07-21-2013, 10:50 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sacratomato
Posts: 309
Drives: your mama wild.
Rep Power: 13
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saber
the 18-200 is not good for low light, like it seemed you wanted to take in your previous post. i'd go for the 35mm/1.8 or 50mm/1.8 depending on what you're shooting with, IMO.
also - a decent flash helps if you don't have a tripod; if you can remote it somewhere, even better. but i'm still getting used to shooting in lowlight as well, so take my thoughts with grains of salt.
|
I have the 18-200 lens and I think it does a pretty good job in low light. A f1.4 lens is obviously going to be faster but I was pretty impressed with the 18-200mm. BUt then, it's the only one I have for now.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
1787Likes
Threaded Mode
