Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Other Vehicles (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/)
-   -   the least expansive super car? (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/33403-least-expansive-super-car.html)

Red__Zed 03-21-2011 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1000858)
or perhapse all-encompassing in its performance attributes. My car feels "expansive" both when I drive it, and when I try to safely fit that thing in storage, lol

That's very neat. Thanks so much for sharing.

bigpapapump 03-21-2011 09:13 PM

best lb for lb fighter - anderson silva
best lb for lb supercar - corvette z06 (yellow to be exact)

m4a1mustang 03-21-2011 09:23 PM

best lb for lb desert... pound cake!

ImportConvert 03-21-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1000863)
That's very neat. Thanks so much for sharing.

My pleasure. You figure out how my friends got over 700whp out of a stock S2K engine yet? Curious if you ever followed up with that/how they managed it? I stopped hanging out with that little click a few years ago, but was curious as to how that thing lived with that much boost and compression.

Red__Zed 03-22-2011 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1000992)
My pleasure. You figure out how my friends got over 700whp out of a stock S2K engine yet? Curious if you ever followed up with that/how they managed it? I stopped hanging out with that little click a few years ago, but was curious as to how that thing lived with that much boost and compression.

I've still not heard of anyone doing that for long on a stock engine. I know a few guys who got 700 ish with a thicker headgasket, but it usually didn't last long.

ImportConvert 03-22-2011 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1001200)
I've still not heard of anyone doing that for long on a stock engine. I know a few guys who got 700 ish with a thicker headgasket, but it usually didn't last long.

S2KfromHell lasted until it was wrecked, as I understand it. They got the S2K after I said the hell with the street scene here, so my info on it comes second and third hand, except for the engine dyno and I looked into that. Internally, it was stock, but that group was famous for "stock" stuff.

For example, they had a girl with a 99-04 year V6 mustang and Nitrous and a cam running low 12's@113.

Then we found out it had a custom manifold.
Then we found out it was a 4.0 truck engine.
Then we found out...

oleg 03-22-2011 12:39 AM

Found this discussed on the ffr forum. They bring up some valid points about the crash thing and they also compare it to a c6 allot. Either way i think it would be somewhat safe on the streets although from what i read some improvements to the frame wouldn't hurt.
GTM Crash: Engine restraint & eng. driver clearance - FFCars.com - Factory Five Racing Discussion Forum

ImportConvert 03-22-2011 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oleg (Post 1001276)
Found this discussed on the ffr forum. They bring up some valid points about the crash thing and they also compare it to a c6 allot. Either way i think it would be somewhat safe on the streets although from what i read some improvements to the frame wouldn't hurt.
GTM Crash: Engine restraint & eng. driver clearance - FFCars.com - Factory Five Racing Discussion Forum

What was mentioned is part of what bothers me. Crash testing is not required for this vehicle, nor was it done. It was thought out, designed on the computer, and sold to "you". Of course you will find more 'vettes that got jacked up, but here is a picture of my former roommates C5. It left the road after hitting a concrete barrier at 55mph and flipped 3 times going down an embankment.

He and his passenger suffered a few cuts and he probably had a code-brown. Both are just fine, and he has a few very minor scars from it. No broken bones or "serious" injuries. Lots of blood from what i heard as his scalp got nicked from the lexan roof that shattered (why I hate those removable roofs and refuse to own a 'vette with one). Head wounds bleed a lot. Anyway, RIP C5, glad he and his were in a safe car that had been properly tested.

http://i52.tinypic.com/mhfsm0.jpg

Red__Zed 03-22-2011 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1001265)
S2KfromHell lasted until it was wrecked, as I understand it. They got the S2K after I said the hell with the street scene here, so my info on it comes second and third hand, except for the engine dyno and I looked into that. Internally, it was stock, but that group was famous for "stock" stuff.

For example, they had a girl with a 99-04 year V6 mustang and Nitrous and a cam running low 12's@113.

Then we found out it had a custom manifold.
Then we found out it was a 4.0 truck engine.
Then we found out...

I think they were running a 3 mil HG, but I'm not sure on that. The numbers also came on a pretty optimistic dyno, as the quarter mile trap times indicate.

