2012 NFL Thread

[dmhenderson]

Originally Posted by PapoZalsa

Don't worry Steve you are disgruntled now but it will pass. Do you need a hug? Call Shaquad...

Clearly you should spam more emotes in your posts to make your point.

LOL!@!!!!!!!1!! jUaghaghaghg

[shadoquad]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

Clearly you should spam more emotes in your posts to make your point.

LOL!@!!!!!!!1!! jUaghaghaghg

There's a set limit of emoticons that users can put up per post.

3 is not even close to it.

just fyi

[Red__Zed]

Originally Posted by shadoquad

There's a set limit of emoticons that users can put up per post.

3 is not even close to it.

just fyi

:: iagree::ia gree::iagr ee::iagree :: iagree::ia gree::iagr ee::iagree :: iagree::ia gree::iagr ee::iagree :

[dmhenderson]

Originally Posted by shadoquad

There's a set limit of emoticons that users can put up per post.

3 is not even close to it.

just fyi

This logic leads to arguments like, "Well hell, there's no reason we have to stop pooping in our pants once we learn how to use a toilet. LET'S ALL **** OUR PANTS BECAUSE WE CAN"

[m4a1mustang]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

This logic leads to arguments like, "Well hell, there's no reason we have to stop pooping in our pants once we learn how to use a toilet. LET'S ALL **** OUR PANTS BECAUSE WE CAN"

I have the stomach flu so this might happen.

[shadoquad]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

This logic leads to arguments like, "Well hell, there's no reason we have to stop pooping in our pants once we learn how to use a toilet. LET'S ALL **** OUR PANTS BECAUSE WE CAN"

Not exactly?

I was just pointing out that putting emoticons in a post can look much more excessive than just ""

But let's get back on topic, plz, unless you'd like to nitpick further