GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner Resigns at request of White House

BanningZ · 03-30-2009, 03:08 AM

I was waiting for this to happen. Too bad he didn't do it on his own years ago.

Quote:

GM Boss Resigns At White House's Request

By TOM KRISHER and KEN THOMAS

Rick Wagoner will step down immediately as chairman and chief executive of the struggling Detroit automaker.

General Motors Corp. Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner will step down immediately at the request of the White House, administration officials said Sunday.

The news comes as President Obama prepares to unveil additional restructuring efforts designed to save the domestic auto industry.

The officials asked not to be identified because details of the restructuring plan have not yet been made public. On Monday, Obama is to announce measures to restructure GM and Chrysler LLC in exchange for additional government loans. The companies have been living on $17.4 billion in government aid and have requested $21.6 billion more.

Wagoner's departure indicates that more management changes may be part of the deal, but it is still unclear who will be put in charge of GM. The automaker recently promoted Fritz Henderson, its former chief financial officer, to become president and chief operating officer. Many in the company thought he would eventually succeed Wagoner.

Detroit-based GM issued a statement Sunday saying only that the company expects a decision by the administration soon but that "it would not be appropriate for us to speculate on the content of any announcement."

A person familiar with Chrysler's management said the company has been given no indication that the government will require any changes at the Auburn Hills, Mich., company, which has been led by former Home Depot chief Robert Nardelli since August 2007. The person also spoke on condition of anonymity because Obama's plan has not been made public.

Wagoner, 56, has repeatedly said he felt it was better for the company if he led it through the crisis, but he has faced sharp criticism on Capitol Hill for what many lawmakers regard as years of missteps, mistakes and arrogance by the Big Three automakers.

Wagoner joined GM in 1977, serving in several capacities in the U.S., Brazil and Europe. He became president and chief executive in 2000 and has served as chairman and CEO since May 2003.

Obama said Sunday that GM and Chrysler and all those with a stake in their survival need to take more hard steps to help the struggling automakers restructure for the future. In an interview with CBS' "Face the Nation" broadcast Sunday, Obama said the companies must do more to receive additional financial aid from the government.

"They're not there yet," he said.

A person familiar with Obama's plans said last week they would go deeper than what the Bush administration demanded when it approved the initial loans last year.

Wagoner, in an interview with The Associated Press in December, had declined to speculate on suggestions from some members of Congress that GM's leadership team should step down as part of any rescue package.

"I'm doing what I do because it adds a lot of value to the company," Wagoner said in a Dec. 4 interview as GM sought federal aid from the Bush administration. "It's not clear to me that experience in this industry should be viewed as a negative but I'm going to do what's right for the company and I'll do it in consultation with the (GM) board (of directors)."

Wagoner has been credited by auto industry analysts with doing more to restructure the giant bureaucratic automaker than any other executive. But given that he has been at GM's helm for so long, many of his critics say he moved far too slowly to take on the United Auto Workers and shrink the company as its market share tumbled.

While GM has improved its cars in the last two years, critics say the company relied for too long on sales of pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles for its profits and was unprepared for a drastic market shift when gasoline prices hit $4 per gallon last year.

During the Congressional debate over whether to give GM and Chrysler loans last year, many lawmakers criticized Wagoner, including Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Banking Committee.

He accused automakers' top management of having a "head-in-the-sand" approach to problems and said Wagoner "has to move on" as part of a government-run restructuring that should be a condition of financial life support for the auto industry.

David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich., said Sunday that Wagoner's departure gives the government a rationale to provide additional aid to the automaker. He was not surprised by the move, but said he is disappointed because he considers Wagoner a capable leader.

"I think that as a condition for further government support, this helps give them a little cover with the public," Cole said. "Essentially he's taking one for the team."

Cole noted that other automakers have been shaking up management as well. He pointed to Toyota Motor Corp., whose president, Katsuaki Watanabe, recently said he would be stepping down as the Japanese automaker weathers financial difficulty. Also, France's biggest carmaker, PSA Peugeot-Citroen, abruptly ousted CEO Christian Streiff on Sunday, saying "exceptional difficulties" confronting the auto industry require new management at the top.

