![]() |
If you don't want to spend $$$$ on a macro lens, I'd head out and buy a set of extension tubes. About $50-$100 and worth every penny if you're still just experimenting.
|
Now here's a tree fungus I shot handheld with the same camera and lens at f5.6 ISO500 and 60mm. It's not as sharp as LunaZ's sunflower but still it's pretty sharp. Lots of detail. My sunflowers were shot handheld while sitting in the car looking out the window, I think. I had the tripod out that day but I don't think I used it on the sunflowers now that I think about it.
I think maybe the high f-stop on the sunflowers and the fact that they're backlighted took away some detail. Anybody else have an idea what's going on? http://i1313.photobucket.com/albums/...psaf2d9504.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Behind the scenes, goofing on Terry Richardson: Censored image, but might still be NSFW
|
Quote:
I'm using a Canon 5D MkII. This shot was with a 70-200 f/4L at 200mm, 1/800s, ISO 100, f/8. I used Lightroom to make a few tweaks to the sharpness of the bee and tweaked the colour a little bit with a VSCO filter that mimics Fujifilm. |
Quote:
You could change your metering to spot and expose for the dark centers of the sunflowers, but that might blow everything else out. You could add flash or use a reflector to add fill light the shadowed centers of the flowers. It would probably be easiest to move and find a different sunflower that's facing the right way. ;) |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's the Enterprise!!! |
Quote:
It's such a newb move, but I have to learn somehow! |
I usually stay in manual mode on 100ISO, and play with the exposure times, usually 20-25 seconds. I was actually referring to the settings in lightroom hahaha, but I do that with the camera too sometimes. I need to learn more about metering and stuff like that now.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2