[OFFICIAL] Discussion for the next new Nissan 400Z Z35?

6MT-Z34 · 03-24-2015, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TerribleONE

While I completely agree that 60k is a bit steep, some of the comparisons in here are hilarious.

I wanna come to your neck of the woods if you can buy a used Z34+mods and still have money for a down payment on a house, or find a used GT-R that hasn't been beat to sh!t for under 60k

ZKraken22 · 03-24-2015, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TerribleONE

While I completely agree that 60k is a bit steep, some of the comparisons in here are hilarious.

I wanna come to your neck of the woods if you can buy a used Z34+mods and still have money for a down payment on a house, or find a used GT-R that hasn't been beat to sh!t for under 60k

Not EVERY use GT-R is or will be beat to ****.

6MT-Z34 · 03-24-2015, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKraken22

Not EVERY use GT-R is or will be beat the ****.

most leases will though...

BC416 · 03-24-2015, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brancky3

I agree, but the post that I quoted said $60k for 400hp was not a lot - no other factors were mentioned.

All good. I cross-shopped both cars before I got the Z so I took it a little personal. A lot of posters on here think that car is the answer to everything.

That being said I think $60k defeats the purpose of an affordable sports car that the Z stands for. Maybe I could see it if they go with the rumoured 2 engine choices and you max out the more expensive one with all the bells and whistles. Still doesn't make much sense to me though.

brancky3 · 03-24-2015, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BC416

All good. I cross-shopped both cars before I got the Z so I took it a little personal. A lot of posters on here think that car is the answer to everything.

That being said I think $60k defeats the purpose of an affordable sports car that the Z stands for. Maybe I could see it if they go with the rumoured 2 engine choices and you max out the more expensive one with all the bells and whistles. Still doesn't make much sense to me though.

It's compared a lot because it's close competition, close in price and 100 more hp but in a Mustang

I would never spend $60k on a Z, no matter how many bells and whistles it has. I'd rather take a Cayman S ($64k) with zero options than a loaded Z at $60k.

BC416 · 03-24-2015, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brancky3

It's compared a lot because it's close competition, close in price and 100 more hp but in a Mustang

I would never spend $60k on a Z, no matter how many bells and whistles it has. I'd rather take a Cayman S ($64k) with zero options than a loaded Z at $60k.

The bolded part is why I chose the Z.

I'd never purchase a brand new vehicle anyway. Don't see the point in driving off the lot and losing a couple grand in a matter of minutes. Used all day.

MagmaRed370z · 03-24-2015, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kidkotic2001

Not a chance, might as well just save up a little more and get a Corvette, Porsche, or anything a top of the line Z28

That's true. Like a 2015 Cayman S starting at 64k.

shika805 · 03-24-2015, 02:10 PM

4 banger Z??? ridiculous... like i said before, retire the Z for 10 years and leave it a 6 cylinder which should be the only power plant. Revive the 240SX and make a hell of different versions, hybrid 4 banger, turbo and economy car. Reality is, people want a "Sporty Car" not a "Sports Car."

Nissan retired the Z after the 300ZX, why not now. Then come back with bang later on.

brancky3 · 03-24-2015, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shika805

4 banger Z??? ridiculous... like i said before, retire the Z for 10 years and leave it a 6 cylinder which should be the only power plant. Revive the 240SX and make a hell of different versions, hybrid 4 banger, turbo and economy car. Reality is, people want a "Sporty Car" not a "Sports Car."

Nissan retired the Z after the 300ZX, why not now. Then come back with bang later on.

I could see a 240SX with a turbo 4cyl being popular if priced below the FRS/BRZ.

MagmaRed370z · 03-24-2015, 02:17 PM

I think that Nissan doesn't want to make a super jump in HP as they do not want to be intrusive with GTR territory hurting GTR sales. At least give it more juice to be faster/cooler/better car than the current 5.0 Mustang.

TerribleONE · 03-24-2015, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKraken22

Not EVERY use GT-R is or will be beat to ****.

I agree, but for 55k id be willing to bet it is.

ZKraken22 · 03-24-2015, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TerribleONE

I agree, but for 55k id be willing to bet it is.

Or maybe because by 2017 it's a 8 year old car (depreciation). I'll take a 55k GT-R with miles below 35k. I don't baby my Z but i assure you its in great condition all around. let's not just throw blasphemy around and say "every" low priced GT-R has been treated with abuse. Plus extended warranties are offered even on used cars.

ZKraken22 · 03-24-2015, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brancky3

It's compared a lot because it's close competition, close in price and 100 more hp but in a Mustang

I would never spend $60k on a Z, no matter how many bells and whistles it has. I'd rather take a Cayman S ($64k) with zero options than a loaded Z at $60k.

If Nissan did what the Americans do (GT500,ZL1,Hellcat) id buy a 60K Z. Call it a Nismo RS with 600 HP, Warranty, yup sign me up.

3Aims · 03-24-2015, 03:12 PM

Geez. Paid $28k for a 2015 base and my reasoning was that it was an exceptional value and fun to drive. $60k? I'd get a vette for less.

RicerX · 03-24-2015, 03:14 PM

Oh gee... another dumb ******* report about the "next Z".

I'd repeat myself from the last three threads about this, but I'm busy.

03-24-2015, 02:10 PM	#53 (permalink)
shika805 Enthusiast Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Santa Barbara, CA Posts: 491 Drives: 40th Z, 71' 240z Rep Power: 20	4 banger Z??? ridiculous... like i said before, retire the Z for 10 years and leave it a 6 cylinder which should be the only power plant. Revive the 240SX and make a hell of different versions, hybrid 4 banger, turbo and economy car. Reality is, people want a "Sporty Car" not a "Sports Car." Nissan retired the Z after the 300ZX, why not now. Then come back with bang later on. __________________ 1971 Datsun 240z, 2010 40th Anniversary Z Build #541

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[MAZOC] Official "Off-Topic" Discussion Thread	m4a1mustang	MAZOC	6670	09-06-2018 07:21 PM
Official Insurance Premium Discussion Thread	nogoodname	Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions	421	04-06-2013 11:37 PM
Nissan 370Z Official Specs Released from Nissan 11.15.08	AK370Z	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	32	02-20-2012 01:14 AM
Nissan 370Z Official Specs Released from Nissan 11.15.08	AK370Z	Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery	24	09-21-2011 11:10 AM
Nissan USA releases Official Nissan 370Z pictures 10.29.08	AK370Z	Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery	15	11-10-2008 08:17 AM

03-24-2015, 02:17 PM	#55 (permalink)
MagmaRed370z A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: USA Posts: 1,468 Drives: 14' 370z Sport Magma Rep Power: 13	I think that Nissan doesn't want to make a super jump in HP as they do not want to be intrusive with GTR territory hurting GTR sales. At least give it more juice to be faster/cooler/better car than the current 5.0 Mustang.

03-24-2015, 03:12 PM	#59 (permalink)
3Aims Base Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Dallas Posts: 14 Drives: 2015 370Z Rep Power: 11	Geez. Paid $28k for a 2015 base and my reasoning was that it was an exceptional value and fun to drive. $60k? I'd get a vette for less.

03-24-2015, 03:14 PM	#60 (permalink)
RicerX Track Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: TN Posts: 597 Drives: To the Pizza joint. Rep Power: 7721	Oh gee... another dumb ******* report about the "next Z". I'd repeat myself from the last three threads about this, but I'm busy.