2016 Alpha platform Camaro

UNKNOWN_370 · 12-22-2015, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang

I don't think anything has been skewed intentionally. When I do a build of the Camaro using Chevy's employee pricing (what I would pay) I come out to just under $43,000. If I build a Mustang using invoice pricing (the maximum I would pay) I come out to $39,000. That's a $4,000 difference right there.

No matter what, if I configure the SS/GT in the way I would order them, the Camaro is always more expensive. I agree that you do get more options in the Camaro which adds to the price, but still, that's real money.

I don't see any attempt to appeal to any fanboys. I think you're just splitting hairs, to be honest.

You have to understand that this is just a kid on Youtube who reviews cars. I don't think he has a fact checking team to make sure every number he keeps in his head is spot on.

Not quite splitting hairs at all. It is skewed because his words were. His ecoboost comes in at 33,000 and a comparable Camaro is $5,000 more. I'm talking on the side of the ecoboost and I am not splitting hairs. I brought completely researched FACTS.
It's OK to prefer the mustang. I really think from an aesthetics standpoint. It's give and take between the two cars. But the Chevy 4 banger is more than competitive and sub v8 mustang isn't quite the value he expressed it as.

He's been reviewing cars a long time n he's one of my favorite reviewers. If he's gonna make a "value" statement" on his ecoboost. It better be factual Because, he's making himself an authority on the topic

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2016 camaro concept?	UNKNOWN_370	Other Vehicles	5	10-31-2013 04:33 AM
New Nissan Platform (240SX?)	m3chhawk	Other Vehicles	4	10-22-2013 11:04 AM
GTR Alpha 12	Akmcmahon	Other Vehicles	9	04-10-2013 03:04 PM
platform of the new Honda NSX	Falcor	Other Vehicles	5	02-09-2011 04:10 PM
AMS Alpha 10 GTR R35 9 sec	AsmMugen	Southern California Region	0	11-10-2010 07:35 PM