![]() |
That depends on the car still. The corvette has a full chassis. There are cars that only have half frames (Like F-Bodies and mustangs). But more importantly, there's a HUGE
|
View Poll Results: Which would you go with? | |||
Targa |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
117 | 52.00% |
T-Top |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
43 | 19.11% |
Convertible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 1.33% |
Coupe |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
62 | 27.56% |
Voters: 225. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,853
Drives: 02 Corvette Z06
Rep Power: 590 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
That depends on the car still. The corvette has a full chassis. There are cars that only have half frames (Like F-Bodies and mustangs).
But more importantly, there's a HUGE difference between convertibles and roadsters: Roadsters were designed to be topless. Their frames are tough from the get-go. Convertibles, however, are usually an afterthought. Hence the extra crap on them to make them more rigid... But that doesn't mean they're as rigid as a coupe. BTW, I felt the lack of stiffness in my Trans Am which was a T-Top. That frame flexed and twisted like it was NOTHING. Taking turn, or going up and down drive ways was a fantastic reminder how crappy the half frames were. It felt slightly better when the tops were on, but not much. And the car DESPERATELY needed sub-frame connectors which I'd never got around to doing. You can certainly feel rigidity in a car, convertible vs. coupe. You CAN feel that. Added weight is a mute point, but for racing, convertible isn't the smartest idea (suspension and rigidity wise)
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06 - Totaled 2003 Corvette Z06 50th Anniversary |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|