![]() |
Wow you're right I made a back up of the original rim editor and supporting files and updated it. I wonder why they went back to the 6800 line
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | ||
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lawrenceville,Ga
Posts: 4,293
Drives: My foot up your azz
Rep Power: 30 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
2013 ZL1 754 rwhp 747 rwtq ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
![]()
HI guys! I am new here. I do not have a 370z, but I have a crossover 2008 Infiniti EX35, which is now called Infiniti QX50. I believe I am the only guy with UpRev tuned EX35 and Seymore4 did my E-tuning a few weeks ago. It is NA Engine -VQ35HR AWD 5SPEED A/T dual intake.
I have a Uprev tuner's version and I could play around with the tune 24/7 =) Basically, I only requested 3 MAPS, 1)TUNED WOT-Rich 12.9:1 for Winter 2)Valet 3)Tuned-WOT-Lean (fuel economy) 13.25:1 So I got bored and read this forum. I decided to copy all parameters from my MAP1 except the Electronic Throttle one. I copy what WSTAR made on his throttle parameters and I noticed a much better improvement from 2.5K up RPM. I could definitely see an improvement in smoothness and throttle response specially on the highway. NEW MAP#5 DONE! ![]() Thumbs up to WSTAR ! I enjoy using my new MAP4 with Wstar throttle settings when I drive on the highway. Is this WSTAR final ELEC. Throttle Settings? BTW, even though ECU ROM on CIPHER shows 6400 RPM MAX vs 6800 and 7200, the settings still works for my car~ UNKNOWNDESI, What about your parameters? Is yours final too? I will give that throttle parameters a try too and I will report back. That will go to my MAP#5. Last edited by Awgd8; 09-27-2013 at 07:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lawrenceville,Ga
Posts: 4,293
Drives: My foot up your azz
Rep Power: 30 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Your not suppose to change 6800-7200 rpm,you just leave the stock values if not the ECU will throw it into limp mode at high RPM.
__________________
2013 ZL1 754 rwhp 747 rwtq ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Thanks again for posting your throttle settings here. I will give your setup a try later today. If you can see above, my Cipher RPM for Elec. Throttle is only up to 6400 RPM. The rest are up to 7200 RPM (fuel map etc) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3595 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Not that it matters now since the 7200 line is gone in the new version, but I should note that yes mine threw a P0605 eventually. I just hadn't actually hit the rev limiter with that map in place. Once I did, boy that was unpleasant
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
![]()
Ok I just tried both settings from baer383 and wstar and I could hardly tell the difference. I just noticed I have slight rough downshift while cruising with baer383 settings. It id only once in a while, not all the time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3595 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
The differences are subtle. Also, as noted earlier in this thread: I think the general improvements are good with these maps (in that they allow WOT at low RPM with a bit less lag, and they do it with a smooth function instead of a herky-jerky step function), but I think the curves are backwards from where they should be for drivability. I just haven't had the time or inclination to go and come up with another version of this.
By the way, have you compared your stock map with the copy of my stock map I posted? I don't know how close they are to begin with. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
So far, I am using your throttle settings. Syemore4 (UpRev pro and E-tuner) setup my tuned throttle Map. His setting is a lot smoother, but yours has early pedal pull. Less than 1/4 pedal push at 2.3K RPM in D mode (I drive 99% manual mode) the response is there. Seymore throttle response starts at 2.7-2.8 K RPM. Once I pass 1/4 pedal travel, responsiveness starts. So I find yours as my DD settings. It is really good! I just posted my stock throttle vs wstar stock throttle settings. Still pending approval. What the !$@ kvk! Last edited by Awgd8; 09-29-2013 at 06:24 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3595 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I don't think I posted this here before, only off in another thread, but this is what I mean. This is a scan from the excellent book "Think Fast" that covers a lot of race car setup stuff. They're making the case that it's better for the curve to go in the opposite direction of the one in my throttle table. Either way you want the start and end points the same, so the curvature of the graph is all about trading off fine control in one area for lack of fine control (rapid response to input) in another, and the argument is basically that you want more fine control in the low end of the pedal since that's where you're feathering around with traction in mid-corner:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I could help with testing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3595 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I will someday. Setting up the software to do it as a one-off and doing all the street testing of the map is a time consuming PITA, and I've just got bigger things to worry about right now than fine-tuning the throttle (like, wiring up my new dash/steering controls and getting the cage-related stuff done). Maybe in November when all that settles down.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29539 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Whoops. Wrong thread.
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
370Z FI Throttle Response: Boost vs. Throttle Position | DIGItonium | Forced Induction | 9 | 01-23-2011 08:49 PM |
Adjusting Throttle Response with UpRev? | AlphaSnacks | Tuning | 4 | 12-05-2010 03:40 AM |
2nd gear not as smooth as the others??? | VQinside | Engine & Drivetrain | 14 | 11-03-2010 09:22 PM |
UpRev Osiris/Technosquare users- throttle mapping? | SE | Tuning | 3 | 08-29-2010 05:03 PM |
Smooth launch in 1st Gear? | BrianMSmith | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 22 | 03-26-2010 10:40 PM |