Pic of Service Manual page that shows the adjustment bolts:
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-19-2011, 11:02 AM | #107 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 632
Drives: 2010 PW 370z
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Would balancing the engine not be something that was done when putting it together? |
|
10-19-2011, 11:07 AM | #108 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120 |
Quote:
V6 motors are inherently unbalanced. |
|
10-19-2011, 11:46 AM | #112 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594 |
I would *guess* that the factory lift spec for the adjuster is so they can have reasonable mfg tolerances. e.g. some of the VVEL units mfg'd will have slightly different physical limits, but the factory spec is something that all VVEL units can be adjusted to at the factory with those bolts. You might find that some engines have more leftover room on the adjust than others (or even different on the two sides of one engine, and you really want them to match up perfectly). Still, even assuming most engines have some usable adjustment headroom on both sides and you could adjust them perfectly in sync with each other, and it doesn't cause physical contact, you're left with question marks about whether the stock ECU can deal with that safely, and/or what (possibly unknown) tuneables to tweak there to make it work right).
|
10-19-2011, 12:01 PM | #113 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
I think coping with the new angle and lift induced by manual adjustment would need another cam angle table in aftermarket software. |
|
10-19-2011, 02:02 PM | #115 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418 |
Quote:
It just seems really surprising to me that with better flowing intake and exhaust components that VVEL tuning wouldn't be advantageous, but data trumps theory so... I'd really like to know more details about what kinds of tests and adjustments were done before the conclusion "not worth it" was determined
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. |
|
10-20-2011, 05:49 AM | #116 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 14 |
I agree, providing you have piston clearance plus another table for the 'extended' cam opening in terms of fueling and ignition. I dont see how another 0.025" of lift and 5 degress of duration wouldnt make power on a bolt-on equiped Z
Looking at a bunch of I/H/E dynos generally shows everyone running out of puff around 7k RPM, unless the exhaust cam is the limiting factor thats where the additional lift should help out. Last edited by pulpmelon_Z; 10-28-2011 at 06:20 AM. |
02-09-2012, 10:50 AM | #119 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 2,158
Drives: Lotus Exige S
Rep Power: 20 |
Not holding my breath for someone to crack VVEL but I hope someone does it. It looks like it will need both a hardware adjustment and separate ecu tuning.
__________________
2009 Carbon Fiber/Red 370z aka Trish: Sports Package, Meisterschaft full catback, Fast Intentions Longtube Headers, Injen Long Tube Intakes, UpRev Tune: Sold 2008 Lotus Exige S Club Racer aka Bella, always leaves me smiling |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vvel ???? | pokeyl | Tuning | 8 | 06-01-2011 04:33 PM |
unlock button | js1 | Exterior & Interior | 7 | 01-19-2011 11:32 AM |
VVEL Tuning | KEVTEX | Tuning | 20 | 10-09-2010 12:23 AM |
Vvel | destinyZ | Engine & Drivetrain | 13 | 09-19-2010 07:32 PM |
VVEL information? | Orphan | Engine & Drivetrain | 4 | 09-21-2009 01:48 AM |