![]() |
Quote:
I don't see how a solid 28mm bar could possibly be less stiff than a 35mm tubular. |
Quote:
That matrix doesn't say anything about going from tubular to solid or vice versa. |
Quote:
A tubular design of 35mm roughly translates to 32mm solid. |
Quote:
Thanks for the info though, can never have too much knowledge. |
The Whiteline is not between the Eibach and Hotchkis. The Eibach front bar is stiffer and lighter than the Whiteline.
http://www.the370z.com/attachments/b...ars-sways2.jpg |
It is stiffer than the Stillen though.
The Eibach is much thicker than I first thought, thanks for the numbers. The spring rates for the Hotchkis rear are: 930, 1160, 1490 lbs/in (based on the 28.5mm bar) +70, 110, 170% stiffer than stock 370Z The Eibach rear sounds crazy stiff if their numbers are accurate. |
I tried the Eibach front bar for a few events last year. I'm running 285 RE-11s all around. The Eibach bar on the stiffest setting made the rear very squirrelly...lots of oversteer. I went back to the stock bar and have been happier and faster. Really, it's driver preference, most of us here can't drive the car to its capable limits and Whiteline, Eibach, or other won't "turn" us into a pro.:driving:
|
Quote:
Would you consider RE-11s to be a goo match for it, or should I look at something more aggressive? I'd like to fine tune the suspension through this current autox season, possibly adding springs into the mix. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also I thought the non-Nismo Z's were able to run in STR now. Not sure what the STR rules allow for suspension changes and what the max tire widths are but it might be worth a look. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2