Photography Chat Version 1.0

k20z3 · 09-20-2011, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKYStormFront

yea the 85 f/1.2 was teh secks on my old 5D... what an amazing lens. too bad they can't get the AF to work well (at least not yet).

haha, I know its hit or miss, and by hit or miss like the ******* grand canyon

Skeeterbop · 09-10-2011, 11:54 AM

I was about to ask what FF meant, then i figured must mean Full Frame.

Alchemy · 09-10-2011, 12:47 PM

What prime lens are you guys using?? I dont have one and Im not too familiar w them.

Skeeterbop · 09-10-2011, 06:26 PM

I'm using a 35mm f/2 Nikkor lens. Generally they offer sharper images than a zoom although i think the gap is closing. You also have to move more since you can't zoom in or out. I want to get more but money is limited for my photography budget.

Alchemy · 09-10-2011, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skeeterbop

I'm using a 35mm f/2 Nikkor lens. Generally they offer sharper images than a zoom although i think the gap is closing. You also have to move more since you can't zoom in or out. I want to get more but money is limited for my photography budget.

That sounds like a pretty nice lens. What did it cost???

Im also looking for a budget macro if anyone has any suggestions.

k20z3 · 09-10-2011, 06:36 PM

I absolutely HATE photomatix shots. They're so over done, and the HDR isn't appealing no ones eyes can see that many stops of light... they were cool for a hot 5 mins

Alchemy · 09-10-2011, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k20z3

I absolutely HATE photomatix shots. They're so over done, and the HDR isn't appealing no ones eyes can see that many stops of light... they were cool for a hot 5 mins

I think HDR is pretty darn neat. Its gotta be fun to play around with. I want to get into it.

Skeeterbop · 09-10-2011, 08:51 PM

I like HDR, Some photos look really good with that real obvious look that photomatix makes. Like that one of the border crossing it almost looks painted instead of a photo. Others look much better with a more subtle HDR process. Each person has their own style they like. I really wish I had a copy of photoshop to use for HDR but I just can't justify the cost at the momemnt. Same for photomatix. I prefer to get the exposure as good as possible and use as little touchup as possible.

Alchemy · 09-10-2011, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skeeterbop

I like HDR, Some photos look really good with that real obvious look that photomatix makes. Like that one of the border crossing it almost looks painted instead of a photo. Others look much better with a more subtle HDR process. Each person has their own style they like. I really wish I had a copy of photoshop to use for HDR but I just can't justify the cost at the moment. Same for photomatix. I prefer to get the exposure as good as possible and use as little touchup as possible.

I agree. Using as little touch up as possible is the best way to go about photo taking as it involves more skill in using the camera, which I appreciate. Although I also think that editing can give you more creative freedom, which is fun for any artist. To me HDR blurs the line between reality. It makes photos look like surreal paintings which I think is a fun creative outlet for photographers. As I have stated Im far from a pro, I come from a drawing background. I can see how hardcore photographers wouldnt like HDR as it is too processed and seems like you need less skill as a photog to create a HDR shot. Though I do believe the end results are beautiful and can create a great sense of emotion within the picture. I def see how it could be a love/hate thing in the photo community.

wilsonp · 09-10-2011, 09:18 PM

You might want to check out PaintShop Pro Photo - I just saw the new version is out supposedly with more advanced HDR tools.

Skeeterbop · 09-10-2011, 09:32 PM

$360
Nikon Wide Angle AF Nikkor 35mm f/2.0D Autofocus Lens 1923 B&H

Alchemy · 09-10-2011, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skeeterbop

$360
Nikon Wide Angle AF Nikkor 35mm f/2.0D Autofocus Lens 1923 B&H

Looks like a GREAT deal!! Are primes usually cheaper than auto focus lenes? I assume so since the capabilities are limited.

HKYStormFront · 09-11-2011, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alchemy

Looks like a GREAT deal!! Are primes usually cheaper than auto focus lenes? I assume so since the capabilities are limited.

most still have AF, just no zoom. that's not always true. prices of all lenses just depend on what f-stop (how low) they can go and the quality of glass used. in the canon lineup there are three different 50mm primes. the f/1.8 is only $125, the f/1.4 is $375-ish, the f/1.2 (with L glass) is $1530. for the average buyer, the f/1.4 is a great buy but the f/1.2 is where it's at if you want the best possible image in that lens range.

Nitex · 09-11-2011, 10:49 AM

I was all about primes, 35mm F1.8, 105mm F2.8, 300mm F4. And my Tokina 11-16 F2.8 is basically a short range prime. I recently picked up the 16-85mm Nikkor for a general purpose walk around and.. its ok. Sharpness is good, with my sb700 an VR i do decent with it in low light. I'm just not sure i want to switch out a 24, 35, 50, 85 all day long. I do want a 50 1.2 though. I demo'd one out in the store and liked it

Next lens on my list is the 70-200 VR ii. While the majority love this lens, a few claim its not worth its $2400 price tag. I will soon find out.

If anyone is interested i have added alot of images to my photostream. May want to pass by the recent pet and farm photos.

Flickr: nitex08's Photostream

^ Taken with a 17-50 2.8 tamron i no longer have hah.

Alchemy · 09-12-2011, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitex

I was all about primes, 35mm F1.8, 105mm F2.8, 300mm F4. And my Tokina 11-16 F2.8 is basically a short range prime. I recently picked up the 16-85mm Nikkor for a general purpose walk around and.. its ok. Sharpness is good, with my sb700 an VR i do decent with it in low light. I'm just not sure i want to switch out a 24, 35, 50, 85 all day long. I do want a 50 1.2 though. I demo'd one out in the store and liked it

Next lens on my list is the 70-200 VR ii. While the majority love this lens, a few claim its not worth its $2400 price tag. I will soon find out.

