Originally Posted by Awgd8 ANMVQ, were you using my 370z / g37 modified throttle table that I made, not wstar. The last one I gave you? I wonder if the
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-08-2015, 10:48 PM | #31 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Framingham MA
Posts: 2,732
Drives: 2014 Q50 AWD
Rep Power: 19 |
I was using your lastest throttle map you sent me. I'm working on rev5 tomorrow so we'll see! Getting one day closer to Saturday is getting me
__________________
14 Q50 AWD, ARK, ECUTEK (SEB), Takda, |
06-08-2015, 11:00 PM | #32 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 |
Good luck ! Pls. update us!
Have you ran your X in the 1/4 mile ( want to see the ET) I am torn between a used 2013 G37x sedan $22k with 22.5 k miles vs 2016 WRX. The price difference is about 8 grand and I already tested the reliability of the VQ. Test drove the 2015 WRX and it is definitely push me back to my seat, but in a very short time 2k-5k rpm. I could feel hitting a wall pass 5k rpm, unlike the G it keeps goin! The G sedan x is about 500 IBs heavier than the wrx. Not sure how reliable the WRX after 50k miles. BTW, stock 2015 WRX only dyno at 210 HP, but it is 500 Ibs lighter.. G37x sedan combined MPG is 18-19 WRX is 23-24 combined. Last edited by Awgd8; 06-08-2015 at 11:05 PM. |
06-09-2015, 08:53 AM | #33 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
I have a 15WRX and 14FXT which have the same motor.. I've owned the FXT for 2 years and the WRX for a year.. have a combined 80k miles.. Both vehicles abused for R&D... I love love love both of these cars. The WRX is manaul and under powered stock..FXT doesn't feel bad because the of the CVT.210 HP.. that sounds like low low mustang numbers.. When people are talking power numbers they normally discuss 'dynojet' like numbers.. The new WRX makes 250-260 STOCK.. with a flash they pickup 30whp.. I'm not sure what these Gs do in the 1/4 but the wrx isn't anything impressive and I know the G will smoke the wrx on the highway.. I'm seeing 20-30MPG on our cars but some people have reported higher. They are both very different cars.. I mean the WRX has improved in everything, even the interior but it's no G or Q!
__________________
John@vTune.us EcuTek Master Pro Tuner Visconti Tuning Webstore | Support Documents & Downloads |
|
06-09-2015, 09:55 AM | #34 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Here's what revision #4 looks like.
Car is no longer super lean.. just a tad rich so I need to take a little fuel out during higher load / WOT. For those of you wondering, I've personally seen no performance gain worth running the car 12.9AF These cars actually like a little fuel in the upper rpms, which is why you'll see me commanding more fuel as the RPMS increase A few more tweaks and then we can start working on a few other things
__________________
John@vTune.us EcuTek Master Pro Tuner Visconti Tuning Webstore | Support Documents & Downloads Last edited by visconti; 06-09-2015 at 10:07 AM. |
06-09-2015, 11:59 AM | #35 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Framingham MA
Posts: 2,732
Drives: 2014 Q50 AWD
Rep Power: 19 |
Quote:
__________________
14 Q50 AWD, ARK, ECUTEK (SEB), Takda, |
|
06-09-2015, 12:17 PM | #36 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 2,284
Drives: Tricycle
Rep Power: 589151 |
Subbed for results. I've been thinking about ECUTek in the near future.
