![]() |
Originally Posted by Chuck33079 Regardless the car is NA or FI, Ecutek is a better program. It gives the tuner far more control over timing. the term "better" is subjective
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | ||
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Fontana
Posts: 315
Drives: Z32
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
They currently both offer Launch Control & Flat Foot Shifting. only thing that currently puts ECUTek over UpRev feature wise is the flex fuel and boost control. I wouldn't say "ignition control" makes it better, specially if you are N/A. Quote:
I find controlling timing with UpRev and ECUTek to be just as easy to use and just as reliable for the N/A Crowd. if you are boosted then ECUTek makes sense, ONLY if you go to the right tuner that uses the custom tables to maximize efficiency for the customer. (I'm not talking about just the timing table but the other custom tables that Pro-Tuners can make) while I've seen cars roll in here with ECUTek and Zero safety features. some lean as far as 13.8:1 AFR at wot with boost & zero safety features made to prevent the customer from melting the engine. others that have very good safety built in that allowed our tech to fix the issue before customer had a nuclear meltdown. Not being able to tune the car in real time is a huge bummer for ECUTEK, that feature would save us a ton of time.
__________________
Juan Vargas jvargas@fontananissan.com Motorsports Manager, Tech Support & EMS Specialist. https://www.nissanraceshop.com/wp-co...ite-Header.png |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Uprev to.....? | MannyWiner | Tuning | 17 | 07-28-2015 01:40 PM |
UpRev in DFW? | KrisL | Texas | 23 | 05-01-2015 01:58 PM |
UpRev Help please please.! | Rid3_FaM0uS | Tuning | 13 | 08-20-2013 09:22 AM |
Uprev e-tune vs dyno tuning with uprev?? | babbagandu | Tuning | 6 | 05-07-2012 10:53 PM |