Hey guys, I'm looking to pick up a DSLR in the next week or so, and was just hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at. I'm
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-07-2011, 10:24 PM | #1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120 |
DSLR advice
Hey guys, I'm looking to pick up a DSLR in the next week or so, and was just hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at. I'm currently looking at a Canon T3, since my brother has an XSi that he has been pleased with, but was curious if you had any other recommendations.
I'm not planning on doing anything too serious in terms of shooting, and I'm not a terribly talented photographer, but I would like something that will turn out some decent quality pictures. I'm looking to spend less than $600 on the camera with a lens. Thanks for the help. |
03-08-2011, 01:17 AM | #4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,134
Drives: 2009 Touring Sp Nav
Rep Power: 17 |
The T3 is an ok choice, but with your budget you may want to consider an Olympus E620 two lens kit. You give up a little in low light coverage for more flexibility in lens zoom coverage.
The Canon 18-55 is a good lens for a kit lens, but the Olympus kit lenses are considered some of the best. With the two lens kit, you get a pretty good zoom to cover some more distant shots. If you are mainly interested in indoor / landscape / local scenery shooting, the 18-55 is probably fine. Of course, if you can borrow some stuff from your brother, that makes the Canon more attractive. Don't forget that you may want to purchase some accessories in addition to the basic kit - at least a couple of memory cards, possibly a spare battery, and a card reader for your computer if you don't already have one.
__________________
2014 Cayman S PDK Sport Chrono White/Black Was 2009 370Z Touring Sport+Nav 7AT Metallic Black/Persimmon Was 1991 NSX Auto Black/Black |
03-20-2011, 10:34 AM | #5 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
in response to the post above^^ i've never been a big fan of olympus DSLR's, they aren't bad, i would just go with a nikon or canon personally. the T3 is a really nice rebel camera, and it's great bang for buck. that's what i'd recommend regardless of my personal brand preference
__________________
Patrick // 06 Frontier 6spd Nismosis // Mods: Uprev Tuned @ Z1 Motorsports: 257whp & 292 ft lbs 09 Pontiac G8 GXP // M6 // Sunroof // Tint... For now |
03-20-2011, 08:54 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Base Member
|
If you could save up a little more, I'd go with the canon t2i kit. Any beginner kit from either canon or nikon should be good enough.
Expensive bodies/lens are useless if you don't know how to use them to the best of their abilities. I've had an old sony a350 for a long time and that was the camera I basically learned on before swapping out to a canon 7d. Also, don't be afraid of buying used equipment - as long as you can test it in person, this is a real good way to get some decent stuff for less. My vote is for the canon t2i kit: Amazon.com: Canon EOS Rebel T2i 18 MP CMOS APS-C Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens: Camera & Photo or if you really want to stay within your budget, the nikon d3100 kit. Amazon.com: Nikon D3100 14.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens: Electronics |
03-20-2011, 09:43 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,059
Drives: slowwww
Rep Power: 29 |
Quote:
OP, The best DSLR won't give you the result you want if you don't know how to use it. My uncle for example, just got the Canon 60D with a nice lens and acc. He comes up to me and says he spent over $1,600 on his set-up and his pictures don't look any better than his point and shoot. He had no clue what any of the controls meant and just bought it because it was expensive. I guess what I'm trying to say is that you don't need a $600 camera to take great pictures...but it does make it easier if you know what your doing. Use a tripod anytime you want sharp pictures and take outdoor pictures only at dawn or dusk. Two simple advice that will make dull, flat and blurry pictures look 10x better. I was personally thinking about getting a non-DSLR Nikon P7000, P300 or the Canon G12 to add to my library. There are times when a DSLR is just too cumbersome to lug around all the time. The ones I mention give you manual controls, portability and you can still be creative. If you want to jump into a DSLR, be prepared to have a lighter wallet. You'll be wanting better glass before you know it. The Canon T3 or Nikon D3100 are my top choices if you want to buy a new entry level. A Nikon D90 or Canon T2i if you want to go used. Absoulutely nothing wrong with going the pre-owned route. I would buy it from a reputable camera store like B&H or somewhere local though.
__________________
[09][MB][6-Spd MT][Touring][Stillen Gen III][K&N][Borla CBE][Evo-R] |
|
04-13-2011, 03:58 PM | #9 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,211
Drives: 2010 6MT Sport pkg.
