g's of accel at the fine scale needed to tell the difference between the stock and non-stock maps at low RPMs in the scenario above, and adding to the error is my inability to get the graph start points lined up precisely (same starting pedal pos + rpm, leading to same timestamp for first full-throttle sample). I'll post up this chart here anyways so you can see what the data looks like, but the bottom line to me is "too noisy and inaccurate to tell anything from". MAP4 is stock, MAP3 is one of the 3800 maps (the 2300 one in this case, not that it matters which at full throttle): ![]() Last edited by wstar; 10-17-2011 at 08:55 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
370Z FI Throttle Response: Boost vs. Throttle Position | DIGItonium | Forced Induction | 9 | 01-23-2011 08:49 PM |
Adjusting Throttle Response with UpRev? | AlphaSnacks | Tuning | 4 | 12-05-2010 03:40 AM |
2nd gear not as smooth as the others??? | VQinside | Engine & Drivetrain | 14 | 11-03-2010 09:22 PM |
UpRev Osiris/Technosquare users- throttle mapping? | SE | Tuning | 3 | 08-29-2010 05:03 PM |
Smooth launch in 1st Gear? | BrianMSmith | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 22 | 03-26-2010 10:40 PM |