Nissan 370Z Forum  

Spring rate help?

Completely depends on corner weights and if you are trying to lean the car towards more understeer or more oversteer. On my first set of coils(soon to be installed). I

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip


Like Tree63Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2014, 04:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
Track Member
 
GSS138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 769
Drives: '12 370Z 6M Sport
Rep Power: 13
GSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Completely depends on corner weights and if you are trying to lean the car towards more understeer or more oversteer.

On my first set of coils(soon to be installed). I have opted for 10KF/12K rear. This will produce a front ride frequency of 2.0 and a rear of 2.3
2.0/2.3 = ~.86 which is on the understeer side, and is almost identical to the OEM ride frequencies. It's also almost the exact ride frequencies of the swift spec-R.

The mfgr's tune to this frequency on purpose, understeer is safe. Almost every single OEM vehicle is going to be close to this ride frequency. I figure I will stay close to OEM, but at a stiffer spring/wheel rate, as to not make too drastic of a change. The car will behave similar to it does now, but won't roll over as bad.

Now if you wanted to dial in some oversteer which is more typical of a race car setup(looser). You would bring the front rate much higher. Something like 14k/10K on oem spring location would produce

2.3/2.1 = 1.12. Which would be mild oversteer and is pretty well balanced and is probably what I will do next for a stepping stone.

The big no-no is to do something like 2.1/2.0 = ~1 as was explained to me by an engineer(this is not my math I just know the equations).

As he described it to me, anything in the range 0.9-1.1 is flirting with some real problems and can get you into trouble. You always want to aim outside of those numbers either towards understeer or towards oversteer.
__________________
Current Mods: Vorpal Weapon +5.
GSS138 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 05:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
wstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594
wstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Well, in my case I've switched to true-type rears, so I can't directly compare the ratios from the stock spring setup anyways. The rule of thumb for avoiding near-1.0 (I assume for harmonic reasons between front/rear bounce) makes sense, but I'll have to figure out how to do the freq calculations for my setup first.

My current setup is definitely oriented in the oversteer direction (not that I know the math, I just know that every single time I get close to being in trouble, it's from oversteer not understeer, even in a faster sweeping corner ), and I'm pretty comfy with that.
GSS138 likes this.
__________________
7AT Track Car!
Journal thread / Car setup details
wstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 06:22 PM   #18 (permalink)
Track Member
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 536
Drives: 03 350z 6mt
Rep Power: 16
03threefiftyz is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSS138 View Post
Completely depends on corner weights and if you are trying to lean the car towards more understeer or more oversteer.

On my first set of coils(soon to be installed). I have opted for 10KF/12K rear. This will produce a front ride frequency of 2.0 and a rear of 2.3
2.0/2.3 = ~.86 which is on the understeer side, and is almost identical to the OEM ride frequencies. It's also almost the exact ride frequencies of the swift spec-R.

The mfgr's tune to this frequency on purpose, understeer is safe. Almost every single OEM vehicle is going to be close to this ride frequency. I figure I will stay close to OEM, but at a stiffer spring/wheel rate, as to not make too drastic of a change. The car will behave similar to it does now, but won't roll over as bad.

Now if you wanted to dial in some oversteer which is more typical of a race car setup(looser). You would bring the front rate much higher. Something like 14k/10K on oem spring location would produce

2.3/2.1 = 1.12. Which would be mild oversteer and is pretty well balanced and is probably what I will do next for a stepping stone.

The big no-no is to do something like 2.1/2.0 = ~1 as was explained to me by an engineer(this is not my math I just know the equations).

As he described it to me, anything in the range 0.9-1.1 is flirting with some real problems and can get you into trouble. You always want to aim outside of those numbers either towards understeer or towards oversteer.
I think you need to go back to that engineer and have him run you through it again...you didn't grasp it the first time.

2.0f/2.3r is going to be loose, 2.3f/2.1 is pretty nuetral and 2.1/2.0 is a little soft and probably still on the nuetrul side (tending towards oversteer)....

Fwiw, my race car sits in the 2.4f/2.25 and tends towards slightly loose on corner exit and that is with no rear bar.
03threefiftyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 06:50 PM   #19 (permalink)
Premium Member Bitches
 
DEpointfive0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 14,824
Drives: a lot
Rep Power: 17151
DEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond reputeDEpointfive0 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Which one of you true type rear coils guys needs SPL toe arms?!?!?!
GSS138 and synolimit like this.
__________________
Do YOU want to know what/where I got my username from?
( Click to show/hide )
DEpointfive0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 06:56 PM   #20 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Shamu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,059
Drives: 370Z Racecar
Rep Power: 19
Shamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond reputeShamu has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintfocus View Post
Don't run the rear Hotchkis, way too stiff and most likely contributing to the inside rear tread lift. Go back to stock rear and see how it goes
Agreed im running stock nismo bar in the rear
clintfocus likes this.
__________________
Grant
Shamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 07:31 PM   #21 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
synolimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,051
Drives: 2013 Silver 370z
Rep Power: 3389
synolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond repute
Default

have to find out first. all i know right now im 57/43 weight ratio so the rear is way happy!

