Originally Posted by klubbheads DE had strong top end for what it was. It made its peak power at 6200 rpm and stayed almost flat till 6600. 6MTs that were
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-04-2010, 02:03 PM | #16 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 4,391
Drives: your mom to church
Rep Power: 296 |
Quote:
__________________
2011 Mustang 5.0 | 3.55's | Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe | Magnaflow Muffler Delete | JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs |
|
05-04-2010, 02:48 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 937
Drives: Nissan 350Z, 2004
Rep Power: 0 |
What I did read is that the ft/lbs of torque in the 370 isn't that much over the 350's. Weird. They increase the hp way over the 350's, but the ft/lbs of torque just slightlty so.
|
05-04-2010, 02:50 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 221
Drives: Very slow Nismo 370
Rep Power: 16 |
higher redline and higher peak power is the caused the tq has not increased. Higher the motor revs, less tq it has.
__________________
g35driver OG. |
05-06-2010, 09:18 AM | #21 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,800
Drives: 09 Z34-TT 6MT
Rep Power: 42 |
Not entirely, but it definitely makes it quicker to wind up to redline. On the bottom end, it feels a tad more responsive and easier to drive. I think it's something about the throttle mapping.
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Torque Specs | zero610 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 30 | 07-09-2016 03:54 PM |
flat torque? | vehl | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 14 | 08-25-2009 03:24 AM |
Torque graph | Dav | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 5 | 06-02-2009 03:15 PM |
Torque specs | import111 | Brakes & Suspension | 3 | 03-23-2009 08:14 AM |
Where's the torque?? | sbkim | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 14 | 02-02-2009 08:14 PM |