Nissan 370Z Forum  

The horsepower race has gone nuclear: 2013 GT500

Originally Posted by nuTinmuch I'm probably the looniest of the lefties on the forum and I've never heard anyone talking about banning high performance cars. Usually the discussion revolves around

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > The Lounge (Off Topic) > Other Vehicles


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2012, 11:50 AM   #661 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
shadoquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3886
shadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuTinmuch View Post
I'm probably the looniest of the lefties on the forum and I've never heard anyone talking about banning high performance cars. Usually the discussion revolves around SUVs, family sedans, and the like. Those are the bulk of the market -- not sports cars.

Regardless, the strategy most automakers have used in increasing efficiency has also increased performance. More efficient fuel systems, lighter cars/materials, forced induction over displacement, etc.
They needed increases in power and efficiency, because the safety hawks have increased vehicle weight by so much.
shadoquad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 12:03 PM   #662 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
nuTinmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,092
Drives: PG 7AT 370Z
Rep Power: 17
nuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to nuTinmuch
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
They needed increases in power and efficiency, because the safety hawks have increased vehicle weight by so much.
It's possible to have everything with smart engineering.

The BRZ, for example. Or -- in another category all together -- the Hyundai Sonata. It's lighter than our car, yet it's a feature-loaded comfortable family sedan.

Honestly, we just had to put up with a lot of bad design in the 90s and early 2000s. That led to more weight than anything else.
__________________
nuTinmuch! -- Platinum Graphite 370Z -- Check out my Gallery thread here!
nuTinmuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 12:15 PM   #663 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
shadoquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3886
shadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuTinmuch View Post
It's possible to have everything with smart engineering.

The BRZ, for example. Or -- in another category all together -- the Hyundai Sonata. It's lighter than our car, yet it's a feature-loaded comfortable family sedan.

Honestly, we just had to put up with a lot of bad design in the 90s and early 2000s. That led to more weight than anything else.
"Safety measures" didn't make cars lighter. It made them bulkier, less maneuverable, harder to stop. So then braking and handling had to be upgraded to keep up. Engines needed more power to be considered "fast". Then someone noticed that heavier cars with more powerful engines were brutally inefficient, and so FI became the winning move. Even archaic BMW moved into FI performance models.
shadoquad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 01:56 PM   #664 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
nuTinmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,092
Drives: PG 7AT 370Z
Rep Power: 17
nuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to nuTinmuch
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
"Safety measures" didn't make cars lighter. It made them bulkier, less maneuverable, harder to stop. So then braking and handling had to be upgraded to keep up. Engines needed more power to be considered "fast". Then someone noticed that heavier cars with more powerful engines were brutally inefficient, and so FI became the winning move. Even archaic BMW moved into FI performance models.
I never said they did, but they were hardly the only thing inflating the weight of cars.

In fact, I'd wager they weren't even the largest factor, especially when you consider the shift in building materials used and the birth of the crumple zone.

A BMW isn't heavy because it is safe, for example, it is heavy because it is designed to be comfortable and quiet. Those design choices have way more of an implication on vehicle weight than the inclusion of something like traction control, ABS, or structure rigidity.

But that is irrelevant. My point is that it is possible to have a safe, relatively efficient, fun car. None of these things have to mean major sacrifices -- they just often do because they are the road of least resistance. But in the modern era, people are pretty demanding, and that isn't good enough anymore. We want it all, and considering the cars released in the last year or two (and a few of them in the pipeline), we're going to get 'em.
__________________
nuTinmuch! -- Platinum Graphite 370Z -- Check out my Gallery thread here!

Last edited by nuTinmuch; 06-06-2012 at 02:00 PM.
nuTinmuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 02:03 PM   #665 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
shadoquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3886
shadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuTinmuch View Post
I never said they did, but they were hardly the only thing inflating the weight of cars.

In fact, I'd wager they weren't even the largest factor, especially when you consider the shift in building materials used and the birth of the crumple zone.

A BMW isn't heavy because it is safe, for example, it is heavy because it is designed to be comfortable and quiet. Those design choices have way more of an implication on vehicle weight than the inclusion of something like traction control, ABS, or structure rigidity.

But that is irrelevant. My point is that it is possible to have a safe, relatively efficient, fun car. None of these things have to mean major sacrifices -- they just often do because they are the road of least resistance. But in the modern era, people are pretty demanding, and that isn't good enough anymore. We want it all, and considering the cars released in the last year or two (and a few of them in the pipeline), we're going to get 'em.
We could argue about this all day, and I'd lump crumple zones in with safety measures. That's why they exist. BMW's were comfortable and quiet in the early 90's. They were also lighter.

