11-12-2014, 04:35 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370
This is why I hate car and driver and think it's the worst automotive publication.
The ranked the AMG GTS #2 amongst $100,000+ sports cars. It hasn't even been tested yet. No one knows what it will do against anything. It's pure speculation. So how do you rank the GT-S #2. It could be #1 or #10? We just don't know? So how does C&D make these tabulations? I would really love to know?
Front-Mid-Engine Club
|
And why is the Jag ranked 4th when they claim it's like the GTS, but better looking, and on par with a 911 turbo in performance, but at a fraction of the price? 
I call shenanigans on the entire list! 
On that note -- wow, the GT-R costs up to 150 grand now, huh 
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
31Likes
Hybrid Mode
