Originally Posted by Chuck33079 Ricer, the only issue with the cars you compare it against is that they all sell 10x times what a Z does. They sell hundreds of
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-02-2016, 10:02 AM | #1621 (permalink) | ||
Track Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 597
Drives: To the Pizza joint.
Rep Power: 7720 |
Quote:
Also - the Aisin transmission you mention is now exclusively used in the FRS/BRZ. The Lexus has dumped it as an option altogether. I'm not aware of another vehicle that uses it in the Toyota/Lexus lineup. You mention margins - the current Z still shares a platform with the Q50 and upcoming Q60, and it's highly unlikely the next Z goes to something else. They can stand to slightly retool the 370Z's existing manual and pair it with the VR30DETT, especially when the sales of the Q50 are continually increasing to make up for any costs you incur customizing its platform enough to extend it to another product like the Z. Quote:
Second - as I mentioned above, the FRS/BRZ is now the singular user of said transmission. At one point, 60% of those sales were manual transmissions. I would say the cost of producing that transmission is more than justified. Third - yes Ghosn is a money guy... a money guy smart enough to know that you don't toss a product into the mix of other products you're competing with that's short on offerings, especially when those offerings may push potential buyers to the competition. We have plenty of 7AT lovers here, but how many guys would have explored their options a bit more extensively if a 6MT wasn't offered in the Z? Sure the Z is getting outsold by those cars, but I can't imagine offering a manual hurt the numbers. Finally - the GT-R was meant to be the bleeding edge performance marque for Nissan. To slightly oversimplify, currently, bleeding edge speed means dual clutch automated transmissions. The transmission of the GT-R is mounted in the rear of the vehicle for various reasons, but the main one would be weight distribution. A manual transmission absolutely does not fit the mantra of this car. The GR6 is massively expensive to produce. I believe OEM replacement assemblies hover around $20k. If you were designing a car to be the fastest thing possibly obtained for under $80k (at release), and its transmission was one of the main facilitators to that goal, would you spend time engineering another transmission that would have to be designed unlike anything you've ever designed, and in the end, it would severely inhibit the performance goals of the car? Sure many of us would have loved a manual in this car. However, even beyond the business case, a manual tranny didn't make sense for the R35 on so many levels, and it's really not a good example of a counterpoint, especially when you're comparing its situation to a car that costs 30%. It's like asking why the upcoming Ford GT doesn't have the same powertrain options as an EcoBoost Mustang.
__________________
|
||
03-02-2016, 02:44 PM | #1622 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,427
Drives: 17 6MT M2
Rep Power: 18754 |
Not sure all of your facts are correct or interpreted correctly Ricer but I'm not going to argue them as I hope you're right on this and I'm wrong.
I'm with you that sure Nissan will most likely use the Q50/60 platform but I'd like to see Nissan integrate some of the GTR technology as well. So we'll most likely get the 3 & 400 hp tt engines. But if Nissan used the low center of gravity weight model (like the GTR) and move the transmission to the rear, but keep it a rwd. This would definitely be a Z I'd be interested in and wouldn't mind paying more for it than the current Z. |
03-02-2016, 03:26 PM | #1623 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Delaware
Posts: 715
Drives: 09 MB 370Z Touring
Rep Power: 21 |
I don't think the Z is big enough for a transmission in the rear. The GT-R and Aston Martins are both larger than the Z. Plus we have that massive fuel tank, which I honestly want to keep since we are one of the few cars capable of 500 miles between gas stops.
__________________
2009 370Z Touring with Sport |
03-02-2016, 04:17 PM | #1624 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 597
Drives: To the Pizza joint.
Rep Power: 7720 |
There's a video (or two) about the development of the Q50 Eau Rouge and how they got to where they got with the configuration of the prototype. When they got to the decision of using the GT-R engine, there were several reasons why they didn't go with its transmission. The first one? It didn't fit - the platform of the GT-R was designed around the chassis and powertrain. It was never intended to be a "volume" car per say, and they had the luxury of doing whatever they wanted with it.
