![]() |
Quote:
4.6L 3V Engine weight ???? - ModularFords.com 3.8 L vs 5.0 L engine weight??? Effect on suspension??? - Super Coupe Club of America Forums |
You just pretty much posted up your own fail right there lol...
The 5.0L weight thread was made...in 2004. For a 1991 5.0L. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Funny... http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/...27-post23.html Quote:
Both are 5.7L Chevy Small Blocks, with a mere 5 years separating them. |
The new 5.0 is an almost completely new design, using the old specs is pretty retarded. The engine is expected to drop weight as it will be an aluminum block.
|
:worship:i'm still faster:worship:
|
This thread went without a post for weeks and it has since exploded into a flame fest.
I do have to thank forum members like Bobo and m4a1 for their factual, and useful contributions to this thread. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well its about time they did something about that engine, I mean c'mon a 4.0 V6 making 122hp 30tq less than the 3.7 V6 Z? Nice that they decided to go with a 3.7 making 300hp....that and since it's only about 100lbs more than the Z all its missing is a IRS and the Z has a new friend to play with :D
|
exhaust note....:ugh2: or :tup: ....
hopefully w/ some aftermarket it could sound like this |
Its the V6, why would it sound good? heh
|
I'm sure it will sound pretty good with aftermarket exhaust. The V8 is the only one with a tuned exhaust note. The V6 is just hushed up because Ford knows 9 out of 10 enthusiast Mustang buyers go for the V8.
That said, the 3.8L V6's found in the 94-04 Mustangs sound like crap. A well-built and reliable engine it was, but holy crap it sounded terrible. I made the mistake of buying exhaust for my '02 V6 (I was 16) and it sounded like a busted up truck. LOL. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2