Nissan 370Z Forum  

Jan 19, 2014 article: next 370Z

Originally Posted by brucelidat and now they're back to a v6 for the m4 so... you missed my point. what i was trying to say is that, IFFF anything, go

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > Nissan 370Z General Discussions


Like Tree92Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2014, 11:05 PM   #121 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Codename067's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Hills, CA
Posts: 386
Drives: 370z, R1, 636
Rep Power: 14
Codename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond reputeCodename067 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelidat View Post
and now they're back to a v6 for the m4 so...
you missed my point. what i was trying to say is that, IFFF anything, go forward not backwards [and by that i dont mean make a v8 Z..]. def keep it at 6.

im not sure what bmw was thinking by making a v8 m3. as fun as it was to drive and as much of a beast as it was, it was trying to over reach its "comfort zone" imo. v6 suited the e46 nicely..they shouldve kept it at that while generating more power for future m3s. let the bigger boys Ms take the v8+ engines and keep the m3 at 6.

v6 is the perfect balance in my opinion. if nissan goes lower...they will eventually [probably] realize it wasnt a smart idea and go back up to 6 again.

my 2 cents
Justice97 likes this.
Codename067 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 07:07 PM   #122 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Magic Bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,427
Drives: 17 6MT M2
Rep Power: 18754
Magic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond reputeMagic Bus has a reputation beyond repute
Default

As per OP's first post, Z designer Shiro Nakamura and product chief Andy Palmer are looking at a smaller Z with a turbo 4.

Most automobile manufacturers will use the same engine across a number of their cars (Nissan does it with the VQ) in order to keep costs in check. Here's my questions and I want to know what you folks think.

If Nissan did in fact come out with the smaller/lighter Z with a turbo 4, what other Nissan cars would it power?
Magic Bus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 08:18 PM   #123 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
tjlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tacoma
Age: 53
Posts: 2,496
Drives: Z34, R35
Rep Power: 20
tjlazer is just really nicetjlazer is just really nicetjlazer is just really nicetjlazer is just really nice
Send a message via ICQ to tjlazer Send a message via MSN to tjlazer Send a message via Yahoo to tjlazer
Default

They need to call the new Z the 370Z Twin Turbo. They did the same thing with the Z31 and Z32.
__________________
2009 370Z Monterey Blue,Nismo Conversion,RE-11's, K&N Typhoon intakes,Blue Kickplates,Homelink,FI 18" CBE,ERZ HFCs,Hotchkis sways, Swift Spec-R, EVO-R Highwing, UPREV
tjlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 10:26 PM   #124 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 387
Drives: C172 Skyhawk GIII
Rep Power: 175
Redglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Bus View Post
As per OP's first post, Z designer Shiro Nakamura and product chief Andy Palmer are looking at a smaller Z with a turbo 4.

Most automobile manufacturers will use the same engine across a number of their cars (Nissan does it with the VQ) in order to keep costs in check. Here's my questions and I want to know what you folks think.

If Nissan did in fact come out with the smaller/lighter Z with a turbo 4, what other Nissan cars would it power?
Hopefully not juke or sentra, we know the new maxima sedan will be a 3.5 w/ some electric motors.

Most likely will be found in the new G coupe/sedan (Q50 something whatever I am calling it G coupe)
-knowing that G coupe/sedan are pretty massive cars, Can't expect any less power/torque or they will risk becoming slower than civics.

So I'd say a high boost 4, north of 300hp 300tq from a 2.0+ displacement,

Would love to see less mass in the chasis, but wouldn't be upset if it was close to 3200lbs w/ more power... as long as it doesn't gain weight.
Redglare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 10:41 PM   #125 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Cell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,449
Drives: A Garbage Truck
Rep Power: 21
Cell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond reputeCell has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjlazer View Post
They need to call the new Z the 370Z Twin Turbo. They did the same thing with the Z31 and Z32.
They can always just eliminate the 370 and just call it the Z. No point going backwards to a 200Z.

Or call it the Z35.
Cell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 11:04 PM   #126 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
roplusbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 2,360
Drives: 2007 350Z NISMO
Rep Power: 23
roplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond reputeroplusbee has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to roplusbee Send a message via Yahoo to roplusbee
Default

They could somewhat easily turbo the VQ. The issue would be the cooling capacities and space for said components. On the flip side, they would have to hold peoples hands on the maintenance plans and force the mechanics/salesman to actually train on the systems instead of following a script.

I for one wouldn't really care if the Z35 comes with a turbo 4-cylinder. I just wouldn't consider purchasing it. If they give us a 6-cylinder with some nifty stuff like direct injection and hybrid electric systems, I would consider it depending on the implementation. I am happy with my TT-Z now and would not want to give up the smile she puts on my face for something that I have to rework to get the same type of thing.

They could use this motor if they are indeed in league with Mercedes Benz; 2015 Mercedes-Benz E400 Twin-Turbo V-6
__________________
2007 350Z NISMO #0618: Zerolift | UPREV | F.I. | Greddy | Competition Clutch | Injector Dynamics | Aeromotive | Pioneer | JL

Last edited by roplusbee; 01-25-2014 at 11:13 PM. Reason: Added a possible TT 6-cylinder motor to debate
roplusbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 04:10 AM   #127 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Z_ealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,045
Drives: 09 370Z Touring/Sprt
Rep Power: 10091
Z_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redglare View Post
Hopefully not juke or sentra, we know the new maxima sedan will be a 3.5 w/ some electric motors.