But we're veering way off topic here. Suffice to say, the NHTSA is not my best friend.
shadoquad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 02:05 PM   #666 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
nuTinmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,092
Drives: PG 7AT 370Z
Rep Power: 17
nuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to nuTinmuch
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
We could argue about this all day, and I'd lump crumple zones in with safety measures. That's why they exist. BMW's were comfortable and quiet in the early 90's. They were also lighter.

But we're veering way off topic here. Suffice to say, the NHTSA is not my best friend.
They aren't perfect, but after being in a bad accident in a modern car, I'm a lot softer when it comes to safety stuff.

Anyway, back on topic.

Chevy Camaro ZL1 lines up against Ford Shelby GT500 on the dyno
__________________
nuTinmuch! -- Platinum Graphite 370Z -- Check out my Gallery thread here!
nuTinmuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 11:14 PM   #667 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Lemers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 15,371
Drives: 2012 Traverse LTZ
Rep Power: 52
Lemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond reputeLemers has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I just love this video. My favorite line in at 1:31.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eepl...e_gdata_player
__________________

2010 Black Cherry Touring/Sport/Nav Now - 2012 Travese LTZ until I leave for Turkey

Last edited by Lemers; 06-06-2012 at 11:18 PM.
Lemers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 11:29 PM   #668 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ImportConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7627
ImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
"Safety measures" didn't make cars lighter. It made them bulkier, less maneuverable, harder to stop. So then braking and handling had to be upgraded to keep up. Engines needed more power to be considered "fast". Then someone noticed that heavier cars with more powerful engines were brutally inefficient, and so FI became the winning move. Even archaic BMW moved into FI performance models.
How do you explain that the 370Z = lighter than 350Z, in lieu of your above statements?

FI is because of the EPA, and has nothing to do with weight. It's a fuel-cheap way to make more power on demand, and would happen regardless of weight fluctuation of the vehicle. It's just an evolution like fuel injection, which is slowly giving way to DI. It's just a "better" way. It can now be integrated with minimal/no lag, and that was what BMW was "waiting" for.

Turbos only make sense. Keep the engine in vacuum and you get great economy and the EPA is happy. Floor it and the car GOES, and the enthusiast is happy.

What's not to like?

Has nothing to do with weight.

Now yes, safety structures DO have weight, but they are more than offset by smarter engineering and advanced materials--harken back to the 350 vs. 370 curb weights even though the 370Z is a LOT more rigid.
ImportConvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 11:32 PM   #669 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ImportConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7627
ImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuTinmuch View Post
They aren't perfect, but after being in a bad accident in a modern car, I'm a lot softer when it comes to safety stuff.

Anyway, back on topic.

Chevy Camaro ZL1 lines up against Ford Shelby GT500 on the dyno
Looks like I am going to admit to being totally wrong. Ford's power + launch control = big victory at the drag-strip.

I am still not sure what to think about the track, though. The MRC suspension kicks the crap out of Fords dinosaur. But the power difference....I bet on long tracks the GT500 eats it up in the straights but on shorter tracks--especially one's with elevation changes and chicanes--the ZL1 makes the Shelby look clumsy.
ImportConvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:17 AM   #670 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 19
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImportConvert View Post
How do you explain that the 370Z = lighter than 350Z, in lieu of your above statements?

.
the 370 originally dropped about 200 lbs from the 350 via aluminum parts, shortened chassis, etc. They said 100 lbs got added back due to new safety requirments so it's a bit of both.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs
Lug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:14 AM   #671 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
shadoquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3886
shadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImportConvert View Post
How do you explain that the 370Z = lighter than 350Z, in lieu of your above statements?

FI is because of the EPA, and has nothing to do with weight. It's a fuel-cheap way to make more power on demand, and would happen regardless of weight fluctuation of the vehicle. It's just an evolution like fuel injection, which is slowly giving way to DI. It's just a "better" way. It can now be integrated with minimal/no lag, and that was what BMW was "waiting" for.

Turbos only make sense. Keep the engine in vacuum and you get great economy and the EPA is happy. Floor it and the car GOES, and the enthusiast is happy.

What's not to like?

Has nothing to do with weight.

Now yes, safety structures DO have weight, but they are more than offset by smarter engineering and advanced materials--harken back to the 350 vs. 370 curb weights even though the 370Z is a LOT more rigid.
The 370z was the lone sports car which did that, and it was one of the reasons I bought it.

And yes, moar weight = less efficient. Safety measures add weight = car less efficient = fix with FI. Yes, the EPA required higher average mileage across manufacturers' model lines (hello, Aston Cygnet). But the cars would be more efficient if they weren't so heavy.

