Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Tuning (http://www.the370z.com/tuning/)
-   -   Uprev vs Ecutek (http://www.the370z.com/tuning/122494-uprev-vs-ecutek.html)

mag_black 07-05-2017 10:50 PM

Uprev vs Ecutek
 
I claimed my free Ecutek kit this year. Here is my Uprev vs Ecutek tune. I dyno-ed last year w/ uprev after installing the Z1 ported upper and got a retune to see if the ported mani did anything... it did not, it seemed like I lost power. My numbers from last year w/ Uprev are the same as the base run this year (blue). Thanks to Tobin and Godmodz for the sponsorship and competition. I can definitely feel the difference w/ Ecutek and the racerom features are really fun to drive w/.

Mods:
(blue)
Uprev, FI CBE, ART pipes, Stillen g3, Z1 upper


(red)
Ecutek, FI CBE, ART pipes, Stillen g3, Z1 upper


http://www.the370z.com/members/mag_b...stillen-g3.jpg

jmroy6 07-06-2017 11:39 AM

Nice gains throughout the powerband. Rob seems to know his stuff when it comes to ecutek.

Spartan 1771 09-21-2017 10:17 AM

I realize the gains here are pretty significant and that's the important thing, but I'm curious to know why are the overall numbers are so low? On average, it seems as if a brand new stock Z makes around 285 rwhp. Why is your best run showing just that with all of these modifications?

redondoaveb 09-21-2017 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan 1771 (Post 3694922)
I realize the gains here are pretty significant and that's the important thing, but I'm curious to know why are the overall numbers are so low? On average, it seems as if a brand new stock Z makes around 285 rwhp. Why is your best run showing just that with all of these modifications?

He made almost 318 with ecutek.

jmroy6 09-21-2017 01:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan 1771 (Post 3694922)
I realize the gains here are pretty significant and that's the important thing, but I'm curious to know why are the overall numbers are so low? On average, it seems as if a brand new stock Z makes around 285 rwhp. Why is your best run showing just that with all of these modifications?

This dyno obviously reads lower than others that have been posted on the forum. all dynos will read different, there are just to many variables to factor in. i made 316whp on this dyno with the same tuner and similar mods.

Spartan 1771 09-21-2017 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmroy6 (Post 3694951)
This dyno obviously reads lower than others that have been posted on the forum. all dynos will read different, there are just to many variables to factor in. i made 316whp on this dyno with the same tuner and similar mods.

Interesting. Thanks for the reply.

I'm scheduled to have Ecutek installed tomorrow by a master tuner. I'm looking forward to the results.

Jhill 09-22-2017 02:51 AM

Cool, nice results. I'm curious though is this same tuner vs same tuner at relatively same timeline? Just wondering how much of a controlled experiment this was. I myself am on ecutek and happy but at the time uprev didn't have the ignition table they do now etc etc. just odd to have such gains difference when both supposedly can adjust the fuel and ignition tables the same now. Ecutek still seems to win on features and the adjustable traction control is what did it for me but don't want to make them seem a bigger difference than they are (don't want to bash uprev unnecessarily, competition is good for us end users). I would think the software can only do so much for power gains and then the rest would be what additional features are provided.

Spartan 1771 09-22-2017 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redondoaveb (Post 3694926)
He made almost 318 with ecutek.

Ok, I'm an idiot. I wasn't looking at the bar graph, just at the red and blue numbers listed on the graph: 287.393 (red), 258.652 (blue), etc. Now that I realize my mistake, 318 makes perfect sense.

Thanks for pointing this out.

redondoaveb 09-22-2017 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan 1771 (Post 3695147)
Ok, I'm an idiot. I wasn't looking at the bar graph, just at the red and blue numbers listed on the graph: 287.393 (red), 258.652 (blue), etc. Now that I realize my mistake, 318 makes perfect sense.

Thanks for pointing this out.

It threw me off too. Post up your results after your tune today.

Spartan 1771 09-22-2017 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redondoaveb (Post 3695165)
It threw me off too. Post up your results after your tune today.

These results are better then I could have hoped for. This seems pretty high, but the car feels pretty damn fast.

The tune pretty much cleaned up all of the throttle lag, the idle is much smoother and it feels smoother all the way through the powerband. It feels much more responsive and it is seriously noticable in the higher Rpms. I didn't get to play with it much today. Rush hour traffic prevented that from happening. I will definitely play with it more this weekend. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...1926e04399.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...49048826f5.jpg

redondoaveb 09-22-2017 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan 1771 (Post 3695286)
These results are better then I could have hoped for. This seems pretty high, but the car feels pretty damn fast.

The tune pretty much cleaned up all of the throttle lag, the idle is much smoother and it feels smoother all the way through the powerband. It feels much more responsive and it is seriously noticable in the higher Rpms. I didn't get to play with it much today. Rush hour traffic prevented that from happening. I will definitely play with it more this weekend. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...1926e04399.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...49048826f5.jpg

Wow, those are great numbers. That's what most guy's are hoping to see and end up seeing about 20hp less. Nice job!

Spartan 1771 09-23-2017 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redondoaveb (Post 3695328)
Wow, those are great numbers. That's what most guy's are hoping to see and end up seeing about 20hp. Nice job!

I've read a lot about dyno dynamics being a real heart breaker because they are usually 1-2% lower then a Dynojet. It sure didn't break my heart!

redondoaveb 09-23-2017 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan 1771 (Post 3695442)
I've read a lot about dyno dynamics being a real heart breaker because they are usually 1-2% lower then a Dynojet. It sure didn't break my heart!

Have you had a chance to do much testing with the butt dyno, how's it feel? :driving:

Spartan 1771 09-24-2017 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redondoaveb (Post 3695564)
Have you had a chance to do much testing with the butt dyno, how's it feel? :driving:

I did a brake job today and then took it out for an hour test drive after. It feels awesome. Extremely smooth and responsive throughout the entire power band. It's almost scary fast now. I'm thoroughly impressed. The traction control doesn't kick on as easily, allowing me to have more control and freedom and the slightly higher rev-limiter is a nice touch.

Because I don't have the syncro-revmatch trans, the only other map I have is for valet. We spoke about an economy map, pops and bangs and a ghost cam, but I decided against all of them. A lean economy map could possibly damage my HF cats. Pops and bangs and a ghost cam sounded unnecessilary streneous on the engine for no real gain, other then to sound cool.

370Zsteve 09-24-2017 10:23 PM

Far and away the highest numbers ever posted for a stock VQ37 with bolt ons and a tune. Put it on a different dyno, those numbers are whack.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2