Most likely will be found in the new G coupe/sedan (Q50 something whatever I am calling it G coupe)
-knowing that G coupe/sedan are pretty massive cars, Can't expect any less power/torque or they will risk becoming slower than civics.

So I'd say a high boost 4, north of 300hp 300tq from a 2.0+ displacement,

Would love to see less mass in the chasis, but wouldn't be upset if it was close to 3200lbs w/ more power... as long as it doesn't gain weight.

i would agree, but it has already been put out that Nissan's weight target for the next Z is around 2800lbs
Z_ealot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 09:43 AM   #128 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 387
Drives: C172 Skyhawk GIII
Rep Power: 175
Redglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond reputeRedglare has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z_ealot View Post
i would agree, but it has already been put out that Nissan's weight target for the next Z is around 2800lbs
Seriously doubt they will meet it w/ out alienating a lot of the customers.

Look at some of the recently released cars, most had weight reduction goals - and almost all ended up gaining weight. Just to name a few, the c7 chief engineer said they originally wanted the new vette to be ~100lbs lighter, it ended up being a little heavier vs the outgoing model.
Redglare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 10:20 AM   #129 (permalink)
b15
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,229
Drives: 4drz
Rep Power: 36571
b15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

The only thing holding me back from a turbo 4 is the sound. For me, thats part of the sports car experience and I just dont like how 4cyl sound...especially with exhaust. I personally would like a downsized v6 turbo instead.
zguynate likes this.
b15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 12:02 PM   #130 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Chuck33079's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29539
Chuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codename067 View Post
you missed my point. what i was trying to say is that, IFFF anything, go forward not backwards [and by that i dont mean make a v8 Z..]. def keep it at 6.

im not sure what bmw was thinking by making a v8 m3. as fun as it was to drive and as much of a beast as it was, it was trying to over reach its "comfort zone" imo. v6 suited the e46 nicely..they shouldve kept it at that while generating more power for future m3s. let the bigger boys Ms take the v8+ engines and keep the m3 at 6.

v6 is the perfect balance in my opinion. if nissan goes lower...they will eventually [probably] realize it wasnt a smart idea and go back up to 6 again.

my 2 cents
I'd buy a V8 Z in a heartbeat. A 560Z would be awesome. And the E46, like all of the M3s before it came with an inline 6.
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent
Chuck33079 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 12:35 PM   #131 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Rockhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 86
Drives: '13 Z Touring
Rep Power: 13
Rockhound will become famous soon enoughRockhound will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b15 View Post
...I personally would like a downsized v6 turbo instead.
I'm sure this has been mentioned already, but could this be accomplished with the VQ25HR?
Rockhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 06:42 PM   #132 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Z_ealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,045
Drives: 09 370Z Touring/Sprt
Rep Power: 10091
Z_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond reputeZ_ealot has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redglare View Post
Seriously doubt they will meet it w/ out alienating a lot of the customers.

Look at some of the recently released cars, most had weight reduction goals - and almost all ended up gaining weight. Just to name a few, the c7 chief engineer said they originally wanted the new vette to be ~100lbs lighter, it ended up being a little heavier vs the outgoing model.
not really sure how reducing the Z's weight would alienate customers, but seeing as Nissan has been one of the few manufacturers to keep on goal as far as weight reductions in their vehicles i would not be skeptical about them actually reducing the weight of the Z as they have consistently been able to knock at least 100-200lbs or more off of all their vehicles that they have released lately
Z_ealot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 07:14 PM   #133 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
alphajam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: DirtyA
Posts: 358
Drives: slow
Rep Power: 14
alphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant futurealphajam has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Bus View Post
As per OP's first post, Z designer Shiro Nakamura and product chief Andy Palmer are looking at a smaller Z with a turbo 4.

Most automobile manufacturers will use the same engine across a number of their cars (Nissan does it with the VQ) in order to keep costs in check. Here's my questions and I want to know what you folks think.

If Nissan did in fact come out with the smaller/lighter Z with a turbo 4, what other Nissan cars would it power?
the new 510
__________________
l Z1 l NISMO l FORGESTAR l SWIFT l WHITELINE l AEROQUIP l MOMENTUM l STILLEN l SPARCO l OSIRIS l SCHROTH l APEX*I l SPL l AUTOPOWER l TOMEI l NST l More to come...

alphajam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 08:15 PM   #134 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Eclipz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Tampa
Posts: 360
Drives: 06 Eclipse GS
Rep Power: 12
Eclipz is on a distinguished road
Default

Nissan should leave the turbo 4 for the IDx and make the Z slightly lower displacement but with a supercharger, or a high revving V8
Eclipz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 09:16 PM   #135 (permalink)
b15
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,229
Drives: 4drz
Rep Power: 36571
b15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond reputeb15 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockhound View Post
I'm sure this has been mentioned already, but could this be accomplished with the VQ25HR?
Nah. The VQ25 isn't that great of an engine. Highly unlikely but it would be cool to see a new 3.0L v6.
b15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tour d'Orange 2014 - January 1, 2014 zero Southern California Region 3 12-27-2013 02:34 PM
2014 Chevrolet Camaro LS7, Twin-Turbo V-6 Revealed In 2014 GM Document 96bigbody Other Vehicles 2 12-21-2012 08:47 PM
350Z vs 370Z article from importtuner.com alexanderb Nissan 370Z General Discussions 6 08-18-2010 03:39 AM
370Z Article @ Fox News 2theextreme Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery 4 07-10-2009 12:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2