![]() |
Originally Posted by Chuck33079 It's the same gearbox as the one in the IS250. Not sure what other ones it's available in. Yes, Chuck is correct. One of the earlier
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,427
Drives: 17 6MT M2
Rep Power: 18755 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Yes, Chuck is correct. One of the earlier concepts of the 86 cars came with the Subaru engine and gearbox from the Impreza. However actual production ended up with the Subaru engine and gearbox from the IS250. Production for both cars are done at the Subaru plant in Gunma Japan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,427
Drives: 17 6MT M2
Rep Power: 18755 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Not sure all of your facts are correct or interpreted correctly Ricer but I'm not going to argue them as I hope you're right on this and I'm wrong.
I'm with you that sure Nissan will most likely use the Q50/60 platform but I'd like to see Nissan integrate some of the GTR technology as well. So we'll most likely get the 3 & 400 hp tt engines. But if Nissan used the low center of gravity weight model (like the GTR) and move the transmission to the rear, but keep it a rwd. This would definitely be a Z I'd be interested in and wouldn't mind paying more for it than the current Z. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Delaware
Posts: 715
Drives: 09 MB 370Z Touring
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I don't think the Z is big enough for a transmission in the rear. The GT-R and Aston Martins are both larger than the Z. Plus we have that massive fuel tank, which I honestly want to keep since we are one of the few cars capable of 500 miles between gas stops.
__________________
2009 370Z Touring with Sport |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 597
Drives: To the Pizza joint.
Rep Power: 7721 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
There's a video (or two) about the development of the Q50 Eau Rouge and how they got to where they got with the configuration of the prototype. When they got to the decision of using the GT-R engine, there were several reasons why they didn't go with its transmission. The first one? It didn't fit - the platform of the GT-R was designed around the chassis and powertrain. It was never intended to be a "volume" car per say, and they had the luxury of doing whatever they wanted with it.
So the transmission choice for the Eau Rouge concept? The M56 7AT (with a few tweaks). The Q50 Eau Rouge was created with a single mandate - raid the parts bin. There were to be no one-off parts. It is a GT-R motor with the AWD system and transmission from the M56S. This is why, as a concept it was completely driveable. This circles back to my belief in shoehorning the existing 6MT into the next gen Z. The gearing is fine, and if it needs some tweaking, they can pull a 2015 Nismo and modify the final drive on it and bill it as improved acceleration or, in the opposite direction, improved fuel economy. Also, if the M's 7AT can be mated to a VR38 without extensive rework, then the Z's 6MT can be mated to the new VR30. If the sales tank on the next gen Z, then you haven't built a new transmission that can't be used in any other model. You haven't designed a platform that won't be used elsewhere. You haven't built a motor that isn't being used elsewhere. It doesn't get less risky than that for an automaker, honestly. All the pieces are there. It's just a matter of putting them together. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Nissan has axed so many concepts I'm beginning to question if the GRIP Z chassis will be used but I'm hoping. But also... the G37 was about 3700lbs and the Z is about 3,300lbs. The Q60 coupe is supposed to be about 3,400 to 3,500lbs.
If Nissan still uses the modified FM platform for the next Z? That's 3,000-3,100lbs. If you average it against the logical the current Z and G platform. Increasing Q sales would mean the Z will see production as it shows interest in the platform.
__________________
Favorite Quote. "I'm not gonna kill you... I'm just gonna Bash Your Face In" Jack Nicholson-"The Shining". 1980 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,468
Drives: 14' 370z Sport Magma
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
Of course, more rumors but I hope that's not near the expected design (Picture).
2018 Nissan Z | car review @ Top Speed
__________________
Sold: 2014 Magnetic Black Base. Current: 2014 Magma Red 370z Sport | ARK Grip Exhaust | 25mm HR Spacers | GTR Button | DRL Mod |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 258
Drives: 2013 370Z
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Delaware
Posts: 715
Drives: 09 MB 370Z Touring
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I like where they said '2 seater convertible with 2.0L turbo hybrid motor'. They've been saying the same thing about the Honda S2000 coming back as such.
__________________
2009 370Z Touring with Sport |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Shawnee KS
Posts: 5,698
Drives: 15 Magma Red 6MT
Rep Power: 2684377 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I'm surprised someone hasn't said this is the new Z:
Nissan Concept 2020 Vision Gran Turismo | Nissan USA ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,045
Drives: 09 370Z Touring/Sprt
Rep Power: 10091 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
For all those hoping nissan would discontinue the Z :P
Nissan Has No Plans to Build a Smaller Miata Competitor But not all the news from Nakamura was disappointing. He also said the GT-R and Z are permanent parts of the Nissan lineup and aren't going anywhere. So even though both cars are aging and dated, at least fans don't have to worry about them being canceled. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,468
Drives: 14' 370z Sport Magma
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Sold: 2014 Magnetic Black Base. Current: 2014 Magma Red 370z Sport | ARK Grip Exhaust | 25mm HR Spacers | GTR Button | DRL Mod |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[MAZOC] Official "Off-Topic" Discussion Thread | m4a1mustang | MAZOC | 6670 | 09-06-2018 07:21 PM |
Official Insurance Premium Discussion Thread | nogoodname | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 421 | 04-06-2013 11:37 PM |
Nissan 370Z Official Specs Released from Nissan 11.15.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 32 | 02-20-2012 01:14 AM |
Nissan 370Z Official Specs Released from Nissan 11.15.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 24 | 09-21-2011 11:10 AM |
Nissan USA releases Official Nissan 370Z pictures 10.29.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 15 | 11-10-2008 08:17 AM |