Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Sports (http://www.the370z.com/sports/)
-   -   2012 NFL Thread (http://www.the370z.com/sports/49621-2012-nfl-thread.html)

b1adesofcha0s 09-24-2012 11:20 PM

ESPN had an excellent explanation of the rule for this situation. Normally if 2 eligible receivers take simultaneous possession of the ball (i.e. they both catch it at the same time) the catch goes in favor of the offense. However, if one of the receivers establish possession first and then the second receiver gets joined possession of the football, then the catch goes in the favor of the first receiver. That's exactly what happened with Jennings getting possession of the ball first.

Also, good call by McCarthy about not commenting on the refs. The league really can't say anything to him now.

Infamous 09-24-2012 11:20 PM

Unbelievable. Bring the real refs back!!!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

6MT 09-24-2012 11:20 PM

Wow, was that a joke! I can't believe what my NFL has become. So sad... So sad.

MC 09-24-2012 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo89 (Post 1930489)
Packers got robbed. These Refs NEED to go!!!! Ray Lewis was right, they are taking away the integrity of the game. they obviously have no clue what they are doing.

how is a ball NOT intercepted when the defender has BOTH hands on it AND against his body? while the reciever PUSHED a defender to the ground and got 1 hand on the ball AFTER they went to the ground?!

holy F*ck. this needs to straighten up lol



yeah they just explained the simultaneous catch rule on ESPN and that made it even more clear that it wasnt that..

b1adesofcha0s 09-24-2012 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC (Post 1930506)
yeah they just explained the simultaneous catch rule on ESPN and that made it even more clear that it wasnt that..

Quote:

Originally Posted by b1adesofcha0s (Post 1930503)
ESPN had an excellent explanation of the rule for this situation. Normally if 2 eligible receivers take simultaneous possession of the ball (i.e. they both catch it at the same time) the catch goes in favor of the offense. However, if one of the receivers establish possession first and then the second receiver gets joined possession of the football, then the catch goes in the favor of the first receiver. That's exactly what happened with Jennings getting possession of the ball first.

Also, good call by McCarthy about not commenting on the refs. The league really can't say anything to him now.

Yup I explained it right here. Looks like twitter has been blowing up with responses from other players and all of them say the same thing.

frost 09-24-2012 11:38 PM

http://www.the370z.com/members/frost...547034179.jpeg

b1adesofcha0s 09-24-2012 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 1930520)

That was the actual conversation they had. True story. :icon17:

dastaco 09-24-2012 11:40 PM

Just thinking out loud, but shouldn't the NFL have to answer to every Packers shareholder that wants to know how/why their team lost off of what is obviously a bad call? I mean, this game could have playoff implications which would impact team revenues... if i'm a shareholder I'd call the NFL to the carpet on this one.

dastaco 09-24-2012 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 1930520)

I just laughed out loud, well done.

b1adesofcha0s 09-24-2012 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dastaco (Post 1930522)
Just thinking out loud, but shouldn't the NFL have to answer to every Packers shareholder that wants to know how/why their team lost off of what is obviously a bad call? I mean, this game could have playoff implications which would impact team revenues... if i'm a shareholder I'd call the NFL to the carpet on this one.

It's funny, I was actually just thinking the exact same thing. :tup:

shadoquad 09-24-2012 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 1930520)

:icon18:


Not taking away from the Seahawks. They played a great game.

But there were some BAD calls at the end of that game. Horrid.

Hell, the Pack got the advantage on a bad call on their last scoring drive. The integrity of the game is on shaky ground.

m4a1mustang 09-24-2012 11:44 PM

IIRC the shares the packers sold are a novelty and don't represent actual ownership in the team.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

dastaco 09-24-2012 11:45 PM

Of all of the teams to lose because of a blown call, the packers are the best option. Any other team has one owner that can just call old Roger and complain, now he is gonna have to deal with an angry public.

shadoquad 09-24-2012 11:49 PM

At least the pack showed great class by going out for the meaningless pat. Pete carroll could have also been classy by ordering a kneeldown, but whatevs, a farce is a farce.

m4a1mustang 09-24-2012 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadoquad (Post 1930527)
:icon18:


Not taking away from the Seahawks. They played a great game.

But there were some BAD calls at the end of that game. Horrid.

Hell, the Pack got the advantage on a bad call on their last scoring drive. The integrity of the game is on shaky ground.

What integrity?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2