![]() |
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mbn4LgwpT6A Good video subaruwrxfan posted today. He is right that similarly configured there is about a $5k difference with the Camaro being more expensive. Of course
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
First off, if we're comparing his facts to the Chevy turbo. He's off 0-60/quarter mile (manual) Mustang ecoboost 5.5 seconds/13.9 seconds Mustang v6 5.5 seconds/14.1 seconds. Camaro 2.0T 5.6 seconds/ 14.0 seconds Camaro v6 5.1 seconds 13.7 seconds Weight Mustang ecoboost 3,532lbs Mustang v6 3,526lbs Camaro turbo 3,400lbs Camaro v6 3,339 lbs Mustang ecoboost premium base price Approx $30,500 Camaro 2.0T 2LT (Premium pkg equiv) 29,800 Camaro v6 2LT 32,790 Being that the Camaro v6 performance is greatly superior to the mustang v6 or turbo. The Chevy turbo is comparable to both mustang models. Secondly, the difference in weight in turbo models is 132lbs. Anything under 75lbs is almost equal, over 75lbs IMHO is a fair bit small difference, but over 125lbs is a decent difference. There's a 221lb difference between the v6. That's SIGNIFICANT I view both turbos equally as you can't configure a mustang v6 with much. It's a base car in Ford where in Camaro 4 and 6 are more performance choices than base options. Base cars in both are 1LT packages. Not so much engines. I configured a mustang, equally loaded to a turbo 4 mustang and the Camaro with manual transmission was Approx $36,000 the mustang was $38,000 and the v6 was approximately $40,000. So I found the pricing perspective to have a lot of bias and subjectivity to the opinion. But when you load both cars out. You really see that the difference is miniscule. And at base price, you get more in your Camaro standard than you do in your Mustang Everything else is his opinion, but facts were kind of skewed to show bias as to appease mustang fanboys. SS guise, weights narrow up significantly against the GT. The SS is only 44 lbs lighter which is miniscule. But the Camaro engineering exceeds mustang significantly. I will update on Max loaded prices momentarily
__________________
Favorite Quote. "I'm not gonna kill you... I'm just gonna Bash Your Face In" Jack Nicholson-"The Shining". 1980 Last edited by UNKNOWN_370; 12-22-2015 at 09:17 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2016 camaro concept? | UNKNOWN_370 | Other Vehicles | 5 | 10-31-2013 04:33 AM |
New Nissan Platform (240SX?) | m3chhawk | Other Vehicles | 4 | 10-22-2013 11:04 AM |
GTR Alpha 12 | Akmcmahon | Other Vehicles | 9 | 04-10-2013 03:04 PM |
platform of the new Honda NSX | Falcor | Other Vehicles | 5 | 02-09-2011 04:10 PM |
AMS Alpha 10 GTR R35 9 sec | AsmMugen | Southern California Region | 0 | 11-10-2010 07:35 PM |