Mitsubishi motors a dying brand in US?

luigi90210

i honestly feel honda will die soon, sure their cars are popular(kind of) but they havent changed since the 90's, they are still loud, they sound like **** even stock, there is a lot of road noise and their cars are very basic in terms of features
their biggest competitor toyota at least changed their sedans to being quite, nicer looking then their 90's counter part, and they come loaded with features plus with their hybrid marketing campaign, everyone and their grandma has wanted a hybrid car, even though a 2.5 altima cvt will get better gas milage then a camry hybrid

DR_

You don't have a clue. Honda builds great appliances, which is what 99% of buyers want. They have however lost the enthusiasts to other brands because their lack of fun cars.

FairladyZ

Honda also has powers ports

Motorcycle, watersports stuff. They are far from dead and won't die lol

luigi90210

cool story bro

got another one to tell?

i guess that is what i meant, honda doesnt make anything that wows enthusiast anymore, the S2K was alright but it didnt have any power until 4k rpm, there will always be rice rocket civics though, and i dont think that will change
honestly i dont see a reason to buy a honda, when i was looking for a DD, i did give honda a try, but the 2012 civic sucks(noisy especially after vtec, lacking in power, and uncomfortable) and the 2012 accord wasnt any better

ON TOPIC:
Mitsubishi stopped producing the evo, i have a feeling they will go under for sure in the next few years unless they make some GSX eclipse again and price it in a good range

FairladyZ

Then again this why they will survive. The market for enthusiasts and sports cars isn't big. Why do you think Toyota abandoned making anything up until the frs as of late. Honda also went away cause the market isn't there. People in this time is looking for mpg and reliability. And Honda has that.

Things may change with the frs / brz since those are hot sellers, maybe Honda can race out the Crz or Nissan can revive the Silvia

1st

This is a garbage reply this belongs in a Mitsubishi lot.

cossie1600

What, 27/38 mpg beats 43/39 mpg?

luigi90210

i dont know about you, but my 3.5 altima 5AT averages 25mpg mostly city, and my friend with the 2.5 altima averages 38mpg, i stopped paper comparing mpg cause most of those tests are rigged to get the best scores(just look at the hyundai mess), like i can go almost 400 miles to a tank on my Z(depends on how hard i step on it but i usually get anywhere between 20-22 mpg)
heck even on my old gst eclipse i could get 27mpg if i stayed out of boost and that was rated for 15/18 iirc

sure, it looks nice buying a car that has a piece of paper that says 50mpg, but in all reality it comes down to real world data
its kind of like paper racing, you can buy a hyundai genesis 3.8 r-spec and have a car with 348hp 290tq and have one of the worst performing cars out there, or you can buy a Z, G, E46M3, ect. and get a better performing car with less HP on paper

FairladyZ

The thing is with Toyota you don't have to try to achieve those mpg.

You don't gotta drive like a bitch to save gas. You just drive normal and the Prius will yield good numbers.

How do I know? My two friends has a 2010 and 2012, there is no paper dreaming mpg, these cars actually achieve those ratings.

Ask yourself why you can't drive down the streets without seeing 10'of them? It's because toyota really do have the mpg tech on lock. Don't tell me people buy them for looks, cause that **** is ugly.