If anyone is interested i have added alot of images to my photostream. May want to pass by the recent pet and farm photos.

Flickr: nitex08's Photostream

^ Taken with a 17-50 2.8 tamron i no longer have hah.

I shoot w a 16-85 nikkor. Thats all I have besides my fisheye. Im interested in getting a prime now.

09-10-2011, 11:54 AM	#2 (permalink)
Skeeterbop A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Fort Bliss, TX Age: 41 Posts: 1,440 Drives: 2011 GM 370 base SP Rep Power: 17	I was about to ask what FF meant, then i figured must mean Full Frame. __________________ Srenity: "Yeah no rest needed to spread the love when your 20 that's for sure...."

09-10-2011, 12:47 PM	#3 (permalink)
Alchemy A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jersey Age: 45 Posts: 4,855 Drives: to acquire tickets Rep Power: 3525	What prime lens are you guys using?? I dont have one and Im not too familiar w them. __________________ Ryan 314WHP \| 260LB-FT \| STILLEN \| KONI \| SWIFT \| STOPTECH \| Z1 \| PROJECT MU \| CNT \| UPREV \| FORGESTAR \| BRIDGESTONE \| PWJDM \| ENEOS \| MOTUL

09-10-2011, 06:26 PM	#4 (permalink)
Skeeterbop A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Fort Bliss, TX Age: 41 Posts: 1,440 Drives: 2011 GM 370 base SP Rep Power: 17	I'm using a 35mm f/2 Nikkor lens. Generally they offer sharper images than a zoom although i think the gap is closing. You also have to move more since you can't zoom in or out. I want to get more but money is limited for my photography budget. __________________ Srenity: "Yeah no rest needed to spread the love when your 20 that's for sure...."

09-10-2011, 06:36 PM	#6 (permalink)
k20z3 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2009 Location: Denver CO Age: 34 Posts: 2,146 Drives: 2006 Civic SI HFP Rep Power: 406	I absolutely HATE photomatix shots. They're so over done, and the HDR isn't appealing no ones eyes can see that many stops of light... they were cool for a hot 5 mins __________________ 2006 RALLYE RED HONDA CIVIC SI HFP Clint's Helpful Photoshop Hints!

09-10-2011, 08:51 PM	#8 (permalink)
Skeeterbop A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Fort Bliss, TX Age: 41 Posts: 1,440 Drives: 2011 GM 370 base SP Rep Power: 17	I like HDR, Some photos look really good with that real obvious look that photomatix makes. Like that one of the border crossing it almost looks painted instead of a photo. Others look much better with a more subtle HDR process. Each person has their own style they like. I really wish I had a copy of photoshop to use for HDR but I just can't justify the cost at the momemnt. Same for photomatix. I prefer to get the exposure as good as possible and use as little touchup as possible. __________________ Srenity: "Yeah no rest needed to spread the love when your 20 that's for sure...."

09-10-2011, 09:18 PM	#10 (permalink)
wilsonp A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Virginia Posts: 1,134 Drives: 2009 Touring Sp Nav Rep Power: 17	You might want to check out PaintShop Pro Photo - I just saw the new version is out supposedly with more advanced HDR tools. __________________ 2014 Cayman S PDK Sport Chrono White/Black Was 2009 370Z Touring Sport+Nav 7AT Metallic Black/Persimmon Was 1991 NSX Auto Black/Black

09-10-2011, 09:32 PM	#11 (permalink)
Skeeterbop A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Fort Bliss, TX Age: 41 Posts: 1,440 Drives: 2011 GM 370 base SP Rep Power: 17	$360 Nikon Wide Angle AF Nikkor 35mm f/2.0D Autofocus Lens 1923 B&H __________________ Srenity: "Yeah no rest needed to spread the love when your 20 that's for sure...."

09-11-2011, 10:49 AM	#14 (permalink)
Nitex Track Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Seattle Posts: 848 Drives: '13 GTI Stage 2 UNI Rep Power: 17	I was all about primes, 35mm F1.8, 105mm F2.8, 300mm F4. And my Tokina 11-16 F2.8 is basically a short range prime. I recently picked up the 16-85mm Nikkor for a general purpose walk around and.. its ok. Sharpness is good, with my sb700 an VR i do decent with it in low light. I'm just not sure i want to switch out a 24, 35, 50, 85 all day long. I do want a 50 1.2 though. I demo'd one out in the store and liked it Next lens on my list is the 70-200 VR ii. While the majority love this lens, a few claim its not worth its $2400 price tag. I will soon find out. If anyone is interested i have added alot of images to my photostream. May want to pass by the recent pet and farm photos. Flickr: nitex08's Photostream ^ Taken with a 17-50 2.8 tamron i no longer have hah. __________________ 2013 Drivers ED GTI \| Stage 2 Unitronic Last edited by Nitex; 09-11-2011 at 10:58 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Will there be a V8 version?	sbsmoov	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	42	09-15-2011 12:23 PM
Photography in Houston	jennyt71	Texas	1	09-22-2010 03:24 PM
Some photography	Greasy	Photography	22	09-29-2009 09:30 AM
How about a real time chat?	Pushing_Tin	The370Z.com Feedback, Suggestions & Questions	28	07-23-2009 11:04 PM

**Photography Chat** Version 1.0

Photography Chat Version 1.0