Like most things, the motor will last putting down 650 or so whp stock, but it's just a waiting game. It might last 30-40 runs, it might last one. You just don't know.

cfweber 03-22-2011 05:11 PM

by power to weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by oleg (Post 998073)
So i found this car the GTM by factory five on the internet recently and it sounds like an amazing deal. You can have everything done for around 35k-45k. For the price the performance specs are amazing IMO. I also think its not exactly the best looking car but defiantly something i wouldn't mind having.

GTM Supercar

SUPERCARS.NET - Comprehensive Specifications, Galleries & Forums since 1996

ImportConvert 03-22-2011 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1002094)
I think they were running a 3 mil HG, but I'm not sure on that. The numbers also came on a pretty optimistic dyno, as the quarter mile trap times indicate.

Like most things, the motor will last putting down 650 or so whp stock, but it's just a waiting game. It might last 30-40 runs, it might last one. You just don't know.

Sounds about right. Belonged to the crew known for blowing up cars just to beat someone, or, as I recall one night, just because they were curious what would blow up first if they threw boost at a car without a tune, lol

Red__Zed 03-22-2011 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1003485)
Sounds about right. Belonged to the crew known for blowing up cars just to beat someone, or, as I recall one night, just because they were curious what would blow up first if they threw boost at a car without a tune, lol

I mean, if you've got the money and the time...go for it. I suppose there are worse ways to waste them.

ImportConvert 03-22-2011 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1003490)
I mean, if you've got the money and the time...go for it. I suppose there are worse ways to waste them.

More time than money from what I know. Unless their fortunes changed with the Hanesville shale deal or something. Most have shops and just like to tinker.

Red__Zed 03-22-2011 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1003502)
More time than money from what I know. Unless their fortunes changed with the Hanesville shale deal or something. Most have shops and just like to tinker.

The s2k from hell rebuild looked pretty expensive from what I saw. Hard to say though. You can spend a lot more or less than another guy just by having the right or wrong hookups.

ImportConvert 03-22-2011 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1003518)
The s2k from hell rebuild looked pretty expensive from what I saw. Hard to say though. You can spend a lot more or less than another guy just by having the right or wrong hookups.

Don't have a clue how that was financed. That one was "done right", from what I know. I do know connections probably paid a big role in things. I stopped hanging out with the group a few years back because all it was was high school type drama and a lot of yelling about who's whatever was faster than whoever elses whatever. A lot of people without the money getting in WAY over their heads on cars that they blew up trying to prove the point, and a whole lot of other mess. I wanted no part of it.

my2004Z 02-27-2013 01:38 PM

I think everyone is missing the key difference between the extruded aluminum type chassis vs. the steel tube versions used in a lot of race cars. Energy absorption. Your moms Corolla is loaded with crumple zones which take up precious volume and add weight to the car all to keep her brain from bouncing all over the place in her skull and organs from detaching themselves upon impact. All the gear connected to the pilots in serious race cars are meant to make up for the lack of crumple zones while keeping the weight down.

I have had my eye on the GTM Supercar and feel that it's almost to the point where I would buy one. They have enough years under their belts and enough track time for me to call them solid. I wouldn't mind using it as a daily driver either.

b1adesofcha0s 02-27-2013 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigpapapump (Post 1000889)
best lb for lb fighter - anderson silva

Fvck yes! /thread

Isamu 02-27-2013 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by b1adesofcha0s (Post 2187355)
Fvck yes! /thread

:roflpuke2::roflpuke2::roflpuke2:

UNKNOWN_370 02-27-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by my2004Z (Post 2187280)
I think everyone is missing the key difference between the extruded aluminum type chassis vs. the steel tube versions used in a lot of race cars. Energy absorption. Your moms Corolla is loaded with crumple zones which take up precious volume and add weight to the car all to keep her brain from bouncing all over the place in her skull and organs from detaching themselves upon impact. All the gear connected to the pilots in serious race cars are meant to make up for the lack of crumple zones while keeping the weight down.

I have had my eye on the GTM Supercar and feel that it's almost to the point where I would buy one. They have enough years under their belts and enough track time for me to call them solid. I wouldn't mind using it as a daily driver either.

Yeah, this thread was right in both sides of the argument. And you clarified it by showing arguing wasn't necessary based on application specific usefulness.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2