Camaro website with a 370Z review

DEpointfive0

First of all, what the hell is this interior? Or who's is it?



Link:
2014 Nissan 370Z Nismo 3.7-liter V6 350 hp Overview - CamaroCarPlace

__________________
Do YOU want to know what/where I got my username from?

gomer_110

For some reason I'm thinking that might be the interior out of the crowd-sourced Z that Nissan did a year or two ago.

__________________
'11 370Z Nismo #528 Fast Intentions | Stillen | Motordyne | Uprev | CSF | Zspeed | Z1 Motorsports | AST | Swift | SPC | SPL | Whiteline | Hotchkis | Bride | Schroth | Robispec | Cusco | Nismo | Volk | Forgestar | Hoosier | RJM
'17 Titan Bone Stock

Tazicon

0-60 in 5.1? Hummm that doesn't seem correct to me but then again its just a number.

mag_black

I feel like I've read that review from somewhere else???

__________________

DEpointfive0

Maybe? I hope it's not a repost

__________________
Do YOU want to know what/where I got my username from?

BeemaaZ

I am really digging the Recaro Sportster Seats. Can Anyone who has the same seats chime in if they are comfortable for DD or long rides?

__________________
SoCal 40th Meet
Old & New Mods
** Steering Lock RECALL**
Own 40th 370Z? Get the build # and the Manuf. date here

white_wolf

That's the custom interior for the Project Z car. The seats are recaros.

__________________
1998 Honda Prelude - Sold (and is sometimes missed)
2006 Infiniti M35 S - Sold (not missed...at all)
2010 Nissan 370z - Current

nmjaxx9

I test drove the last generation maro before getting the Z, plenty of torque. The Z however is nimble as ever.

VABAM

The interior shots are definitely "Project 370Z" that was unveiled at ZDayZ 2012. Nissan/NISMO brought it back for ZDayZ 2013 along with a Juke-R.

I didn't get any interior shots but here is a shot I got of the Project 370Z next to the Juke-R at Deal's Gap, NC during ZDayZ 2013.




I have more pics of the Juke-R here; My Z with the Juke-R and Project 370Z if any one is interested.

__________________

Husbarn

That number is correct. This car can do 0-60 in little over 5 seconds.

Why you think it's not correct?

Firebase99

Ive read this before a few months ago. Was confused too.

theDreamer

I sat in the seat (not in the crowd source Z) once before, they are nice, not sure on DD.
I do know those seats are very common in many OEM cars, some are modified with higher backs depending on the car but overall it is the same seat.

__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN
theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY
Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram

Rockhound

Oh, I dunno, maybe these?

Car & Driver: 4.9 sec (Nov. '08 )
Car & Driver: 4.6 sec (7AT, Apr. '09)
Car & Driver: 4.9 sec (Apr. '09)
Motor Trend: 4.7 sec (Nov. '08 )
Motor Trend: 4.9 sec (Apr. '11)
Motor Trend: 4.8 sec (Aug. '12)

That's not to say that all tests resulted in sub-5 second runs; the auto rags that are usually slower (Edmunds, Autoweek) posted around 5.1 sec times. Still, choosing the slowest of these is a bit disingenuous.

Averaging these times above along with a few others (sans the 4.6 sec 7AT) results in a composite of 4.9 seconds.

osirus

I was going to just state the same thing in regards to that post by Husbarn. There are multiple sources out there which show much quicker times. I think that this review was not as accurate as what has been done by other sources. At the slowest average, with AT, 370z attains 0-60 in under 5 seconds.

Husbarn

That number is accurate. Actually it is posted that that time is for 0-100 km/h, which is equal to 0-62 mph, but in that review they just posted 0-100 km/h or ~0-60 mph (time was meant for 0-100 km/h). This car maybe can accelerate in less than 5 seconds for 0-60 mph, but 0-62 mph takes more time.

Go again to that review and you'll see