![]() |
Quote:
Gt-R was too expensive. The mustang and ford reliability (for me) kicked it off my list although I really wanted a 302Boss...and there are sooooo many Mustangs around. Corvette too expensive and "old" for me and the Camaro was just plain to large. If I wanted a family sedan I would have bought a Maxima or an Accord. THere really wasn't anything else I was interested in becuase I wanted a true sports car. One that looked like a sports car, not one that could just go fast. I wanted the exclusivity (is that a word?)of a two seater that was sexy. I have a Z! and it turns heads even with Zero mods :tup: I would be interested in seeing the GM/Ford/ sports car sales numbers. Have they gone down too? |
Quote:
|
If Honda and Toyota wanted to make a sport car it would blow Nissan away in quality,pricing, resale value.
Nissan is a cheap company, nobody really wants their overpriced cars only their cheap economy cars. |
Quote:
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/wp-con...rt-585x377.jpg Don't have Camaro numbers, but they were doing much better than Ford last I checked. |
Quote:
370Z is just so sexy . Looks attracted me first. After looking at engine specs I thought 332hp would be enough for me. Coming from a Honda with probably 100hp it is a rather big leap. |
Quote:
I will tell you , I live in a very depresssed area of Ohio and there are sooooo many mustangs, all years, all versions....but mostly run down and not well taken care of and badly modded....embarasses me to think I almost bought one. |
What the average consumer looks at:
200hp for $24k - FR-S/BRZ 300hp for $24k - V6 Mustang/Camaro 300hp for $32k - 370z 400hp for $32k - Mustang GT/Camaro What's the best value for hp? Mustang/Camaro I, like a lot of people here, picked the 370z for the more "sporty" feel, design, and because it was less common. However, the first thing people mention and compare is hp (rightly or wrongly) and that's just the way it is. There certainly is something crazy cool about having 400hp from a $32k car. I almost got one, but it didn't have the same steering "feel" as the Mustang (regardless of how well it actually handles, it doesn't FEEL like its handling well). Most roads are straight(ish), so people in the USA value power more. |
Someone has pointed out, the price increase is really the problem. For me, I need both Touring and Sport packs. For 2013, the price is around $40K+. That's too much.
I picked up my 09 (fully loaded with NAV) for 26K about 15 months ago. I wouldn't pay 40K+ for a 2013. |
Quote:
|
wow i had no idea the price went up that much. MSRP on a nismo is now 43 almost 44k?!
i know no one pays MSRP, but wow. i think my 2010's MSRP was only 40k. would definitely not pay almost 4k more today, especially since i only paid 35k for mine, new. jesus |
ok, read the first line "My first car was a 2004 350Z" :facepalm: just told me this kid will not understand the 370Z and why it is the way it is.
|
I think you need to look at a lot of things to really know why the sales are so low compared to the 350Z. There was a huge shift in priorities and a lot of performance cars entering the market when the 370Z came out. A big chunk of the target demo was also already filled. Think about it, if you're a fan of the Z and already have a 350 in the garage, it wouldn't be an easy decision to fork over money for a new one during a recession. I'd say the large amount of 350Z sales definitely hindered the overall sales for the 370. They sold something like 150k 350z's overall. It's a nich car and in many way impractical as a two seater. The performance side is subjective, the 370Z was faster than the 09 stang. Nissan just fell asleep since then.
Also a bit unfair to compare a car sales volume in a different segment. It wouldn't make sense to compare the FR-S/BR-Z sales to Boxter,Cayman or Z4 sales for example. |
I have always owned Z's...The 370Z I bought for Looks and the feel of the road when I drive it.
I never see another 370Z on the road, and that is fine by me...Both my Z's are rare to see on the road and I like it that way. |
Quote:
"The 370Z is one of the most distinctive cars on the road. At least it is within a price range most would consider affordable. It's styling addressed many of the shortcomings with the 350Z, namely that the design felt incomplete and was starting to look dated by the end of it's run. The problem with the Z is that it's market has dried up. I think it's a similar problem to what we've seen with less expensive Japanese coupes. The people to whom the car appeals can't afford it and everyone else wants something more upmarket. This is evidenced by the fact that it's expensive twin, the G35/G37 coupe continues to sell fairly well. People want their sportiness immersed in luxury. A second problem is that it's performance is middling. It's never been a standout in comparisons. There has always been a car better at every individual task than the Z. The fact that people modify them is irrelevant if other cars offer a better starting point. The Z doesn't enjoy the same kind of loyalty as a Mustang or a Camaro. If they're going to offer a BR-Z/FR-S competitor it would make more sense to revive 240SX. Going upmarket doesn't make sense either, as they've already got the aforementioned G37 and the GT-R. I don't know if the market is there for anything in between either of those cars. A baby GT-R might make more sense. The point is that as nice as it would be to see a proper successor to the Z I just don't think the market exists anymore. Look at the attention the Juke-R has generated. I don't think the kind of person interested in a performance-oriented compact SUV is ever going to be interested in a low slung sports car. The few who are shop elsewhere." written by, Mai Wei Tao |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2