So the transmission choice for the Eau Rouge concept? The M56 7AT (with a few tweaks). The Q50 Eau Rouge was created with a single mandate - raid the parts bin. There were to be no one-off parts. It is a GT-R motor with the AWD system and transmission from the M56S. This is why, as a concept it was completely driveable. This circles back to my belief in shoehorning the existing 6MT into the next gen Z. The gearing is fine, and if it needs some tweaking, they can pull a 2015 Nismo and modify the final drive on it and bill it as improved acceleration or, in the opposite direction, improved fuel economy. Also, if the M's 7AT can be mated to a VR38 without extensive rework, then the Z's 6MT can be mated to the new VR30. If the sales tank on the next gen Z, then you haven't built a new transmission that can't be used in any other model. You haven't designed a platform that won't be used elsewhere. You haven't built a motor that isn't being used elsewhere. It doesn't get less risky than that for an automaker, honestly. All the pieces are there. It's just a matter of putting them together. |
03-02-2016, 08:11 PM | #1625 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
Nissan has axed so many concepts I'm beginning to question if the GRIP Z chassis will be used but I'm hoping. But also... the G37 was about 3700lbs and the Z is about 3,300lbs. The Q60 coupe is supposed to be about 3,400 to 3,500lbs.
If Nissan still uses the modified FM platform for the next Z? That's 3,000-3,100lbs. If you average it against the logical the current Z and G platform. Increasing Q sales would mean the Z will see production as it shows interest in the platform.
__________________
Favorite Quote. "I'm not gonna kill you... I'm just gonna Bash Your Face In" Jack Nicholson-"The Shining". 1980 |
03-06-2016, 02:53 PM | #1626 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,468
Drives: 14' 370z Sport Magma
Rep Power: 13 |
Of course, more rumors but I hope that's not near the expected design (Picture).
2018 Nissan Z | car review @ Top Speed
__________________
Sold: 2014 Magnetic Black Base. Current: 2014 Magma Red 370z Sport | ARK Grip Exhaust | 25mm HR Spacers | GTR Button | DRL Mod |
03-07-2016, 11:18 AM | #1627 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 258
Drives: 2013 370Z
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2016, 02:38 PM | #1629 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Delaware
Posts: 715
Drives: 09 MB 370Z Touring
Rep Power: 21 |
I like where they said '2 seater convertible with 2.0L turbo hybrid motor'. They've been saying the same thing about the Honda S2000 coming back as such.
__________________
2009 370Z Touring with Sport |
03-07-2016, 03:06 PM | #1630 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Shawnee KS
Posts: 5,698
Drives: 15 Magma Red 6MT
Rep Power: 2684377 |
I'm surprised someone hasn't said this is the new Z:
Nissan Concept 2020 Vision Gran Turismo | Nissan USA
__________________
2015 Magma Red 6MT Sport Tech/2012 Fairlady MB 6MT Base (RIP 08032018)https://www.nicoclub.com/FSM/370Z/Coupe/ |
03-24-2016, 04:06 PM | #1631 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,045
Drives: 09 370Z Touring/Sprt
Rep Power: 10091 |
For all those hoping nissan would discontinue the Z :P
Nissan Has No Plans to Build a Smaller Miata Competitor But not all the news from Nakamura was disappointing. He also said the GT-R and Z are permanent parts of the Nissan lineup and aren't going anywhere. So even though both cars are aging and dated, at least fans don't have to worry about them being canceled. |
03-24-2016, 05:18 PM | #1632 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,468
Drives: 14' 370z Sport Magma
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
__________________
Sold: 2014 Magnetic Black Base. Current: 2014 Magma Red 370z Sport | ARK Grip Exhaust | 25mm HR Spacers | GTR Button | DRL Mod |
|
03-24-2016, 11:31 PM | #1635 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
thats good news, now nissan give us something more concrete!
__________________
Top Secret | EVO-R | Fujimura Auto | Shine Auto | Seibon | MRWorks | Swift | SPC | SSR | UpRev | Project Kics | NST | Titek | Eibach | Nismo | Whiteline | Quaife | Invidia | Fly1 | CF Element | Carbon Signal
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[MAZOC] Official "Off-Topic" Discussion Thread | m4a1mustang | MAZOC | 6670 | 09-06-2018 08:21 PM |
Official Insurance Premium Discussion Thread | nogoodname | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 421 | 04-07-2013 12:37 AM |
Nissan 370Z Official Specs Released from Nissan 11.15.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 32 | 02-20-2012 02:14 AM |
Nissan 370Z Official Specs Released from Nissan 11.15.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 24 | 09-21-2011 12:10 PM |
Nissan USA releases Official Nissan 370Z pictures 10.29.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 15 | 11-10-2008 09:17 AM |