Cole said Nardelli's departure is less likely than Wagoner's because Nardelli is "relatively new" to the automaker, with less than two years at the helm.

Many GM executives likely will be disappointed at Wagoner's departure, Cole said.

"They had great affection for Rick — someone that's fair, that acts like a coach, that holds people's feet to the fire but has a good understanding of human behavior," Cole said.

GM and Chrysler were required by the Bush administration to get major concessions from debtholders and the United Auto Workers, with a deadline of March 31 for signed contracts. But very little headway was being made with either party this weekend as they awaited Obama's announcement.
Related Stories

Members of Obama's auto task force have said bankruptcy could still be an option for GM and Chrysler if their management, workers, creditors and shareholders failed to make sacrifices. Both companies are trying to reduce their debt by two-thirds and convince the United Auto Workers union to accept shares of stock in exchange for half of the payments into a union-run trust fund for retiree health care costs. The deals also call for executive pay cuts and labor costs that are competitive with Japanese automakers with U.S. operations.

Bondholders have been reluctant to accept the cuts, saying they're being required to sacrifice more than others, but they have been reviewing a recent offer by GM. The union has agreed to other terms of the loans, including work rule changes and reducing total hourly labor costs at U.S factories to a level comparable with Japanese automakers.

Copyright Associated Press / NBC Washington

GM Boss Resigns At White House's Request | NBC Washington

frost · 03-30-2009, 09:14 PM

Scary thought that the white house has the freedom to fire people in the private sector. One step closer to socialism

BMW Killa · 03-30-2009, 09:23 PM

way too much interference. wagnor actually didnt do a bad job, just the unions locking him up at every turn.

BanningZ · 03-30-2009, 09:28 PM

^Really you think so? Everything I've read up on him states that he just made a lot of really poor decisions. I think the unions get blamed for a lot more than they deserve, but don't get me wrong I'm not exactly a fan of unions.

frost · 03-30-2009, 09:38 PM

I agree with the above. He's only been chairman since like, 2003, which to me means he inherited a lot of problems.

BanningZ · 03-30-2009, 09:40 PM

^good point, but then again its amazing when you think about a presidential term being 4 years and what they can do. CEO's have even less restrictions.

frost · 03-30-2009, 09:51 PM

And oh, by the way, this wasn't even run by congress. Obama just did it. If that really fair?
Is it really where we want the country to go?

BanningZ · 03-30-2009, 09:58 PM

No but at the same time GM has done a piss poor job of running itself and THEY asked for the partial government investment. It may not be the right thing but GM chose this over chapter 11 which also would have kept them alive.

frost · 03-30-2009, 10:04 PM

Wouldnt argue with that. Can't see why they fought so hard to avoid bankruptcy.

frost · 03-30-2009, 10:07 PM

Although the market did drop 250 points on obama doing that. Maybe he should have left well enough alone. After all, GM did decline getting more money, stating they were doing ok.

dad · 03-30-2009, 10:13 PM

Obama has done his homework in making this decision.

frost · 03-30-2009, 10:16 PM

I'm sure he has. Not saying he didn't, in fact, I'm not even saying it's a bad decision to replace wagoner per se. I'm just saying I dont feel ultra comfy with a prez who just axes CEOs without running it by anyone. If bush did this, people would be flipping out at the audacity.

dad · 03-30-2009, 10:24 PM

It is a scary thought. What pissed me off was, he(wagnor) took the bailout money and then started layoffs at GM.