finally someone talking about frequency! i have no idea what youre talking about but was trying to tell someone and couldnt say it right so he had no idea what i was talking about. if you could PM we wont thread jack, i have a ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSS138 View Post
Completely depends on corner weights and if you are trying to lean the car towards more understeer or more oversteer.

On my first set of coils(soon to be installed). I have opted for 10KF/12K rear. This will produce a front ride frequency of 2.0 and a rear of 2.3
2.0/2.3 = ~.86 which is on the understeer side, and is almost identical to the OEM ride frequencies. It's also almost the exact ride frequencies of the swift spec-R.

The mfgr's tune to this frequency on purpose, understeer is safe. Almost every single OEM vehicle is going to be close to this ride frequency. I figure I will stay close to OEM, but at a stiffer spring/wheel rate, as to not make too drastic of a change. The car will behave similar to it does now, but won't roll over as bad.

Now if you wanted to dial in some oversteer which is more typical of a race car setup(looser). You would bring the front rate much higher. Something like 14k/10K on oem spring location would produce

2.3/2.1 = 1.12. Which would be mild oversteer and is pretty well balanced and is probably what I will do next for a stepping stone.

The big no-no is to do something like 2.1/2.0 = ~1 as was explained to me by an engineer(this is not my math I just know the equations).

As he described it to me, anything in the range 0.9-1.1 is flirting with some real problems and can get you into trouble. You always want to aim outside of those numbers either towards understeer or towards oversteer.
__________________
13 370z-
synolimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 08:13 PM   #22 (permalink)
Track Member
 
clintfocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: los angeles
Age: 39
Posts: 933
Drives: 370z, EK Civic, F150
Rep Power: 15
clintfocus will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamu View Post
I run 1000 lb fronts and 550 lb rears and thats not enough spring for slicks. You are way undersprung upfront. low front spring rate allowing rear to lift like that.

We are going to 1100 front and 700 rear maybe more! I drove on streets for couple years with 1000 lb springs and JRZ coilovers. Was downright comfy.
1000lbs springs are still softer then bump stops

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSS138 View Post
Would agree with all the above. The rates are low. In the pic, the front right is rolling over(as is probably the rear), and the rear sway is lifting the rear left.

Clint's suggestion is definitely the fastest, least expensive change though. Long term I would look at something more like 16kF/10KR if you otherwise like your current setup.
before any spring rates get changed around, i think that rear Hotchkis needs to go and be tested with stock. then further tuning from there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by synolimit View Post
I was told by the company I bought my 2 ways from that the front and rear rates need to be closely matched for even balance. Like if you need a harder front you might also need to step up your rear. He advised to stay within a 5-6k range unless you're a drifter then it changes. Anyone else follow this rule?

I see Shamu is at 8k difference now but would like 7k and bkleeman is within that range.
with both the weight balance of the 370 NOT being 50/50,. and the high amount of both front grip potential with sqaure tire setup, decently high levels of unsprung weight, and the wishbone suspension, i think the front really needs a good amount of rate. depending what rear rate you need depends on spring location (stock or true coilover), sway bar selection in back (large, stock, or none), power level, and LSD.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamu View Post
Agreed im running stock nismo bar in the rear
I run G37S coupe rear bar
clintfocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 08:15 PM   #23 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
wstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594
wstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Ok one more thing: I know the exact brand and type of coils on my RS1's: they're HyperCoils, and their model number system is pretty simple (they go by "free coil length", basically a coil count, the I.D., and the spring rate). So the ones I have now are 8A0500 rear (8 coil, 2.25 ID, 500 lbs/in), and 6A0650 front (6 coil, 2.25 ID, 650 lbs/in). You can see their catalog page here: http://www.hypercoils.com/skin/front...Catalog_12.jpg , but basically I can pick any reasonable rate and coil count I'd want.... do I need to change the length when I change the rate, or keep the same length as the ones I have and just change rates?
__________________
7AT Track Car!
Journal thread / Car setup details
wstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 08:30 PM   #24 (permalink)
Track Member
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 536
Drives: 03 350z 6mt
Rep Power: 16
03threefiftyz is on a distinguished road
Default

Make it easy on yourself, just get a pair of springs in 50lb increments from 600-1500lb....
andy_meng1024, GSS138 and milmast like this.
03threefiftyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 09:32 PM   #25 (permalink)
Track Member
 