Last edited by shadoquad; 06-07-2012 at 01:19 AM.
shadoquad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 02:58 AM   #672 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ImportConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7627
ImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lug View Post
the 370 originally dropped about 200 lbs from the 350 via aluminum parts, shortened chassis, etc. They said 100 lbs got added back due to new safety requirments so it's a bit of both.
Is that what they said? I could not find that. I found only that larger brakes, and more bracing added the weight back. You can call that safety equipment if you choose, as it's just semantics, but to me, anything that substantially increases torsional and bending rigidity functions first as a performance modification and second as a safety function, simply because a car that is TOO stiff will be more dangerous. The C6 Corvette actually had to be given some failure zones because it was initially too stuff and the force of some collisions transferred without much damping to the occupant. SO to me, that extra weight is pure performance, in the 370Z, regarding the bracing. Of course you can argue extra air-bags weight a bit, but not 120#.
ImportConvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 03:10 AM   #673 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ImportConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7627
ImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
The 370z was the lone sports car which did that, and it was one of the reasons I bought it.

And yes, moar weight = less efficient. Safety measures add weight = car less efficient = fix with FI. Yes, the EPA required higher average mileage across manufacturers' model lines (hello, Aston Cygnet). But the cars would be more efficient if they weren't so heavy.
The GT500 continues to do it.
The Corvette seems to be nearly identical (a C5 with some options is heavier than a C6 with some options, and vis-versa).
The Camaro certainly porked up. My 370Z is only slightly slower than the beast from a highway roll...or so I hear. For a 430hp car to barely out-gun a 332bhp car with a catback and drop-in tubes/filters is pretty lame.

I think everyone wants a lighter car. It helps mileage. It helps performance. Etc. etc.

Ford is going to shave the mustang down, and GM is going to trim the camaro down, I think. THey would be stupid not to.

The only people still going heavy is Chrysler, and I think that's only because they can't let go of the 300M chassis that they keep basing all their muscle cars off of. But hey, they do look good, even in 5/4 scale.

As a whole though, 2005-2015 is no-man's land. Cars are way better than the 90s and early 2000's, but REAL innovation and ground-breaking stuff is on the horizon for 2015 YM's, and in the future.

That is part of why I traded NOW for a 370Z. I want + equity in it by the time something actually game-changing hits the ground in the mid 20-teens.

Eyes on the mustang and new Z platform for me, although with Nissan's sales this last YM...I dunno. Their re-fresh was pretty...

"ummm...lets do...something? Yeah, okay, that might do it. Lets use old parts for the front end and adapt them with LED's and make the spokes on the wheels a bit wavy. Can we change out shocks and struts and paint the calipers? Give them a reflector out back? No net cost, you say? Sure. That should shut them up until we can offload this platform"

Back to the debate at hand, I think that FI is a solution to EPA/gov regulations, not the extra or non-existent net-weight gain of safety equipment. However, on a car like the 370Z, it is already efficient enough not to get hit with a gas-guzzler tax like the old GT500 did, and Nissan doesn't make enough of them to even touch fleet-averages. There, FI would only mean happier customers = more sales = will it offset cost of plumbing and cooling?

Last edited by ImportConvert; 06-07-2012 at 03:13 AM.
ImportConvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 06:49 AM   #674 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
m4a1mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 55,385
Drives: on two wheels
Rep Power: 6962
m4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond reputem4a1mustang has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I remember reading somewhere that Chrysler was looking to introduce a lighter platform for the Challenger.
__________________
- Steve
MAZOC Meet Thread
Zs & Coffee - Saturdays at 10AM in Fairfax, VA and Columbia, MD (Click the banner!)
LIKE us on Facebook!
m4a1mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 08:42 AM   #675 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
b1adesofcha0s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 40,963
Drives: HypeTrain Choo Choo!
Rep Power: 141
b1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond reputeb1adesofcha0s has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang View Post
I remember reading somewhere that Chrysler was looking to introduce a lighter platform for the Challenger.
Yeah I thought they were going to replace it with a smaller car and name it the Barracuda or something.
b1adesofcha0s is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
800 hp gt500 Cell Other Vehicles 10 04-11-2011 12:35 AM
GT500 vs 370Z spearfish25 Nissan 370Z General Discussions 186 10-04-2010 03:33 PM
2008 shelby gt500 nismo42 Other Vehicle For sale 9 07-18-2010 02:53 AM
370z vs gt500 Zrod Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip 10 04-11-2010 07:39 PM
2010 Mustang GT500 xDIEGOx Other Vehicles 10 01-02-2009 05:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2