Rep Power: 26 |
Get a Canon and then immediately get the Canon f/1.4 50mm lens for your camera.
__________________
Pearl White 2010 370Z Sport, Stillen CBE, tint, K&N drop-in filters, GT-R start button, Kenwood DNX-6980 with backup cam, LED bulbs, Raceseng shift knob. |
04-13-2011, 05:16 PM | #10 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Irvine
Posts: 1,682
Drives: 13 PW sport 6mt
Rep Power: 18 |
Totally agree with cmike2780. I don't think you're actually looking for a dslr unless you truly need high ISO and high control of your DOF. If you're not interested in those and just want high contrast and high res pictures then a high end digital cam will be easier to use, easier to carry around, less conspicuous and probably give you better pictures because you're not spending so much time fideling with it.
Most people who have dSLRs use it for specific purposes. Having an interchangeable lens system gives a high level of control at the expense of practicality. If you want to take your camera for vacation or just get a couple shots of your car every once in a while, grab a p7000 or other brand equivalent. |
04-24-2011, 07:43 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NorCal, USA
Posts: 5
Drives: 370Z PG+Tour+Sp+Nav
Rep Power: 16 |
It's a daunting choice with new bodies being relased so frequently these days.
If I were in your shoes and starting on a lean budget....I'd look at getting a body second hand (but almost new, someone who didn't have it long, is still in mint condition), skipping the crappy kit lenses that come with them, and then seeing what you have left over for one of these.... - 50mm (75mm on a Nikon DX crop body, 80mm on Canon EF-S) - 35mm (~52mm on a Nikon, 56mm on Canon) Not sure what your level of knowledge is, so skip past this bit if you're already up to speed. Nikon and Canon have 'cropped' sensor camera bodies, and full frame. At your budget you're definitely in the former category. This means that whatever lens you see (35mm, 50mm etc) you need to multiply that by the 'crop factor' which varies from brand to brand. Nikon = 1.5x (50mm = 75mm), Canon = 1.6x (50mm = 80mm). In general terms a 45mm to 50mm lens is roughly what your eyes see. It's a good compromise between wide angle and telephone lenses. At 80mm (a 50mm lens on a budget Canon body) you'll be at a great focal length for doing portraits, but will suffer big time if you need wide angle shots. So what to do? Consider the 35mm which then becomes ~52mm/Nikon and 56mm/Canon. Why bother with one of these lenses? They're dirt cheap. Both Nikon and Canon produce a 50mm f1.8 lens for around $140-$150. Bad timing though - photography prices have leapt up big time lately. You could pick up that lens for $99 six months ago. If you're patient, the prices will settle down again at some point. Why get a cheap 50mm lens? It'll free up some budget to get a zoom lens for one thing (another topic entirely). But the big advantage is having that f1.8 (or the f1.4 version if you can stretch it - I have the f1.2L but that's almost $2K) which allows you to 1) shoot in low light, and 2) produce the great out-of-focus (bokeh) effect that you see in 'good photos'. Right off the bat you'll be able to take photos of people or cars and isolate them in the image by blurring the background. For only $99-$150? Bargain. Feel free to ping me directly. I don't log-in that often but I'll pick up your messages when I do. Cheers. |
04-26-2011, 07:16 PM | #12 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120 |
Thanks for all the thoughts guys. I just placed an order for a Nikon d3100 and the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G, and 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR lenses. Hopefully it will provide a good start for me getting into photography.
|
04-26-2011, 10:49 PM | #13 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
congrats! be sure to post pics frequently and put on your thick skin and listen to advice. we're here to help!
__________________
Patrick // 06 Frontier 6spd Nismosis // Mods: Uprev Tuned @ Z1 Motorsports: 257whp & 292 ft lbs 09 Pontiac G8 GXP // M6 // Sunroof // Tint... For now |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Lens for Nikon DSLR? | tmjohansen | Photography | 5 | 01-25-2011 05:54 PM |
Winter Prep + New DSLR | toxik | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 8 | 11-27-2010 06:16 PM |
Looking for advice on getting a Z | toxik | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 20 | 02-11-2010 05:00 PM |
My moving Part out, BRAND NEW canon DSLR bag, and LOTS OF GAMES, movies, and more !!! | k20z3 | Misc Items for sale (No Z stuff) | 7 | 07-06-2009 04:32 PM |