Camaro website with a 370Z review
 

First of all, what the hell is this interior? Or who's is it?

http://www.camarocarplace.com/wp-con...rior-seats.jpg

Link:
2014 Nissan 370Z Nismo 3.7-liter V6 350 hp Overview - CamaroCarPlace

For some reason I'm thinking that might be the interior out of the crowd-sourced Z that Nissan did a year or two ago.

0-60 in 5.1? Hummm that doesn't seem correct to me but then again its just a number.

I feel like I've read that review from somewhere else???

Maybe? I hope it's not a repost

I am really digging the Recaro Sportster Seats. Can Anyone who has the same seats chime in if they are comfortable for DD or long rides?

That's the custom interior for the Project Z car. The seats are recaros.

I test drove the last generation maro before getting the Z, plenty of torque. The Z however is nimble as ever. :driving:

The interior shots are definitely "Project 370Z" that was unveiled at ZDayZ 2012. Nissan/NISMO brought it back for ZDayZ 2013 along with a Juke-R.

I didn't get any interior shots but here is a shot I got of the Project 370Z next to the Juke-R at Deal's Gap, NC during ZDayZ 2013.

http://www.the370z.com/members/vabam...-deals-gap.jpg


I have more pics of the Juke-R here; My Z with the Juke-R and Project 370Z if any one is interested.

That number is correct. This car can do 0-60 in little over 5 seconds.

Why you think it's not correct?

Ive read this before a few months ago. Was confused too.

I sat in the seat (not in the crowd source Z) once before, they are nice, not sure on DD.
I do know those seats are very common in many OEM cars, some are modified with higher backs depending on the car but overall it is the same seat.

Oh, I dunno, maybe these?

Car & Driver: 4.9 sec (Nov. '08 )
Car & Driver: 4.6 sec (7AT, Apr. '09)
Car & Driver: 4.9 sec (Apr. '09)
Motor Trend: 4.7 sec (Nov. '08 )
Motor Trend: 4.9 sec (Apr. '11)
Motor Trend: 4.8 sec (Aug. '12)

That's not to say that all tests resulted in sub-5 second runs; the auto rags that are usually slower (Edmunds, Autoweek) posted around 5.1 sec times. Still, choosing the slowest of these is a bit disingenuous.

Averaging these times above along with a few others (sans the 4.6 sec 7AT) results in a composite of 4.9 seconds.

I was going to just state the same thing in regards to that post by Husbarn. There are multiple sources out there which show much quicker times. I think that this review was not as accurate as what has been done by other sources. At the slowest average, with AT, 370z attains 0-60 in under 5 seconds.

That number is accurate. Actually it is posted that that time is for 0-100 km/h, which is equal to 0-62 mph, but in that review they just posted 0-100 km/h or ~0-60 mph (time was meant for 0-100 km/h). This car maybe can accelerate in less than 5 seconds for 0-60 mph, but 0-62 mph takes more time.

Go again to that review and you'll see :)