![]() |
Porsche 911 or Jaguar F-Type?
Whats the difference, spec for spec the bases seem pretty similar. The sport 911 vs the sport F are huge differences so lets leave it at bases for comparison. Which one is the better buy, and why?
|
F Type coupe or convertible? Personally on looks alone I would take the F Type coupe. Not to mention it is cheaper with similar HP, more torque, only at the cost of 500 lbs. Also for the price of the base 911, you can buy an F Type S which is a supercharged V6. I think either way my vote would go F Type but I am biased against the 911.
Also, however off topic it may be, before I spent $80k on a base 911 I would personally buy a Cayman GT4 for $85k |
WOW!! This is a toss up for me. I love both. I have yet to drive any but I can get a test drive if they run my credit. I think it would all come down to which one I can get the better deal for. Both are beast!
YzGyz |
A base 911 vs an F-Type? F-type, no hesitation. Now 911 Carrera S nicely equipped vs F-Type...911, all day.
|
911 if its a GTS or S.
|
The F-Type looks much better (resembles a Z), but it is a Jaguar which I associate with unreliability. It is claimed that they have improved, but I wouldn't risk it.
The 911...enough said. Porsche all day. I would go for the Cayman GT4 as well though. |
neither.
if you're spending that much cash go get a GT-R. 2015's are going for low 80's right now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jags and 911s are beautiful cars. The GTR looks like a car designed completely by engineers. It's a technological marvel, but it's 7 kinds of ******* ugly.
|
Quote:
beauty is subjective. engineering and technology is good if it works. performance and cost based the GT-R blows those two out of the water. :tiphat: |
If you spend that kind of money on a car, it should make you want to go out in the garage to just stare at it. The Jag has that, 911s have that. Hell, even a C7 or a Z has that. The GTR? At least you can't see the outside from the driver's seat. It's a shame, since all of the previous GTRs were gorgeous. This one is a solid "meh".
|
Drive: GT-R
Stare: F-Type Own: 911 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
911.....looks ok. looks about the same forever and its a wider/longer version of the cheaper models cayman and boxster. 182k base for a turbo S which honestly turbo verison is the only way I would ever even consider one. the gt3 rs is about the only semi-good looking one as well. you all are fuckin retarded sometimes. :shakes head: if a GT-R wasn't an option i'd take a Z06 C7 over either of the two aforementioned vehicles in a heartbeat. |
Agreed on the Z06. I'd take that over the GTR any day, especially since it's the only one you can get a proper transmission in anymore.
|
Quote:
You can get the Cayman GT4 in the proper transmission, I am not even sure that they offer an automatic. IMO the best all around choice for 85k unless you want a DD, but none of these are really DD cars. |
Quote:
I would rock a Cayman GT4 everyday, for the record. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On a side note, I can just imagine how frustrated I would be driving a super fast vehicle like the GT-R, 911 GTS (or turbo) or Corvette. It is frustrating enough having to deal with other cars on the road in the relatively slow Z. For me, I think I would go with a boosted Z over anything :driving: |
Quote:
BTW, I'd probably go for the Jag F-Type Roadster. |
This should help with some of the argument
What's Faster In A Straight Line: A Nissan GT-R Or An AWD Jaguar F-Type R? |
Quote:
so all your points about MT and RWD are void. now for dealing with fast cars when there's others on the road it's a simple solution......go around them. you have a functioning right foot I would assume so try and use it. boosted Z is a retarded alternative to those other choices. boosting an engine which is NA stock comes with headaches. ask anyone who's done it. it's rarely a smooth life afterwards. you give up a large percentage chance of having DD reliability which was the mentioned above I believe as a parameter. |
Quote:
GT-R wins price and performance. to be honest looks as well. the F type isn't that great. think a few of you have been drinking a little early today. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
if you're swinging that money get the Nismo GT-R and call it a day right lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
GTS with PDK bases at 80K that's before all of the high priced options. |
Quote:
As far as your "functioning right foot" comment...taking things personally? I have had two supercharged vehicles and they were suprisingly reliable. Not expecting that when boosting the Z, but I plan on getting another DD by then. But this isn't about me. |
Quote:
base f type is based at 65k. go get a vette. base 911 all 350hp is really worth 90k again don't waste your money. so base 911 is around 90k. 2015 gt-r are going in the 80's or similar. sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo it's actually quite comparable. as for the right foot not personal just an observation. what vehicles were supercharged? depending on what car and if oem or aftermarket make a difference. :facepalm: |
OP, are you looking at comparing these two for any specific reason? Are you set on buying one of these two. Honestly there are much better options unless you are stuck on those two. In that price range you can get an M3, M4, C63 AMG, Z06 Corvette, GT-R, and in all of those cases I would say you would end up with a better car than an F Type or a 911.
|
I don't think I've ever SEEN a base Porsche of any model post 2000. You'd probably have to special order it.
|
911 probably a better buy for resale value
|
Quote:
Are they uncommon around the US? |
There are about three of them I see driving around my kinda small town, so I don't think they are uncommon.
|
Quote:
There's too many around me. At cars and coffee there's about 6 and I've seen multiple others around. It's an epidemic lol |
Tons of them around here.
|
I chose the 911S
http://imageshack.com/a/img673/3206/8wpZbD.jpg |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2