03-30-2009, 09:28 PM	#4 (permalink)
BanningZ A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: nowhere Posts: 5,478 Drives: 06' Nismo Frontier Rep Power: 29	^Really you think so? Everything I've read up on him states that he just made a lot of really poor decisions. I think the unions get blamed for a lot more than they deserve, but don't get me wrong I'm not exactly a fan of unions. __________________ Become a Premium Member: Click HERE MB 06' Nismo VQ40DE

03-30-2009, 09:40 PM	#6 (permalink)
BanningZ A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: nowhere Posts: 5,478 Drives: 06' Nismo Frontier Rep Power: 29	^good point, but then again its amazing when you think about a presidential term being 4 years and what they can do. CEO's have even less restrictions. __________________ Become a Premium Member: Click HERE MB 06' Nismo VQ40DE

03-30-2009, 09:58 PM	#8 (permalink)
BanningZ A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: nowhere Posts: 5,478 Drives: 06' Nismo Frontier Rep Power: 29	No but at the same time GM has done a piss poor job of running itself and THEY asked for the partial government investment. It may not be the right thing but GM chose this over chapter 11 which also would have kept them alive. __________________ Become a Premium Member: Click HERE MB 06' Nismo VQ40DE

03-30-2009, 10:13 PM	#11 (permalink)
dad Grand Prix of Endurance Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Tennessee Posts: 3,476 Drives: Mulsanne Straight Rep Power: 26	Obama has done his homework in making this decision. __________________ We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary.

03-30-2009, 10:24 PM	#13 (permalink)
dad Grand Prix of Endurance Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Tennessee Posts: 3,476 Drives: Mulsanne Straight Rep Power: 26	It is a scary thought. What pissed me off was, he(wagnor) took the bailout money and then started layoffs at GM. __________________ We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary.

03-30-2009, 09:14 PM	#2 (permalink)
frost Retired admin Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Winterfell Posts: 106,613 Drives: Your Wife Crazy Rep Power: 0	Scary thought that the white house has the freedom to fire people in the private sector. One step closer to socialism

03-30-2009, 09:23 PM	#3 (permalink)
BMW Killa Enthusiast Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: FL Posts: 287 Drives: neezmo Rep Power: 188	way too much interference. wagnor actually didnt do a bad job, just the unions locking him up at every turn.

03-30-2009, 09:38 PM	#5 (permalink)
frost Retired admin Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Winterfell Posts: 106,613 Drives: Your Wife Crazy Rep Power: 0	I agree with the above. He's only been chairman since like, 2003, which to me means he inherited a lot of problems.

03-30-2009, 09:51 PM	#7 (permalink)
frost Retired admin Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Winterfell Posts: 106,613 Drives: Your Wife Crazy Rep Power: 0	And oh, by the way, this wasn't even run by congress. Obama just did it. If that really fair? Is it really where we want the country to go?

03-30-2009, 10:04 PM	#9 (permalink)
frost Retired admin Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Winterfell Posts: 106,613 Drives: Your Wife Crazy Rep Power: 0	Wouldnt argue with that. Can't see why they fought so hard to avoid bankruptcy.

03-30-2009, 10:07 PM	#10 (permalink)
frost Retired admin Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Winterfell Posts: 106,613 Drives: Your Wife Crazy Rep Power: 0	Although the market did drop 250 points on obama doing that. Maybe he should have left well enough alone. After all, GM did decline getting more money, stating they were doing ok.

03-30-2009, 10:16 PM	#12 (permalink)
frost Retired admin Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Winterfell Posts: 106,613 Drives: Your Wife Crazy Rep Power: 0	I'm sure he has. Not saying he didn't, in fact, I'm not even saying it's a bad decision to replace wagoner per se. I'm just saying I dont feel ultra comfy with a prez who just axes CEOs without running it by anyone. If bush did this, people would be flipping out at the audacity.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Parts Request Thread	THMotorsports	THMotorsports	8	08-13-2009 02:29 PM
AZ in the house...	Slidefox	New Forum Member	12	07-21-2009 01:06 AM
AZ In the House! The Sequel!	Endgame	New Forum Member	11	07-20-2009 09:23 PM
IPP in the house!!!	Kyle(Houston)	Importpartspro	0	02-18-2009 06:55 PM
Man digs under house to remove home-made Lamborghini	AK370Z	The Lounge (Off Topic)	3	11-18-2008 12:45 AM