The new Audi TTS is a good competitor to the Z though, not sure I am still on board with the styling of it but it is a solid performer.
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-19-2009, 09:14 PM | #181 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
The new Audi TTS is a good competitor to the Z though, not sure I am still on board with the styling of it but it is a solid performer. I really hope that euro model (not sure of its name) makes it to the US, it is a 5 cylinder Audi TT or something.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
11-19-2009, 09:18 PM | #182 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 3,298
Drives: the 2 balled club
Rep Power: 22 |
That would be the TTRS and its a speed demon. I think I would take that over the GT-R but dont think its coming here atleast not for awhile. Its 0 60 is 3.8 secs. But Im waiting for a good SC for the Z to come out and then the Z will fly like crazy.
__________________
2010 LS3 C6 Silver coupe corvette Last edited by Zsteve; 11-19-2009 at 09:20 PM. |
11-19-2009, 10:23 PM | #183 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 18
Drives: Mazdaspeed3
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I was referring to the 2009 TTS earlier when I said 0-60 in 5.6s. I was comparing the 2009 Audi to the 2009 Mazda. The 2010 Mazdaspeed3 is heavier and slower than the outgoing model, and the new Audi appears to be faster than the outgoing Audi. I looked up the specs on the 2010 TTS , and yes, it hits 60 mph in 4.9 sec with its quattro AWD. But to say it's faster beyond 60 mph is nonsense. It has the same hp than the Mazdaspeed3, a lot less torque, and the extra drivetrain losses of AWD, which makes it slower from anything but a dig. |
|
11-19-2009, 10:50 PM | #184 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: mission,tx
Posts: 58
Drives: '11 MK6 GTI
Rep Power: 16 |
2009 and 2010 TT-S models didn't have any engine changes made so they are both just as fast hitting the 0-60 in about 4.8-4.9 range. The one thing that could've played a role in the times you looked up was a transmission update that was needed. My friend has a 2009 TT-S and trust me that thing holds it's own across the whole powerband. I've driven it and it is in no way slow after 60 mph. MS3 is not as fast as TT-S, period.
Edit: I'm pretty sure your 5.6 time is of the convertible TT-S not coupe.. |
11-19-2009, 11:15 PM | #185 (permalink) | ||
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 18
Drives: Mazdaspeed3
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Sand123; 11-19-2009 at 11:18 PM. |
||
11-19-2009, 11:27 PM | #186 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: mission,tx
Posts: 58
Drives: '11 MK6 GTI
Rep Power: 16 |
alot of stuff goes into consideration not just weight and power. aerodynamic drag, suspension, tires, and other factors come into play also when it comes to straight line performance. Yes I am aware that AWD drivetrain losses may be higher but that doesn't mean the drivetrain in the MS3 is on par performance-wise with the one in the TT-S. I myself have an altima coupe with the V6 and I've raced him and he blows my car out of the water at any speed. Sure my car is around 100 lbs heavier than the TT-S but I believe the MS3 would be a more suitable competitor to my Altima than the TT-S
|
11-19-2009, 11:46 PM | #187 (permalink) | ||
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 18
Drives: Mazdaspeed3
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Mazdaspeed3 Drag coefficient: .32 Suspension, though not much of a factor, is already a variable in dyno testing. The Speed3 puts down more power than a stock TT-S. Tires? The TTS comes with better tires than a Mazda. Part of the price tag. Mazda gets shitty tires. Other factors? Please elaborate. Quote:
|
||
11-20-2009, 12:18 AM | #188 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: mission,tx
Posts: 58
Drives: '11 MK6 GTI
Rep Power: 16 |
I personally have run a 14.5 with 98 F weather and in other forums people have run 14.1 completely stock. Yes I agree the MS3 is faster than the Altima I never questioned that part. My point is that the MS3 and Altima would be more evenly matched. I insist that tires alone can play a vital role in dig races along with the suspension. And after 60 mph, while I haven't been in a MS3 or driven one, I bed to differ that the MS3 would be substantially faster if not the TT-S faster.. While I know people really dont like to go by magazine articles for saying which car is faster I have to say that all the numbers I have read are too big of a margin to not believe them. Seeing the numbers again I can see where the MS3 is certainly faster from 100-155 yet, I also see a reasonable margin for the TT-S to be faster from say 0-110 and anything in between.
