Nissan 370Z Forum  

Motortrend tests 2015 Nismo 370Z

Originally Posted by MJB And it doesn't look like its 0-60mph or 1/4 time improved with the new 3.9 rear end. 3400lbs? Why did it go up in weight? 3400lbs

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > Nissan 370Z General Discussions


Like Tree50Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2014, 11:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
TerribleONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 10,203
Drives: WOT
Rep Power: 5851
TerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond reputeTerribleONE has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJB View Post
And it doesn't look like its 0-60mph or 1/4 time improved with the new 3.9 rear end. 3400lbs? Why did it go up in weight?
3400lbs is not far off from what a 7AT/NAV Z weighs IIRC
__________________
638WHP 541WTQ @ 13.5PSI
Build thread
TerribleONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2014, 12:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
MJB
A True Z Fanatic
 
MJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tacoma, WA
Age: 41
Posts: 1,498
Drives: a POS truck
Rep Power: 496
MJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerribleONE View Post
3400lbs is not far off from what a 7AT/NAV Z weighs IIRC
Ok, so they listed the weight for one that is equipped with a 7AT? Because the stat sheet says 6mt... I remember the 09-14 Nismo's were 3350lbs.
__________________
09 Nismo #0483 sold. Viper or C7 next time around.
MJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2014, 12:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419
Jordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJB View Post
Ok, so they listed the weight for one that is equipped with a 7AT? Because the stat sheet says 6mt... I remember the 09-14 Nismo's were 3350lbs.
They have a lot to say about clutch feel, so I'm sure (despite some of the pics) it was the MT.

I'm wondering if the new gearing isn't as much of an improvement as one would think on the track.

Either that or it is literally just barely compensating for any extra weight from the few amenities it has (still more than last iteration of Nismo, or so I thought).

I think tires and all that are the same -- poorer braking and slightly worse laptimes make me think it's either the gearing is now numerically better but functionally worse or it's gained 50 lbs somewhere from the leather and nav and maybe different final gearset?

Hmm.

Not trying to start my whole frothing mad rant again or anything, but I am curious as to how the AT fares by comparison -- it too has different gearing than the standard 7AT Z.

Or, hell. Maybe they had either a hotter day or a fatter driver (or both) than the last time.
jpkirk likes this.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it.

Last edited by Jordo!; 11-28-2014 at 12:47 AM.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2014, 01:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
MJB
A True Z Fanatic
 
MJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tacoma, WA
Age: 41
Posts: 1,498
Drives: a POS truck
Rep Power: 496
MJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond reputeMJB has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post

Hmm.

Not trying to start my whole frothing mad rant again or anything, but I am curious as to how the AT fares by comparison -- it too has different gearing than the standard 7AT Z.

Or, hell. Maybe they had either a hotter day or a fatter driver (or both) than the last time.
That is true. I think 13.5 1/4 time is a bit slower compared to the previous years. I'm sure the AT can get closer to 13 flat.
__________________
09 Nismo #0483 sold. Viper or C7 next time around.
MJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2015 370z Nismo in Montreal QC Mtl-Z New Nismo 370Z Owner 7 01-01-2015 04:37 PM
2015 370z Nismo - Are we getting it? Tree70 Canada 81 10-17-2014 03:19 AM
Any 2015 Red 370z Nismo Pics? SeanZ Nismo 370Z 9 10-04-2014 05:56 PM
2015 370Z Nismo Specs S1L3NoZ Nismo 370Z 38 09-04-2014 05:34 PM
New Motortrend Article: "2009 Best Drivers Car" features Nismo 370z. Phimosis Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip 5 09-07-2009 06:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2