![]() |
Originally Posted by dts3 So I started my CAN logging software on my laptop and started logging in Uprev, hoping to see the PID requests for each parameter one by
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 230
Drives: G37 Sport
Rep Power: 6721 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
The K-Line is still on pin 7 of the OBD connector and goes directly to pin 117 of the ECU. Nissan sometimes calls it "K-Line" and sometimes calls it "Data Link Connector" Try this test: • With the CAN bus not connected, log data and look at the time between samples. The UpRev log shows time in milliseconds. • Hook up the CAN bus and run the data logging program again. Since the K-Line runs at 10,400 bits per second, and CAN bus runs at 500,000 bits per second, I would expect the time between data to be much faster with the CAN bus. I suspect the UpRev software checked the CAN bus for communication, didn't see it and "failed over" to the K-line. This would allow them to use the same code for older cars (before 2008) that don't have CAN bus. I look forward to your test results ![]() Last edited by SonicVQ; 04-26-2020 at 08:59 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
People hacking cars | Rooster89 | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 1 | 07-23-2011 06:32 AM |