Car and Driver numbers: Audi TTS Zero to 60 mph: 4.8 sec Zero to 100 mph: 12.4 sec Zero to 130 mph: 32.7 sec Street start, 5–60 mph: 6.0 sec Standing ¼-mile: 13.5 sec @ 104 mph MS3 Zero to 60 mph: 5.8 Zero to 100 mph: 14.8 Zero to 130: N/A |
11-20-2009, 08:00 AM | #190 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 3,298
Drives: the 2 balled club
Rep Power: 22 |
Quote:
Audi is quattro actually which means AWD only when it needs it then its FWD. Engine compression ratio can be a factor too. Launch control with AWD is a factor too. Funny you threw the magazine facts out and now that someone trumped your mag with another mag you want to play physics now. My chipped 2.0T K03 turbo (smaller than K04) FWD (not quattro) TT (not TTS) did 0 60 in 5.5 secs on the street.
__________________
2010 LS3 C6 Silver coupe corvette |
|
11-20-2009, 08:35 AM | #191 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gold Coast CT
Posts: 10,599
Drives: 2019 Corvette G.S.
Rep Power: 43 |
What is an Audi doing in this thread?
__________________
SOLD MY Z MARCH 2018 - another Core OG moves on - new ride 2019 Z Corvette Grand Sport - no mods necessary but already have eyes on HFC and intakes LOL IT NEVER ENDS. |
11-20-2009, 09:04 AM | #193 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Korea
Posts: 4,676
Drives: Manual
Rep Power: 847 |
Exactly.
Quote:
They start automatically its crazy and they're possibly the best car to drive for drive bys. SO quiet!
__________________
Love + Hardwork + Passion RIP SVTRacer |
|
11-20-2009, 11:15 AM | #194 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 3,298
Drives: the 2 balled club
Rep Power: 22 |
A prius drive by would be halarious , sad but halarious. I could just picture a bunch of thugs shooting out of a prius saying "atleast were going green"
__________________
2010 LS3 C6 Silver coupe corvette |
11-20-2009, 06:45 PM | #195 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 18
Drives: Mazdaspeed3
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
0-60 4.7 1/4 13.3 at 105 mph So are you telling me that the Audi TT-S is as fast as the 370Z then despite having a 70 hp disadvantage and the same weight? AWD cars are always going to be fast from a standstill acceleration test. It's the roll-on acceleration that gets them. I also see you managed to find the slowest numbers for the Mazda. Below are figures for the Mazda from Road and Track with links. Road and Track: RoadandTrack.com -- Long Term Road Tests - Long-term 2007 Mazdaspeed3 Modified! (11/2008) MS3 0-60 5.7 sec 0-100 13.8 sec 0-120 20 sec 1/4 14.1 sec at 101mph MS3 with intake alone (Road and Track's car) 0-60 5.5 0-100 13.1 1/4 13.9 at 103mph The only time the Audi is going to be faster than the MS3 is from a standstill--that's the benefit of AWD. The Audi practically ties the 370Z from a stop to 100 mph as well but the Z is obviously the faster car. Last edited by Sand123; 11-20-2009 at 06:53 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
370Z Sport Package | bossman | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 16 | 11-11-2010 01:05 PM |
Honda S2000 vs BMW 135i vs Nissan 370Z vs Porsche Cayman S vs Porsche 911 | JvKintheUSA | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 2 | 08-04-2009 02:48 PM |
Rejected: 30.5k for 370z with sport package | nexus4400 | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 13 | 05-12-2009 07:00 PM |
Sport Package Brake Test vs Non-Sport Package | hey32g | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 9 | 04-12-2009 12:23 AM |
Best Motoring Brake Test: 370Z vs 135i vs S2000 vs Cayman S | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 10 | 03-20-2009 04:51 PM |