Visconti - I have a ZEX nitrous system. Let me know if you get the details worked out in a PM. |
06-09-2015, 06:52 PM | #37 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Thanks for the input! I test drove the 2015 STI and WRX and I could feel that the WRX pushes me to my seat more at lower RPM, both with 2 passengers around 300IBS combined. I did no rev to the top of RPM band of the STI so I really do not know if it will hit a wall at 5k RPM. The new WRX looks modern - finally the interior is decent compare to the 2014 model and I like the subtle look from the side too. Regarding the G37x sedan, it is a heavy car so it does not feel very peppy, unless the RPM is pass 3k. 3 years from now, the look of the G37x is way outdated. Even today, it is a bit outdated compare to the new cars coming out. The G definitely has a better highway end power and a. 100MPH is nothing for this car. I cannot think of anything else that perform like the WRX or G37x that is worth 24 grand. I have a 2008 EX35 AWD infiniti and it will be out of warranty on Sept. next year. I just had my timing cover chain leaks repaired under warranty for $2,800. I really cannot keep a high mileage luxury car with no warranty. I wonder if it is worth putting a COBB stage one on the 2015 WRX ? Just to have a better top end and smooth everything out. Is this going to be quick enough for DD? Last edited by Awgd8; 06-09-2015 at 07:06 PM. |
|
06-09-2015, 06:54 PM | #38 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
I had a loaner Q50 AWD last month and also a Q50s AWD Hybrid 2 weeks ago. The gas one did not impress me, but the Hybrid is a blast to drive! That thing is a rocket! Very fast and effortless on the highway. From dead stop (half brake press, so it will not go to EV mode) it catapult you from 0-60 MPH in around 4.7-4.8 secs. quietly..... =) Last edited by Awgd8; 06-09-2015 at 06:59 PM. |
|
06-09-2015, 07:12 PM | #40 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
If you have more cooler months weather in your state you drive in, would it be beneficial to setup the AFR leaner? Low 13's and 12.8-12.9 for hotter state? I just noticed how my data logged AFR changes on cooler months vs hotter months using the same tune in UPREV. |
06-11-2015, 09:04 AM | #41 (permalink) | |||
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 455
Drives: Sub WRX STi
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
Quote:
I think he is! Quote:
John
__________________
John@vTune.us EcuTek Master Pro Tuner Visconti Tuning Webstore | Support Documents & Downloads |
|||
06-12-2015, 07:59 AM | #42 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Framingham MA
Posts: 2,732
Drives: 2014 Q50 AWD
Rep Power: 19 |
Let first off by say John has been great the whole time and a pleasure to work with!!
OK on to the review so far Ok guys , Been a week of driving on my ECUtek Vs UPREV and can say that it “feels” about the same, The ECUtek shifting is still something that’s lacking IMO, it will only shift firmly at WOT and high RPM’s ( An I still feel UPREV shifted better) . An having a 7 spd auto and the stock shifting logic is terrible it was something I REALLY like on my UPREV. Pretty much anything past 1/3 throttle UPREV would shift firm, and being I drive exclusively in manual mode this is important to me, and the LAZY shift is not for me. The throttle responsiveness is close but still feel UPREV has a bit of an edge here also. I finally got a 1-3 WOT pull in this morning and 1-2 felt about the same as UPREV but hitting 3rd it felt like a flat spot ? Car didn’t pull hard right away,( The shift was EH) but the RPM’s did rise up again fast kinda took a second just felt slower. I was told the tune was just about spot on 99% . John said to make it more aggressive wouldn’t do that much and the tune is safe so that’s fine with me as I want a safe tune only. I have one more flash to load but haven’t had time. Been busy with the wife( Wedding anniversary this week, MRI for my back today) so lot of things going on. I will load this up before the dyno tomorrow just so we have an apples to apples compare. I will be surprised if I make any more power tomorrow when on dyno but we’ll see. Depending on what the numbers are I’ll might sell the Ecutek but not sure. The gain if any has to justify to me to have spent $300 extra dollars for Ecutek. An the fact that I have a auto and AWD the racerom features and updates are of no use to me. Was looking to strictly make more power and enhance the cars drivability. Maybe I am expecting too much and there really is zero difference in them I don’t know, but going into the dyno tomorrow I’m not feeling too good about the $$ I spent.
__________________
14 Q50 AWD, ARK, ECUTEK (SEB), Takda, |
06-12-2015, 11:09 AM | #44 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 2,284
Drives: Tricycle
Rep Power: 589151 |
It sounds like there is a lot of room to tweak yet. Keep us posted! Thanks for the review so far.
BTW, I have a 7AT so I am very interested in how that gets worked out. |
06-12-2015, 12:22 PM | #45 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,227
Drives: 2013 370z BS 6MT
Rep Power: 174284 |
i think the stuff you're looking for you already had since you're awd. i would want someone to test this out on a manual 370z.
__________________
2 plus 2 times 2 = ? ... hint, it's not 8 Stillen CBE, Stillen Gen 3, TP's, Uprev tuned - 324whp/264tq |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finally Here! | Scone | Southern California Region | 5 | 09-23-2013 01:39 PM |
Finally Got Her | jofro6 | New 370Z Owner | 22 | 04-28-2012 10:56 PM |
Finally, my first Z! | apatter8 | New 370Z Owner | 12 | 04-18-2012 04:37 PM |
Finally got myself a Z | 2011 Nismo#91 | New Forum Member | 13 | 04-05-2011 02:23 AM |
I finally got her! | xdeslitx | 40th Anniversary 370Z | 27 | 08-14-2010 05:53 PM |