![]() |
I dont think the Z falls short on "Bang for Buck" It does everything the 5.0 does as good or better except speed, and even there the Z is not far off stock for stock. They both cost around the same.
|
Quote:
for comparable cars though, the mustang is definitely cheaper. A 400A brembo mustang is comparable to a Touring+Sport Z at the closest, and goes for about $32k even if you don't negotiate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What about $50s?
|
Quote:
|
As to which is more bang per buck, it could go either way. With the Stang you get much more oomph for your money, by far. I mean youre getting a 412hp V8 for crying out loud. With the Z I feel your getting quality, something very capable in the twisties( not that your Stangs arent) and a little bit of exclusivity. For the straight up performance minded guy the Stang may actually have the edge. Then again I have a hard time comparing a V8 car to a V6 I mean it better damn well be faster!! If you put the Z up against other V6's it pwns. I dont mind being a tick behind a Stang on the straights, if it even happens:stirthepot: But yeah I do think the Mustang is an incredible deal, without a doubt.
|
I hate that word. Exclusivity. It is used too loosely here. The Z is NOT exclusive! There is NOTHING exclusive about it!
It is, however, a little rare. ;) |
Exclusive implies there are barriers to entry. Yes, I know the word is just being misused. No one actually thinks the Z is "exclusive" in its definition, they are just using that word in place of "rare."
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You missed the "exclusive" crew :rofl2:
|
Quote:
Once a 370Z owner always a 370Z owner! :bowrofl: |
I own a 370z in gt5:ugh2:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2