Is there a reason Nissan no longer builds a 2+2 Z? I was unable to find anything about this topic using the search function so please forgive me if this
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-10-2009, 12:39 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wayne, PA/Ventnor, NJ
Posts: 72
Drives: 09 MB 6MT,03 V8 4Run
Rep Power: 16 |
No 2+2?
Is there a reason Nissan no longer builds a 2+2 Z? I was unable to find anything about this topic using the search function so please forgive me if this has been brought up in past posts. I know Nissan hasn’t built a 2+2 Z since 1996, but it seems like more people might be interested in buying if there was a place behind the front seats to throw a few extra items for weekend trips, etc. Is it because they don’t want to compete with the G37?
|
08-10-2009, 01:01 PM | #2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 55,385
Drives: on two wheels
Rep Power: 6962 |
Probably. The Z works best as a 2-seat sportscar.
__________________
- Steve Zs & Coffee - Saturdays at 10AM in Fairfax, VA and Columbia, MD (Click the banner!) LIKE us on Facebook! |
08-10-2009, 01:05 PM | #3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
Probably the G37, you want space plus extra luxury you got with the G, the Z is the true sports car with no thought about extra features needed (for the most part).
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
08-10-2009, 01:14 PM | #4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 2,883
Drives: 370Z Sport
Rep Power: 976 |
Yeah...Most 2+2 variations are ugly and lose the original proportions of the car. Look what they did to the stunningly beautiful XKE when the 2+2'd it.. The old Z's weren't much better..
|
08-10-2009, 08:08 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 349
Drives: Red Touring 7AT
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
__________________
My Gallery |
|
08-10-2009, 08:48 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Track Member
|
look at the Panerama or whatever that Monsterous thing porsche built lol. Don't put square block in round hole. lol. G37 pure and simple.
__________________
180 customs Headlights - Yantech Backup Camera - Projekt 1 - Stillen Gen 3- EVO-R V2 Foglight, EVO-R CF Diffuser, Carbon Fiber Element Steering wheel - Fast Intentions TDX/RHFC's - RJM A.F.P. - Z1 Oil Cooler - 2015 Nismo Conversion. |
08-10-2009, 09:15 PM | #7 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
The whole benefit of the 370 over the 350 is that it's more powerful on a shorter, wider platform. Adding rear seats would just lengthen the car and hurt the driving dynamics. Just to add though...the 370 does have two spaces behind the driver and passenger seats that can fit small bags like an overnight duffel.
|
08-10-2009, 09:19 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Administrator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Disneyland, Ca
Posts: 8,732
Drives: 🔰
Rep Power: 10 |
Nissan went back in the design to capture the feeling of the Original 240z. The 2+2 was not what there aiming at. Currently and for the future do you guys remember what the 76-77 280z 2+2 looked like? not very sports car looking.
Last edited by Trips; 08-10-2009 at 09:37 PM. |
08-11-2009, 08:35 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wayne, PA/Ventnor, NJ
Posts: 72
Drives: 09 MB 6MT,03 V8 4Run
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Thanks for all the replies...I will have to learn to pack lightly for weekend trips. Convincing my GF to hold her wheeled bag on her lap for 1.5 hours to make room for my clubs might not be so easy though. |
|
08-11-2009, 09:03 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 578
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 17 |
I love the way the G37s looks, too bad I cant afford it or I would have purchased that instead. I have a kid on the way, the back seat would have proved useful over the course of my babies first 10 years.
nonthless, I assumed the Z didnt have it for two reasons, the G37 already has it, why compete against their own brand? and because it makes the 370Z lighter faster shorter and more agile. |
08-11-2009, 01:01 PM | #12 (permalink) | ||
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 367
Drives: Red M6 Sport/Touring
Rep Power: 268 |
G37 it the new 2+2
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Mspeasl - Central Illinois 2009 - Solid Red, M6 '370' Sport/Touring (Delivered 7 April 09) |
||
09-24-2009, 02:22 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: BKLYN,NY/DFW,TX
Posts: 166
Drives: '10 370z7at B.C.
Rep Power: 16 |
The G37 and 370 strayed a lil in similarity as far as looks.
But if u look at 350z n G35. They really look like the same car Except one is 2 seat and the other is 2+2. Lastly the G35 lost 7hp. Different exhausts. The G37 has now has evolved as an idividual with a twin engine instead of the 2+2 Z. But I guess u can say it is still the 4 seat sibling. |
09-24-2009, 03:09 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs |
|
09-24-2009, 08:57 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: BKLYN,NY/DFW,TX
Posts: 166
Drives: '10 370z7at B.C.
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
As stated the G35 and 350 actually used to LOOK alike. The G37 and 370 DO NOT! |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|