![]() |
@Mike, with 783 up front and rear in a coilover you have: front ride rate: 2.3 Hz and rear rate: 2.1 Hz 2.3/2.1 = 1.09 I think this ratio is
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 769
Drives: '12 370Z 6M Sport
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
@Mike, with 783 up front and rear in a coilover you have:
front ride rate: 2.3 Hz and rear rate: 2.1 Hz 2.3/2.1 = 1.09 I think this ratio is one of the most important things when doing the suspension voodoo math. I am using a number really close to that ratio with just lower spring rates and the OEM motion ratios. The hope is to get the same under/oversteer feel. Our OEM ratio is like .90 which is pretty standard OEM street car setup. BY using 672 front and 504(OEM rears) I will get 2.13 Hz/ 1.95 Hz = 1.09. This will prolly be a little loose till I throw a wing on. I use .62 for front motion ratio, and .62 rear(oem), or .73(Coil position) as my motion ratios. If I was going full track I would prolly move higher like you guys, but it's gonna be a while before that happens.
__________________
Current Mods: Vorpal Weapon +5. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
KW V3 New Suspension Ride Height | scruffydog | Brakes & Suspension | 0 | 11-16-2012 04:08 PM |
KW V3 Rear Ride Height | CorbinDallas | Brakes & Suspension | 24 | 08-13-2012 04:46 PM |
Tire question about sidewall height in relation to ride height... | chuckd05 | Wheels & Tires | 2 | 05-07-2011 04:03 AM |
Ride height not even on my new Z | Aaron1 | Brakes & Suspension | 17 | 01-15-2011 03:16 PM |
Stock ride height? | the_student | Brakes & Suspension | 1 | 07-05-2010 04:09 AM |