![]() |
If you don't like the 4 banger (which you won't know until you try it...) then swap it for a LS V8
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 876
Drives: With the blinker on.
Rep Power: 24 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Boosting the current v6 would be cheap and super-effective... That's all I'm saying. Who wouldn't want a 450+ hp Z with parts that are interchangeable with ones from the past 6 years? It wouldn't even require retooling the factory.
![]()
__________________
2009 370z #206 (all mods are Home Depot) 2009 Ducati 848 (full Ohlins, Termignoni, etc) 2003 Grand Cherokee (long arms, big tires, 4.56, lockers) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,230
Drives: Z34 | MK7 | F82
Rep Power: 3661 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() 2013 MB NISSAN 370Z SPORT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Tampa
Posts: 360
Drives: 06 Eclipse GS
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
![]()
If they make it a turbo 4 they better reduce the weight of the car substantially, not just because of the smaller engine. the current Z weighs what? 3400 lbs? The new Z better shed 600-800 lbs if they want it to perform at a higher level.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Hills, CA
Posts: 386
Drives: 370z, R1, 636
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
If anything, if anything, the cost should at least stay the same. This car is still tough to sell at dealerships, and worse to lease due to its """shitty""" residual value [or so the dealership claims..bs]. A possible 4 cylinder displacement would definitely be disappointing, quite the opposite of what bmw did with their m3, when they took it from the v6 e46 to the monster v8 on the e92.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: temple city, ca
Posts: 2,432
Drives: 2011 370z 7AT GM Sp
Rep Power: 31 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
and now they're back to a v6 for the m4 so...
__________________
Works Emotion CR Ultimate - FI CBE w/ 18" resonators - Ecutek - eibach sways - Quaife - FI LTH w/race cats - kw v3 - spl - Topgunz SC - 488whp 398trq |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Hills, CA
Posts: 386
Drives: 370z, R1, 636
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
you missed my point. what i was trying to say is that, IFFF anything, go forward not backwards [and by that i dont mean make a v8 Z..]. def keep it at 6.
im not sure what bmw was thinking by making a v8 m3. as fun as it was to drive and as much of a beast as it was, it was trying to over reach its "comfort zone" imo. v6 suited the e46 nicely..they shouldve kept it at that while generating more power for future m3s. let the bigger boys Ms take the v8+ engines and keep the m3 at 6. v6 is the perfect balance in my opinion. if nissan goes lower...they will eventually [probably] realize it wasnt a smart idea and go back up to 6 again. my 2 cents |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29539 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,427
Drives: 17 6MT M2
Rep Power: 18755 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
As per OP's first post, Z designer Shiro Nakamura and product chief Andy Palmer are looking at a smaller Z with a turbo 4.
Most automobile manufacturers will use the same engine across a number of their cars (Nissan does it with the VQ) in order to keep costs in check. Here's my questions and I want to know what you folks think. If Nissan did in fact come out with the smaller/lighter Z with a turbo 4, what other Nissan cars would it power? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 387
Drives: C172 Skyhawk GIII
Rep Power: 175 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Most likely will be found in the new G coupe/sedan (Q50 something whatever I am calling it G coupe) -knowing that G coupe/sedan are pretty massive cars, Can't expect any less power/torque or they will risk becoming slower than civics. So I'd say a high boost 4, north of 300hp 300tq from a 2.0+ displacement, Would love to see less mass in the chasis, but wouldn't be upset if it was close to 3200lbs w/ more power... as long as it doesn't gain weight. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,045
Drives: 09 370Z Touring/Sprt
Rep Power: 10091 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
i would agree, but it has already been put out that Nissan's weight target for the next Z is around 2800lbs |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 387
Drives: C172 Skyhawk GIII
Rep Power: 175 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Look at some of the recently released cars, most had weight reduction goals - and almost all ended up gaining weight. Just to name a few, the c7 chief engineer said they originally wanted the new vette to be ~100lbs lighter, it ended up being a little heavier vs the outgoing model. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tour d'Orange 2014 - January 1, 2014 | zero | Southern California Region | 3 | 12-27-2013 01:34 PM |
2014 Chevrolet Camaro LS7, Twin-Turbo V-6 Revealed In 2014 GM Document | 96bigbody | Other Vehicles | 2 | 12-21-2012 07:47 PM |
350Z vs 370Z article from importtuner.com | alexanderb | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 6 | 08-18-2010 02:39 AM |
370Z Article @ Fox News | 2theextreme | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 4 | 07-10-2009 11:13 AM |