Look at my prior post. :eek:

Wasn't my argument or an insult.

So.....:sly:



Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

I saw your posts.

Not sure who you were arguing with.

That said, my perception is that having a vendor sandbox that keeps ads out, and expecting folks to excercise personal responsibility before sending money, promotes the opposite of gullability.

It's pretty easy to do your homework and figure out who not to send your money to.

Take away all the B.S about your sandbox theory and paranoia of an ad banner (which was just an example of being at my wits end) and keep it simple. By simple I mean when there is a known issue remove it, and don't let it back.

Also ads can be put up just as quickly by not having enough paying members like yourself.

You tell me? You went to Wiki and brought up ad hominem so you assumed I was arguing with you.

So vendor burns people, gets fired and is allowed back as another vendor should be par for the course here?

How can be make informed decisions when identities are hidden or just plain made up? Some of the vendors don't register with any of their states as business or corporations. How do you expect members to make any sort of reasonable decision about a potential vendor with their money?

Glad I saw this info before this thread got deleted
Thanks for the heads up

The rating system suggested seems like a pretty good idea (preserves history). Probably cost-prohibitive.

For the two guys I somehow pissed off. Well, not intentional. I just don't agree with you. Nothing personal.

I hate you. :bowrofl:


This is how things get figured out. Civil conversation...somewhat civil.
:tiphat:

Sorry if I seemed pissed off, not at all, just frustrated. As W.O.W mentioned just trying to help and falling on deaf ears.

Haha! Touché.

:tiphat:

Haha I can laugh at that. Fired from UAM? No actual proff of that. You have something out for UAM or Mike. Stealing money? You shouldn't talk unless ou have facts.. Your a lawyer you should know that.

Yours just behind the scenes and believes what everyone types an actually don't see that while picture only what you want to believe. It really doesn't get you know we're. You don't have facts but assumptions.

Fraud? What fraud? Yes I take money and continue to be on the forum? Do you see a banned status? You talk about people vendors being banned and come back being vendors? Have your looked at other companes like ******* You should have your facts. It would really help your argument .

Sin over at AJ is top notch. Not sure what issues you had with him.

Oh, and as far as ads; I already see them when I'm using my iPad.

OK Linda@LCR.

I have a problem with liars especially who hide behind computers. You took a members money claiming to sell them a genuine Zele but then once you have their money you let them know its a replica that you and Mike made. Real classy... I have facts and evidence. Just like u did that Mike was allowing you to make molds of his Zele.:thumbup:

But you are right this is funny now. It's pathetic.


Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Where is this person? And why isn't one backing up any claims? I understand it the weekend, but let's start sending out some pm's.

Let's get to the bottom of stuff.

:tiphat:

again were are your facts? which member I told that I sold a zele kit to telling it was the real one? This is just he vs she said. Facts will actually win your the argument unless you have them?!? or you just love to pick a fight?
With mike and molds of zele, facts were seen, cuz I had them and kept my proof because with out evidence, it gets you no were. :ugh2::ugh2: but idk weres yours at?

Liars that hide computers? most of the socal community and some vendors have seen me in person. I have no were to hide. Theres nothing to hide from.
If you have anger man theres therapy and counseling for it.