GSS138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 769
Drives: '12 370Z 6M Sport
Rep Power: 13
GSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz View Post
Make it easy on yourself, just get a pair of springs in 50lb increments from 600-1500lb....
Best answer!
__________________
Current Mods: Vorpal Weapon +5.
GSS138 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 09:35 PM   #26 (permalink)
Track Member
 
GSS138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 769
Drives: '12 370Z 6M Sport
Rep Power: 13
GSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by synolimit View Post
have to find out first. all i know right now im 57/43 weight ratio so the rear is way happy!

finally someone talking about frequency! i have no idea what youre talking about but was trying to tell someone and couldnt say it right so he had no idea what i was talking about. if you could PM we wont thread jack, i have a ??
Syno, you actually setup perfectly for doing doughnuts in the snow.
__________________
Current Mods: Vorpal Weapon +5.
GSS138 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 10:07 PM   #27 (permalink)
Track Member
 
GSS138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 769
Drives: '12 370Z 6M Sport
Rep Power: 13
GSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the roughGSS138 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz View Post
I think you need to go back to that engineer and have him run you through it again...you didn't grasp it the first time.

2.0f/2.3r is going to be loose, 2.3f/2.1 is pretty nuetral and 2.1/2.0 is a little soft and probably still on the nuetrul side (tending towards oversteer)....

Fwiw, my race car sits in the 2.4f/2.25 and tends towards slightly loose on corner exit and that is with no rear bar.
350 completely and respectfully disagree. Disagree since the freq calcs include corner weights, The guy I am talking to is Gordon Benson from Koni that engineered the 2812 long body. I know Koni these days isn't the "cool kids" choice of dampers, but math is math. If you want email him at Gordon.benson@itt.com. Guy is awesome and will even get into the calculus of it.

Every post market "spring kit" out there tunes to something around .80-.85
because they can sell that product and not kill someone. Or at least not be sued for creating an "unsafe ride rate" as per the DOT.

that being said, I don't drive your car that you know intimately. I see what you are saying, because you know your car's frame, your sway bars, your tires, what you like, etc. better than I do, and are a much more experienced driver. But as for a baseline tuning point, and to understand how a suspension works(regardless of the car) the Front ride Freq/ rear ride Freq, tells you how the car is setup. <1 induced understeer. > 1 induced oversteer. That's not my opinion that's just physics. Doesn't tell you how to drive it fast, doesn't make you push the throttle when you know you maybe shouldn't, it's just a reference point.
Rangerz likes this.
__________________
Current Mods: Vorpal Weapon +5.
GSS138 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 10:19 PM   #28 (permalink)
Track Member
 
clintfocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: los angeles
Age: 39
Posts: 933
Drives: 370z, EK Civic, F150
Rep Power: 15
clintfocus will become famous soon enough
Default

DEpointfive0 likes this.
clintfocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 11:01 PM   #29 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
wstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594
wstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz View Post
Make it easy on yourself, just get a pair of springs in 50lb increments from 600-1500lb....
I'm sure I'll end up closer to that than I want to be, eventually. But the nature of my earlier question, if it wasn't clear, is more like: if I change a spring rate dramatically and want to maintain approximately the same suspension stroke and ride height, do I need to buy shorter springs when I buy stronger springs, because they won't be as compressed when the car is static?
__________________
7AT Track Car!
Journal thread / Car setup details
wstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 11:09 PM   #30 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Super Werty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: AZ
Posts: 668
Drives: '13 Sport
Rep Power: 13
Super Werty is just really niceSuper Werty is just really niceSuper Werty is just really niceSuper Werty is just really niceSuper Werty is just really nice
Send a message via ICQ to Super Werty
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkleeman View Post
Get the front as stiff as you can - you probably won't over do it. We're running between 1000 - 1200 lb/in front springs (900-1000 in the rear) with a custom swaybar made from .120 wall roll bar tube and the front still rolls over more than we'd like. See pic:

Hotchkis is the stiffest off-the-shelf bar that I know of tho, so you're left with just upping the spring rates.
Who made the sway bar? I wonder if they would sell some.

What end links do you use with this front bar?

Do you guys run a rear sway?
__________________
The Build
Super Werty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JPY - USD Rate change diddy535 The Lounge (Off Topic) 7 05-11-2013 12:49 PM
Yes or no? Please rate xbigb4ller69z Wheels & Tires 26 03-11-2010 11:53 AM
Rate Your Exhaust jpit Intake/Exhaust 22 09-29-2009 09:18 PM
Selling Eibach spring and OEM spring spia Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) 8 06-13-2009 09:18 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2