I'm not a fan of the NISMO, but I don't fault Nissan for making it. We need to remember that this is Nissan, not Mercedes, BMW, or Audi. This is
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-19-2009, 06:29 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 455
Drives: 09 yellow 370z
Rep Power: 265 |
I'm not a fan of the NISMO, but I don't fault Nissan for making it. We need to remember that this is Nissan, not Mercedes, BMW, or Audi. This is a company that sells cars starting at just over 10K. I'm just happy that Nissan is still pretty commited to performance cars in an age when so many "everyman" car companies are scrapping them.
__________________
A severed foot is the ultimate stocking stuffer. Mitch Hedberg |
07-19-2009, 06:39 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 16 |
AGREED. Somethings I would have loved to see in this Nismo Z.
1. FACTORY INSTALLED OIL COOLERS for a track focused car is a serious nobrainer. [bruno] Nissan.....Wass Up?[/bruno] 2. Direct Injection and at least 50 more hp[aftermarket is getting close to that with just i/e/h & tune. A cam to exploit an 8000-8200 redline would be nice but not necessary. 3. Its own gearset to maximize all 6 gears [who cares about 1-2mpg loss on a track focused car] 4. Lightweight Racing seats to offset some of the weight added by the seam welds. 5. A more aesthetically pleasing lightweight bodykit that added "significant" downforce. 40-45k for this I believe people would easily pay. I mean they are paying that for the 370z Nismo as it stands and getting way less than the above. \/\/ Thanks Whoady
__________________
Last edited by SnakeBitten; 07-19-2009 at 06:53 PM. |
07-19-2009, 06:56 PM | #19 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
Agree, the best way Nissan could go with the Nismo line is making what everyone thinks it is, a track base car. Cut the weight (seats, rear, etc.), a nice solid boost in HP, but the most important is the handling, it needs to be a very large step above the standard coupe, oh and an oil cooler.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
07-19-2009, 06:58 PM | #20 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 2,875
Drives: E63 AMG
Rep Power: 228 |
Also agree, maybe it's because I'm in my 30s now, but the NISMO looks way to boy racer for me to appreciate. If it were just a little more expensive I would understand, but there's no way it's worth the premium that Nissan wants for it.
|
07-19-2009, 06:58 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: so cal
Posts: 449
Drives: _
Rep Power: 16 |
I think some of your guys expectations for the Nismo models are a bit too high. I honestly think it's quite a nice package from the factory.
Looks are subjective, but along with the bodykit, you get wheels, intake, exhaust and a tune. There are other parts included, but if one were to try and build a base model Z in the same manner as the nismo, costs would far exceed the Nismo's MSRP. All in all it represents a good value IMO. Could you build a faster Z or a better handling Z, sure, but everything done right from the factory with a warranty to boot is very nice to have. Even if you like to mod, I think the nismo would make a nice starting platform. The Nismo may be marketed as a more "track-ready" Z, and with the improved suspension I think it is, but more "track-ready" or not, Nissan still makes a compromises for a daily driven car and the overall market. There are many comparisons to M-models and AMG, but there is roughly a 15-20K price difference between say a moderately equipped M3 and a fully loaded 335i coupe. Could Nissan build a Z with more exclusivity and power, I'm sure they can, but really who is going to spend 50K plus on a Z. Bang for the buck is one of the main draw-points for the Z, so if you take that away, there are other options I'd consider. Some people have made comparisons to a GT3 and even a GT3RS, but again look at the price differential and eek, lack of power gain with the 3 and 3RS. |
07-19-2009, 07:05 PM | #22 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
I bet I could beat the Nismo Z and save money with my base Z with sport package.
Changes: ~Upgraded suspension - Aftermarket 1,000USD (BC Racing BR Type Coilovers) ~Tires - 1200USD (Your choice, this price will get you plenty) ~HP gain - HFC 450USD (Berk) I am only at 2650USD and I already out handle and have the same gains as the Nismo Z. Other price parts, body kit can probably be picked up from Nissan for maybe 3,000USD, and I can throw in an exhaust for 1200 and be far above the HP of the Nismo. All this for 6850USD, which would put my price of 30,500 plus 6850 right around the price of the Nismo Z.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
07-19-2009, 07:07 PM | #23 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 304
Drives: 07 V8 4Runner 4x4
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
C6- 4XX HP Z06-505 HP ZR1-638 HP |
|
07-19-2009, 07:12 PM | #24 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
If Nissan could extrapolate this achievement into a higher HP variant based on a detuned GT-R motor, upgrade the suspension package, wrap some leather into the cockpit components, substitute some brushed aluminum for plastic on the interior...you'd shift the bar up yet again. This $60k, twin-turbo, 420hp "real Nismo" 370Z would then be compared to $90k 911s instead of $60k Caymans. |
|
07-19-2009, 07:16 PM | #25 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 304
Drives: 07 V8 4Runner 4x4
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
|
|
07-19-2009, 07:30 PM | #26 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: so cal
Posts: 449
Drives: _
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
To turn around the argument, you could spend 15K on a base Z and get a built TT with 400-500whp. But yes a Nissan car aimed at the 911 would be interesting. The GT-R targets the 911 turbo and the 370Z targets the cayman....so another model could slide right in. Not sure it would sell though. A TT sounds nice, but for a something aimed at the regular 911, I'd like a V8 370Z or perhaps and non-turbo GT-R |
|
07-19-2009, 07:33 PM | #27 (permalink) | |
NOT A CURRENT VENDOR
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 609
Drives: you
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
|
07-19-2009, 07:35 PM | #28 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
|
|
07-19-2009, 07:36 PM | #29 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
The issue with just saying, drop 10k into a TT kit is, there is more than just that 10k for the parts plus install. There is maintenance you have to deal with, chance of a major problem happening which will be out your own pocket. If Nissan did a 370TT with a factory warranty then that would be great.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
07-19-2009, 07:38 PM | #30 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
As for the i/e/ and tune Ill concede that Nissan is going to promote its in house Nismo products understandably so i dont expect them to use the best aftermarket [in terms of cold hard numbers] i/e and tune we know are available. But they could have at least matched the performance numbers some members are "easily" getting. The i/e/h tune numbers from guys like Semtex, RCZ put the Nismo Z's tweaks to shame and I know they didnt spend anywhere close to 10-15k premium for that. Check the latest tests fo the Nismo Z vs the regular Z and it aint faster. Why bother paying for a dud. Harsh but until a test validates the 10-15k premium over the other Z models thats what the Nismo Z essentially is. One can spend that 10-15k premium money and make a much better track Z and still keep their warranty imho. Im not looking for unreasonable products. Im sure Nissan has comparable performing products they could have used 1. KW Variant 2-3 suspension for example 2. Dual exhaust/header/intake and tune of your choice 3. Oil cooler of your choice Add em up and not close to 10k and you will run rings around the Nismo Z thats tested not faster than the normal Z. I still have money left for front brake upgrade or light weight seats. Imagine if I dealt with volume sales for those components like Nissan, Id save even more per item over a model line imho. Just thinking out loud.
__________________
Last edited by SnakeBitten; 07-19-2009 at 07:46 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airport Nissan Photoshoot (Z33 NISMO, Z34 NISMO, R35 GTR) | HKYStormFront | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 58 | 01-30-2010 12:10 PM |
Nismo and Nismo S-tune confusion | phantom21 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 16 | 09-20-2009 10:38 AM |
NISMO 370Z at Gunn Nissan vs 350Z NISMO pics side-by-side | NIZMOZ | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 34 | 07-07-2009 10:10 AM |