Official NFL 2014 season trash talking thread.

[Haboob]

Originally Posted by JARblue

Only by the NFL rulebook...





Although the puppy and Clydesdale Budweiser one definitely tugged at my heartstrings :tear:

No, by the actual call. It was a catch, no two-ways about it.


Meh, they've played out that stupid puppy and clydesdale commercial. Time for something new.

And the stupid animal lovers got the GoDaddy ad pulled. ******* twats. It's a commercial! It's not real life!

[JARblue]

Originally Posted by Haboob

No, by the actual call. It was a catch, no two-ways about it.


Meh, they've played out that stupid puppy and clydesdale commercial. Time for something new.

And the stupid animal lovers got the GoDaddy ad pulled. ******* twats. It's a commercial! It's not real life!

You are so biased lol. According to the rule book, it was incomplete. A lunge is not defined in the rule book as a football move, so you have no argument. I don't disagree with you that it should have been ruled a catch. The rules should be changed. But the refs made the correct call according to the rules. No two ways about it.

I haven't seen a puppy and Clydesdale commercial like that one before. Sure they have puppies and stuff and they're cute and all. But nothing like the lost puppy story. I'm sorry you have a heart of stone

What GoDaddy commercial? Was it any good?

[exsanity]

Originally Posted by JARblue

You are so biased lol. According to the rule book, it was incomplete. A lunge is not defined in the rule book as a football move, so you have no argument. I don't disagree with you that it should have been ruled a catch. The rules should be changed. But the refs made the correct call according to the rules. No two ways about it.

I haven't seen a puppy and Clydesdale commercial like that one before. Sure they have puppies and stuff and they're cute and all. But nothing like the lost puppy story. I'm sorry you have a heart of stone

What GoDaddy commercial? Was it any good?

Is a move up field not considered a "football move"?

[JARblue]

Originally Posted by exsanity

Is a move up field not considered a "football move"?

Not if you don't have your balance. That was the issue according to several rules experts the NFL Network had talking about it.

[Haboob]

Originally Posted by JARblue

You are so biased lol. According to the rule book, it was incomplete. A lunge is not defined in the rule book as a football move, so you have no argument. I don't disagree with you that it should have been ruled a catch. The rules should be changed. But the refs made the correct call according to the rules. No two ways about it.

I haven't seen a puppy and Clydesdale commercial like that one before. Sure they have puppies and stuff and they're cute and all. But nothing like the lost puppy story. I'm sorry you have a heart of stone

What GoDaddy commercial? Was it any good?

A step/turn is considered a football move, which is what he did. That's a catch. No bias, by the book it was a catch.


Budweiser did the puppy/clydesdale commercial last year, and I believe the year before.

The GoDaddy one was making fun of the Budweiser one and selling puppies online or something (which ******* happens, PETA, and it's perfectly fine).

[exsanity]

[JARblue]

Originally Posted by Haboob

A step/turn is considered a football move, which is what he did. That's a catch. No bias, by the book it was a catch.

lol you're like talking to a Nissan dealer

You're correct a step/turn is considered a football move, but only if you're not still in the process of the catch. If you don't regain your balance, taking an extra step does not count as a separate football move or act. He was continuing to fall as part of the catch process, despite there being a lunge in there as well. Can't blame the refs. Seriously. You have no argument.

The NFL actually used this catch by Calvin Johnson in 2010 as part of an educational video to explain the rules. Fuckin stupid idiots. Hopefully this ridiculous rule screwing Dallas out of a playoff game will finally be enough to get it fixed.